Disasters drive Lloyd's of London to 1st half loss
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
( 0 )
( 0 )
( 0 )
( 0 )
( 0 )
Order by Time Order by Popularity
6 Comments
Login to comment
0
some14some
Risk Management that includes natural causes and disasters as well. Moreover, loss is a part of business...why is this news? may be Lloyd's should have insured themselves with some other company ?!
1
Christina O'Neill
No doubt they will put up their premiums to compensate for their losses
0
Eleanor Goldsmith
Yup, our house insurance here in NZ went up this year and I suspect travel insurance premiums will be on their way up as well - it's been a shocking year for disasters (not to mention some expensive accidents and illnesses for some travel customers).
0
mrsynik
No official connection, just something in common. Lloyds TSB and Lloyds of London have both lost money.
0
globalwatcher
Do not forget to add AIG loss of 9/11, the Andrew, the Katrina and US financial blow of 2008 that are not included to this financial report. I hope they are financially sustainable in this global economic downturn.
0
SwissToni
mrsynik, neither lloyds TSB nor the banking group made a loss in 2010. On the contrary, on the back of the taxpayer and their failure to lend, they made a fat £2.2bn profit. Lloyds of London are a group underwriters, essentially they a take a bet (a fee) and if there's a disaster, the cash payout comes from their, and their members big fat wallets. If theres no problem, Lloyds and their Names pocket the money. I imagine they'll lose a few Names this year.
Back to top