Saturday May 26, 2012

Task force eyes imprisonment for possession of child porn images

TOKYO —

The ruling coalition parties decided Friday to seek a general ban on the possession of child porn images and to impose prison terms on those who posses or store such images to satisfy their sexual desire, lawmakers said.

The Liberal Democratic Party and its coalition partner, the New Komeito party, are aiming to craft a bill to amend the law against child prostitution and child pornography by mid-May and to submit it to the ongoing Diet session jointly with opposition parties.
   
The move comes as Japan is being pressured to revise the law to bring it into line with other Group of Eight member nations. Japan and Russia are the only members of the G-8 that do not prohibit the possession of such images.

The other G-8 member states are Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Italy and the United States. The ruling bloc project team, meanwhile, plans to study the possibility of requiring Internet service providers to restrict access to child porn websites and the introduction of other measures to check the spread of child porn images online.

Meanwhile, a U.S. justice department official urged Japan on Friday to ban individual possession of child pornography as the country comes under pressure to step up its efforts to tackle the problem.

Andrew Oosterbaan, head of the department’s child exploitation and obscenity section, said the Internet was encouraging the creation and sharing of “horrific” images, including of tortured and sexually abused infants and toddlers.

“We must understand that a part of the reason this is difficult to beat is people everywhere have a lack of understanding why possession is as serious as any other crime of child pornography,” he told a press conference here.

U.S. police can access the computers of those who possess child porn to prevent further harm to children, said Oosterbaan, who has called on lawmakers to criminalize individual possession of such porn during his Japan visit.

“We are focusing on possessors because we know when we get that computer, there is a good chance the computer is going to show us that he was producing, that he was banking images, that he was abusing children, making images,” he said.

“Or, we are going to find out that the computer belongs to a teacher or a minister or a priest. While you are not going to prosecute the problem away, it’s important that you don’t ignore it either,” he said.

The United States and other developed countries, as well as the United Nations Children’s Fund, have accused Japan of laxity in allowing child pornography.

Japan, once under fierce criticism as a major producer of child pornography, passed a law in 1999 banning the production and sale of sexually arousing photos, videos and other materials involving children aged below 18.

 

Wire reports

  • 0

    rjd_jr

    Good for them for finally tackling this sick issue.

  • 0

    DXXJP

    decided Friday to seek a general ban on the possession of child porn

    But first they have to get rid of their own.

    passed a law in 1999 banning the production and sale of sexually arousing photos, videos and other materials involving children aged below 18

    So when they going to enforce it its 2008

  • 0

    outofmydepth

    better late than never, and while they are at it, they should also ban the horrible pornographic comics (manga) that depict young girls being raped and tortured. many of these are readily available at the local convenience store. let`s get real about just what is pornography child or otherwise.

  • 0

    Pukey2

    rjd_jr:

    Good for them for finally tackling this sick issue.

    I agree, but is it possible for you to post a single message without always having to start with 'Good for.....'? Are there browny points for every message posted?

  • 0

    proxy

    How about life with no parole for child molesters.

  • 0

    Sagecat

    No, it is too much of a gray area. An 18 year old having consensual sex with a 17 year old would put the 18 year old away for life? Also, I'm still up in the air about Enjo-kosai. Goods for services and everyone is willing. It's prostitution, okay, but does the john go to jail for life for that? I'm inclined to say "no."

  • 0

    DarkWolfMage320

    I'm glad they are finally gonna do something about this issue, i know not EVERYONE will listen but a small amount is better then so many people doing it.

  • 0

    medievaltimes

    Is this going to include comics??

  • 0

    proxy

    I think they should lock up the "music" promoters that dress 11 year olds like hookers. How are they going to define child porn? Is a nude picture of a 7 year old child porn? I think everyone would say yes but an image of your 4 year old having a bath would not be child porn. Would pictures of an 8 year old in a bathing suit be child porn? If the child was posed in a "sexual" pose then probably yes but if some guy snaps a bunch of pictures of 7 year old girls at the beach, would that be considered child porn? Would images of 11 year old singers dressed in "sexy" clothes be considered child porn? Sadly, probably not but there is every likely hood that some men find it stimulating. So are they going to prosecute somebody that has a catalog selling children's bathing suits and not somebody that scans in images of 11 year old singers dressed up like a hooker? Just wait, the porn producers will start making children's clothing catalogs to get around the law.

  • 0

    cwhite

    how about just no photos of anyone under 18 and definitely no singers, musicians, actors, artists, tv personality etc, etc until your over 18

  • 0

    curlygene

    proxy,

    I guess it comes down to common sense. For example, having a picture of your 4 year old in the bath would be fine. If a stranger had the same image on their hard drive, it wouldn't. If an uncle had it on his drive, and scores of others like it, you'd be calling the cops.

    Regarding clothing catalogues and the like? That's already happening here in Australia, and there are many people furious about this sexualisation of kids. So sooner or later, the law will have to be changed to stop it. The law is always going to be playing catch up, I suppose, as good people can't always predict the twistings of evil minds. However, It's shameful that Japan is taking so much longer to catch up than other nations.

  • 0

    Molenir

    My opinion is, that anime, manga etc should definitely be exempt. If sick bastards get off on this stuff, as long as no one is being hurt then who cares. On the other hand, pictures of real people being sexually abused, this should not be tolerated in the slightest.

Login to leave a comment

OR

Follow us

More in Crime

View all

View all