Friday May 25, 2012

Greed is good

I always advise people never to invest in stocks that are political footballs. Politicians are in an order of magnitude more powerful than any business leader because they can change the rules of the game as they see fit. What’s worse is they are rarely checked beyond what they think they can do to stay in, or get into, power.

Politicians can crush things by accident. Destroying whole industries is nothing to the political machine. From the beginning of time this political machine has flattened companies, industries and even countries on what - when you look back at it now - was practically a whim.

This is where the whole of economics is right now; a plaything of politics. The further away your investments are from the chaos of the clashing titans of politics, the better.

It’s said that when economics fails it is the job of politics to step in. After five years of governments’ trying to rectify the credit crunch we are left wondering how things would have fared if no one had stepped in and all the banks of the West had been left to go to blazes with the market being allowed to pick up the pieces.

It’s tempting to think that by now we would be back in a boom like Asia and Russia were in the 1990s. Perhaps there is an end in sight to this “great recession?”

Austerity is, of course, meant to roll the state back to a sustainable level and perhaps it will if it is ever really applied - rather than used as a threat for public sector wage restraint.

The move against Greece underlines that in Europe this is at least desired for the margins. However, does anyone is Europe actually want a smaller public sector? The answer by and large is probably “no”, but it is simply the case that it can no longer be afforded.

With the private sector workforce amounting to around 40% of the population in some European countries, it is hard to let the wealth creators off the hook for the rest of the population. They aren’t exactly going to be incentivised as the toll on them rises yet higher.

To make things harder still, with so much GDP accounted for by low-value government spending, it is hard to cut back the state “fat” without creating poor, election-losing economic growth rates and employment figures.

It all looks horribly gloomy, but the tide may at last be turning.

The U.S. is definitely recovering and there is another year, perhaps two, of good solid growth in the pipeline. The U.S. still drives the world economy - a US recovery means better economic times for everyone.

The crisis that lies behind us is a result of a huge malfunction of money supply, set off by a credit freeze, in a system that had outgrown government controls and produced a private sector money supply explosion that then turned broke and into a money supply death spiral.

The central banks have got a handle on this at last and have, in effect, re-nationalised money supply from the private sector money providers - the banks.

The method to print enough money to rebuild economic momentum is understood. There are risks of inflation, but that route solves a lot of other problems like rebasing and rebalancing many economic imbalances. The alternate deflationary route would break the back of the existing systems to a level of dislocation that is difficult to imagine.

We can hope the first world is set on a path of recovery alongside the US. The leading indicator for this will be a lowering of volatility in financial markets.

As fear recedes, so greed grows. As greed grows, appetite for risk rises and with that the attractiveness of objects rather than cash or ‘near cash’ increases. Markets rally, credit flows, investment happens, employment rises, growth occurs; greed is good, risk is great.

That’s exactly the opposite of what the politicians have been singing.

Risk must be punished, greed is bad. Greed is bad even if more than half a huge bank bonus goes straight to the poor via tax.  Politicians think banks should lend more money to consumers and companies whilst magically taking less risk- this is impossible.

This is where we are left.  Hoping that the” political machine” is as inept at arresting growth as it is at stopping bubbles. We are left with the hope that the politicians do not snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

The author is CEO of stocks and shares information site ADVFN.com and author of “101 Ways to Pick Stock Market Winners.”

  • 3

    tkoind2

    Greed is what got us where we are. It is the root cause behind exotic products that nearly broke the global economic system. It is falacy to believe that "Greed is Good" when the evidence so clearly demonstrates the opposite to be true.

    World wide greed has resulted in growing poverty amongst working people. Greed drives companies to lay off workers while still paying out huge bonus payments to management. It enables otherwise sensible people to accept the concentration of global wealth in the hands of a very few people. Children go without healthcare even in the US while the greedy get richer and richer.

    Greed is the root of most of the social and economic evils facing the world today. The problem is greed. As a well known economist recently said, "We don't need an more rich people, what we need are legions of employed working people to restore the global economy."

    Meanwhile to protect share prices companies continue to build the legions of unemployed instead. Then sit back wondering why they cannot sell their products at anticipated rates. Fools one and all to miss that the concentration of wealth in the hands of a few undermines their own capacity to earn.

    It is time for change and it begins with the erradication of the propaganda that "Greed is Good" or that the concentration of wealth is acceptable. For an economy to function there must be jobs and money must move.

  • -1

    SquidBert

    Hear, hear (Or +1 for the young ones)

  • 0

    GW

    tkoind2, nailed it man!

    The world needs guys like this like we all need to shot point blank in the forehead!

    The distribution of wealth is so outta wack world wide & this idiot wants to keep things they way they are, OMG! Its fools like clem here that cant see past the ends of their noses as they rifle through their wallets filled with ill gotten $$$, there modis operandi is systematically destroying their own markets as they pilfer gross ill gotten gains

    Pls do the world a favour & go AWAY!

  • -3

    gaijinfo

    If it weren't for greedy entrepreneurs trying to make as much money as possible by selling something, society would still be back in the stone age. Business builds society, government tears it down. Central banks, regulations, price controls, crony capitalism, taxes, all are enemies of society.

  • 0

    tkoind2

    gaijininfo. There is nothing wrong with someone making something and selling it. Oddly enough if you are a student of history, very little of the great inventions or scientific advancements were driven by greed. They were driven by people committed to creation and intellect.

    It is sheer propaganda that greed is required to motivate people to greatness. The historic examples of greatness driven out of devotion to society, to science, to philosophy to ideology are countless.

    The desire for success and growth is not synonoymous with "greed" which has long been seen as a vice. I strongly disagree that human development was driven by greed, there are too many other factors that stand in far better evidence.

    Your Libertarian ideology that supports free reign of business and condemns the rule of government reeks of the same ideologies defeated in the Souther Confederacy and is destined for the same failure. Modern society cannot survive as it stands, the faltering global economy speaks loudly to that point. The world itself can no longer sustain capitalism as it exists. Limited resources and environmental issues alone dictate that continuous growth is impossible. The state can and will regulate greed and working people will benefit from it.

  • -3

    gaijinfo

    The state can and will regulate greed and working people will benefit from it.

    They tried that back in the soviet union, and it didn't work out so well.

  • 0

    SquidBert

    gajininfo,

    Just because you say no to unbridled capitalism, it doesn't mean that you are a communist, you know. And tkoind, already stated that there is nothing wrong with someone making a buck of their products and services.

  • 0

    tkoind2

    Give me a break. Why is it that the right can only leap to extremes? Can't you even find examples from our own history where greed was not prioritized? You have to raise the "Soviet Spector." Give it a rest.

    Dwight D. Eisenhower (not a Soviet as far as we all know) was a strong opponent of excessive power in corporations and warned the nation of the danger of these groups having too much influence upon government. He was also a strong proponent of a middle class.

    Franklin D. Roosevelt spoke endlessly through the depression years about equality of opportunity and against the concentration of wealth. He recongnized the danger it posed and warranted that the government should assure that it did not gain too much power or influence.

    Two heroic Americans who understood that the distribution of wealth in society assured its prosperity. And understood that government needed to regulate greed.

    So give the communist scare nonsense a rest. No one is planning to replace your world with a red one. But we are strongly against the self destructive idocy of Libertarian thinking.

  • 0

    SquidBert

    I already used this quote once in another thread, but it fits much better here.

    'In the 80s Capitalism defeated Communism, In the 90s it defeated Democracy.' (And once again, my apologies if I mangled it).

    And therein lies the problem, when the capital gathers enough power to interfere with the democratic process, the deme/demos in democracy has to protect it self.

    The government and capital has to realize that it is nothing without the support of the masses. They are both in the same both together, but they are not rowing it, the boat is rowed by the masses and if they lay down the oars, it is going nowhere. Just moving on to the next low wage country is not going to work for ever.

  • 0

    tkoind2

    SquidBert. Exactly!

  • 0

    SquidBert

    Err, same both -> same boat.

  • 0

    Johannes Weber

    There is one good trait which should be put instead of greed. It's laziness and the desire for comfort. Making things more comfortable for ourselves doesn't put others at a disadvantage and was the reason for most inventiones which improved our daily lives. The invention of the car was not due to the desire of making profit, but due to the desire of not having to walk. Those people who still believe that more money makes them more happy didn't understand anything right from the start.

    Entrepreneurship isn't based on greed. It is based on the desire to have a more comfortable, lazy life after succeeding. It is based on the desire to be admired for one's success. It doesn't consider money as a goal. Money is a means and nothing more. Sadly, most leaders are simply too stuck in their wrong worldviews to see things like they really are.

    Greed leads to crime, in one way or another. Only if you desire a perpetual state of war and strife is greed a good advice. The state must suppress greed since society would otherwise fall apart by violence. And yes - killing someone to obtain his money is perfectly logical in the greedy, purely capitalistic mindset. That's why never ever pure capitalism existed (for extended periods). It failed even quicker than "so-called socialism".

Login to leave a comment

OR

Follow us

More in Commentary

View all

View all