No lawyer would make such a bold move unless he has insider level hard evidence, which apparently, he does. The story is more indepth in other sides, but it seems Toyota has faced a lot of consumer legal actions for bad vehicles and all that may aid in this action. In the 90s wasn't there a similar case in Asia where finally T had to pay claimants to quiet them... (or was it Nissan)..
This guys is clearly at risk of violating the attorney-client privilege by prosecuting these claims against his former employer/client, and also is at risk of himself being accused and/or disciplined by the bar if he in fact knew of these things (i.e., destroying evidence) and remained quiet while defending Toyota. So I agree ojbbstance, he must have insider level hard and very damaging evidence against Toyota.
So how much is he asking Toyota?
Maybe they will come to some settlement in the end, but his career as a corporate lawyer is over.
He may have some business with the opposite party (victims), but he'd have to win to do that.
Gooood luck.
A lone crusader and probably also a nut. I found some info about him here:
http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/31/toyota-accused-of-concealing-evidence-in-rollover-lawsuits/
Mr. Biller was suing for wrongful termination, emotional distress that he said led to psychiatric problems and civil violations of the federal Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organization Act.
I think we indeed have a nut who wants a big settlement. Hope the bar is watching...
› Login to comment
9 Comments
timorborder at 03:05 PM JST - 2nd September
Suit and counter-suit. This could get interesting before it is over. Either this guy is nuts or something smells at the bottom of the garden.
Yelnats at 03:40 PM JST - 2nd September
This will be an interesting case. Show the hard evidence.
ojbbstance at 03:51 PM JST - 2nd September
No lawyer would make such a bold move unless he has insider level hard evidence, which apparently, he does. The story is more indepth in other sides, but it seems Toyota has faced a lot of consumer legal actions for bad vehicles and all that may aid in this action. In the 90s wasn't there a similar case in Asia where finally T had to pay claimants to quiet them... (or was it Nissan)..
combinibento at 03:55 PM JST - 2nd September
This guys is clearly at risk of violating the attorney-client privilege by prosecuting these claims against his former employer/client, and also is at risk of himself being accused and/or disciplined by the bar if he in fact knew of these things (i.e., destroying evidence) and remained quiet while defending Toyota. So I agree ojbbstance, he must have insider level hard and very damaging evidence against Toyota.
Sidwarwick at 04:24 PM JST - 2nd September
Never trust a lawyer. Particularly when they are working for you.
TSRnow at 04:44 PM JST - 2nd September
So how much is he asking Toyota? Maybe they will come to some settlement in the end, but his career as a corporate lawyer is over. He may have some business with the opposite party (victims), but he'd have to win to do that. Gooood luck.
presto345 at 05:38 PM JST - 2nd September
A lone crusader and probably also a nut. I found some info about him here: http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/31/toyota-accused-of-concealing-evidence-in-rollover-lawsuits/
TumbleDry at 10:21 PM JST - 2nd September
I'm surprised to say the least...
Companies hate to pay for their mistake like you hate to pay for yours.
Will the lawyer be considered as a whistleblower?
combinibento at 11:05 PM JST - 2nd September
Thank you for the link, Presto:
I think we indeed have a nut who wants a big settlement. Hope the bar is watching...