Top court dismisses appeals by activists in flier distribution case

Saturday 12th April, 05:36 AM JST

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

GrouchyGaijin at 08:00 AM JST - 12th April

Trespassing, I understand. Does that mean I can have the folks who inundate my mailbox with fliers about everything from headstones to garden sheds arrested? Sure hope so!
Scrote at 12:12 PM JST - 12th April

Once again the Supreme Court shows its bias and unwillingness to uphold the constitution.

Exactly which "rights" were infringed by posting some leaflets in a mailbox? Where in the constitution does it state that these "rights" have priority?
plasticmonkey at 06:19 PM JST - 12th April

OK-- --obstructing pedestrian traffic to hand out advertising tissues --dumping leaflets for prostitution services in mailboxes --using megaphones to "lure" customers into shops --forcing people to listen to trucks blaring out right-wing nonsense or a new single by Ayumi Hamasaki --KDDI calling people at home to pitch some new service

Not OK-- --targeting the SDF with anti-SDF leaflets

You can see how they picked on this one, but personally I'd like my privacy respected in ALL ways.
Beelzebub at 09:22 PM JST - 12th April

Supreme Court: "Pow! Take that, you pacifist rats!"