Murakami: Bestselling writer of the Japanese absurd
Arts & Culture ( 9 )
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
Arts & Culture ( 9 )
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
( 1 )
( 0 )
( 0 )
( 0 )
( 0 )
Order by Time Order by Popularity
9 Comments
Login to comment
0
ben4short
Interesting fellow, above-average essayist, mediocre novelist. Every time I hear the name of this highly overrated writer mentioned as a possible Nobel winner, I feel somewhat sick to my stomach. Toni Morrison . . . Gabriel Garcia Marquez . . . Isaac Singer . . . Saul Bellow . . . Beckett . . . Kawabata . . . Hemingway . . . Steinbeck and Haruki Murakami???
0
Foxie
Every age has its writer, Murakami is the one of the 21st century with its problems of society. Louis de Berniere's Birds without Wings deserves that prize too though. Looking forward to reading this book once the price has gone down.
0
wolfbiscuits
Agreed, ben4short. I've been a reader of his since his debut in English, and I enjoy his writing for the most part, but it's certainly not Nobel level. I think of his books as commuting fare, since it doesn't matter where you leave it off or how many of the fascinating threads you remember: they weren't going far anyhow. I don't say this is a bad thing, or that he's a bad writer, but I certainly don't think he's a great writer.
His Jerusalem Prize acceptance speech lambasting Israel only proves to me that he has little understanding of larger plots.
0
hachikoreloaded
Ben, please take the time to read the reasons why the Swedish academy awarded the writers you mentioned with a Nobel in Literature and you will understand why Murakami will be accepting a Nobel in Literature.
-1
ben4short
hachi, thanks for the suggestion, but I really don't need to read anything put out by the academy. I know great writers when I read them -- the vastness and humanity of their souls, the scope of their imaginative and narrative powers -- and it should be clear to any intelligent reader that Murakami is simply not in the same league. Vonnegut, Brautigan and other gimmicky writers yes . . . heavyweights like Bellow, Marquez, Faulkner no.
0
hachikoreloaded
I knew I should have written "you might understand"
-2
ben4short
hachi, wouldn't it be easier if you explained to me (and others) what makes HM such a great writer in your opinion?
-1
pawatan
Wow, you lost me with the "Vonnegut" comment.
0
Darren Brannan
The only book he wrote that was enthralling was wind up bird chronicle. The rest were rehashes of jazz, journalist, coffee, single malts and cats. Samey and trite. Likes to namedrop his favourite musicians, writers and records in practically every novel, with hipster characters who seem quite unlike any Japanese person I have met. Very formulaic. I hope his latest offering can eclipse the pap that was Kafka on the shore.
Back to top