ANA cancels 335 flights due to Dreamliner fleet grounding
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
Stay in touch with the latest and widest range of Japan News with JapanToday's News Alert newsletter.
Up to the moment news in your inbox everyday. Subscribe now!
Already a JapanToday registered user?
Login to update your settings to subscribe to News Alert.
*Required
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
( 6 )
( 0 )
( 2 )
( 0 )
( 8 )
gaijintravellerMay. 20, 2013 - 08:18AM JST It is interesting that some people refer to China as…
I never understood why people think bicyclists should use the road instead of the sidewalk. A…
** I would ask you and all the other-Japan bashers ** Why so strange comment? This…
Posted in: S Korean media slam Abe's 731 jet photo
In my town there is a very narrow bicycle lane - just a painting line. Many…
Liang Yunxiang, a Japan expert at Peking University, said China’s questions about Okinawa are in part…
Sports
Dining
Travel / Hotels
Travel / Hotels
Dining
Order by Time Order by Popularity
8 Comments
Login to comment
1
Elbuda Mexicano
Flights affected include those from Tokyo to San Jose, Seattle and Beijing. This is the flight I need!
0
LostinNagoya
Man, I am no plane freak, I usually relax during flight even during turbulences. But I don't wan to be inside this plane so soon. They said it was the battery, now it's not. What's then?
-2
Waxman
Good news is airlines have grounded those planes and we can relax for a while until they fly again and we hear any bad news. Please scrap these planes!!! Who cares if we fly on same route with 777 rather than 787
0
Crazedinjapan
It's good they grounded these planes. They were lucky nothing major happened involving the death of passengers and crew. It's a sore spot for them to not know why battery packs and electrical fires are happening. Hopefully they get down to the cause(s) of it soon to restore faith in this aircraft with consumers and passengers. Only combustion that anyone wants to hear about concerning this aircraft or any other for that matter is within the engine when it's operating.
0
The passage
Its a hastily written article, and could be confusing (not your fault):
Here it doesn't say it wasn't caused by a battery but wasn't caused by an OVERCHARGED battery. Even then, there is still doubt around this as the charger didn't go over 32 volts, but no-one has identified (yet = 18:50 on 01/21) what the current was during charging - that could blow a battery if not regulated correctly.
0
motytrah
Latest is the FAA is now inspecting the Japanese Battery Maker, the American Charger Maker, and the French Power System Controller maker.
0
WilliB
Hate to say it I told ya so, The troubles with this plane were entirely predictable and have been predicted by many sceptics.
0
globalwatcher
One big major accident will bankrupt organizations. Safety comes first.
All senior decision making managers should NOT be forced or pressured, under the name of profit, to let it take off without 100% safety assurance. Use common sense approch-safety.
Back to top