Cancer group asks U.S. to study sugary drinks, obesity
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
( 2 )
( 2 )
( 1 )
( 0 )
( 1 )
Order by Time Order by Popularity
6 Comments
Login to comment
-1
Lawrence Gordon
If anyone is manufacturing anything, it is the busy bodies that manufacture one "crisis" after another in order to justify their insatiable desire to control the rest of us. They call salt and sugar "chemicals" in order to alarm the public, because no one likes "chemicals" being added to their food and drink. Create enough fear and you can get government to control our diets. The United States, at one time a free country, has been taken over by fanatics and control freaks who believe they are so morally and intellectually superior to everyone else that they must decide what the rest of us may eat and drink because we are so stupid we can't be allowed to make these decisions for ourselves. They just can't stomach the idea of a free people going about their business without their "help."
0
Yogi Zuna
There is nothing "free" about allowing people to buy products with dangerous things in them like artificial caramel coloring, except the "free cancer" you may get eventually...
1
Jack Stern
When Pepsi, Coke and other soft drink makers started selling their drinks, they of course did not want to peddle cancer causing products. Science and chemistry advances over the years has found all sorts of bad things in food and other things we put into our system. It's the good companies who will quickly admit their errors and change their product to be more healthful. After a heavy workout as a kid, I'd run down to the local candy store for a cold Pepsi. If they do change the formula, I sure hope it tastes as good.
-1
Cos
=fill glass bottles with water. That never was healthful at all. in 1912 or no.
-1
edbardoe
Government studies to put money in the pockets of government employess means more "contributions" for the Democratic candidates who support more jobs paid for by sucker taxpayers. That is what a "government study" is all about, and the results will be the answer predetermined to provide more government jobs producing more "contributions" for Democratic candidates and requests for more "government studies" to provide more governmnet jobs producing more ......
0
VicMOsaka
They keep talking about the sugar content in drinks, but in actual fact it is the Fructose corn syrup that is the problem. Before the introduction of corn syrup, ordinary sugar only was used and there was not a problem of obesity in those days. Fructose corn syrup can not be utilised in the human body the same as a natural cane sugar.
Back to top