Monday 30th March, 06:35 AM JST
Feature Archive
December 08- Latest Bar & Dining Spots in Tokyo
September 08- Business Schools
Crime › 08:53 AM JST - 18th November
Crime › 04:41 PM JST - 17th November
Crime › 08:49 AM JST - 19th November
Crime › 10:37 AM JST - 16th November
Crime › 10:09 AM JST - 20th November
› Login to comment
9 Comments
JeffLee at 07:51 AM JST - 30th March
Blame the foreigners. The accident occurred after a Japanese company took over maintenance duties, and faulty maintenance caused the accident, allegedly.
Interesting how the media plays up the foreign company, though its responsibility is secondary at best, and gives secondary mention to the real (Japanese) culprit.
Schindler at first refused to cow-tow (literally) because it said it did nothing wrong. I hope company fights this in court. Someone needs to stand up to Japan's evil prosecutors, who have already torpedoed the opposition party's election chances and enjoy a 98% percent conviction rate.
some14some at 07:59 AM JST - 30th March
I guess you mean to say International Court of Justice, if local Japanese court verdict is out before prosecution begins.
Himajin at 08:17 AM JST - 30th March
The accident occurred only 2 months after the other company took over for Schindler...checks are usually 3-6 months apart, and such problems don't happen overnight.It would appear that Schindler has at least some responsibility.
GJDailleult at 09:34 AM JST - 30th March
Actually, it reads more like the accident took place two months after SEC took over from the company that took over from Schindler. The accident was more than a year after Schindler stopped being in charge of maintenance.
jipster at 12:10 PM JST - 30th March
Schindlers lift...
jonnyboy at 12:15 PM JST - 30th March
get your coat
Himajin at 12:45 PM JST - 30th March
GJ, you're right, my error.
combinibento at 03:42 PM JST - 30th March
Classic. What's more, there is really a "Schindler's List" being provided to prosecutors. In any event, foreign company or not, this company was obviously negligent to some extent but I doubt it rises to criminal culpability. Based on this article, there was only one other accident in 2004. There does not appear to be a systemic failure to abide by safety measures but who knows. There is always more than what's printed.
BigInJapan at 11:41 AM JST - 31st March
Well, I wouldn't worry much. I killing your son or to beating a sumo player to death doesn't really count as a serious criminal act, then 1 accident in a country where every second lift is coming from this maker shouldn't taken more seriously.