Sunday May 27, 2012

Cyberattacks just part of Sony's woes

TOKYO —

Sony stands out as one of the icons of Japan’s postwar economic success. From transistor radios and tape recorders in the 1950s, it gained an international reputation first for quality, then for innovation and ultimately for products that generated new consumer lifestyles, through leading-edge products as its Trinitron TVs, the Betamax VCR, camcorders, the cassette and later CD Walkman personal audio players and the Mavica digital camera.

But whatever the company’s technical and business strengths, it failed to anticipate that a determined group of hackers could wreak so much damage. In addition to lost sales, outlays to bolster security—plus the providing of free game downloads to customers as compensation and apology—the company estimates it will be set back 14 billion yen.

This figure, however, fails to include additional possible damages from credit card identity theft resulting from the leaking of the personal data of some 77 million users of its PlayStation Network and 24.6 million customers of its PC network. Compensation for these damages may reach several times the losses already made public.

In March, 10 of Sony’s manufacturing plants had suffered damage from the March 11 earthquake and tsunami, casting further gloom on the bottom line.

Writing in Shukan Economist (June 21), analyst Tomomi Nagai notes that for some time Sony has failed to introduce any revolutionary or trendsetting products, a decade-long decline that largely parallels the shift of consumer products from analog to digital.

In 2005, Sony gave up its dominance in portable audio products to Apple’s iPod. Unlike domestic rivals Panasonic and Sharp, which remain hardware oriented, nearly 40% of Sony’s revenues come from games, cinema, music and financial services. The company’s strategy, increasingly, has been to eschew electronics products. In 2010, its consumer, professional & device divisions just barely earned an operating profit, but only by the thinnest (0.1%) of margins.

In both in North America and Europe, Sony’s Bravia lineup of TVs, which account for about 40% of its hardware sales, has been losing market share to Korea’s Samsung and LG. And since the subprime financial crisis, demand for its VAIO PCs and Cybershot digital cameras has also slumped.

The question now is to what degree the hacking attacks will damage customer trust. While the troubles are unlikely to alienate customers from purchasing, say, a Sony TV or digital camera, it’s not only the game machine users who will be affected by future security breaches. A whole slew of emerging products, such as tablet computers and ebooks, which also rely on networks to distribute their contents, may be vulnerable to renewed cyber attacks.

Concerns have already been raised as to whether Sony might be forced to delay the launch of its next-generation hand-held game, the PlayStation Vita, which was scheduled to be in the stores by later this year.

How on earth have things come to this? An accompanying article in Economist by Osamu Katayama sees Sony’s decline beginning from the mid-1990s under management of former CEO Nobuyuki Idei, a political economics major who lacked an engineering background.

The adoption of EVA (Economic Value Added) management philosophy shifted priorities from profit/loss accounting to cash-flow management. This also led to micromanagement of the technical staff, stifling the “playful” spirit needed to give birth to innovation and causing the company’s vaunted “venture spirit” and “pioneering spirit” to wither—stifling the company’s once-vaunted ability to achieve a synergy between hardware and software.

  • 0

    Godan

    Just got my first flat-screen TV and wanted a Sony Bravia, but they produce a 40" (too big) and a 32" too small. No idea why they don't make a 37" which I eventually bought from Panasonic. Wonder what Morita Akio would say about the company if he were here today?

  • 0

    ihavegreatlegs

    This is why I purchased a DVN for 7000 yen this weekend.

  • 0

    NetNinja

    It's a SONY!! Not anymore....Truth be told, I was so with SONY back in the day. This article is right on just about every aspect of Sony's demise. SONY used to be tops when it came to engineering. That all changed when Apple came in.

    Moderator's, it is truly hard to stay on the topic of SONY without mentioning Apple.

    How on earth have things come to this?

    OKAY, I'll give it my best shot. I believe that NTT and Japan's society as a whole caused SONY's downfall. WOAH!!! Out of left field I know....gimme 2 more minutes of your time. I'll explain.

    Going back 10 years to when NTT was charging outrageous prices for the Internet slowed down Japan's transition to the digital age. *Do you remember the Telehodai and Nethodai plans?

    America on the other hand was pushing hard to speed up the information age / digital era. They wanted to be on the forefront of that and they are.

    Okay so lets connect the dots.......Apple had the advantage as they could observe the transition and develop products that are suited for today's generation. SONY did not. I know SONY has an American division but like most Japanese companies it's more of a store front than an actual command center. Everything is run from Shinagawa, Tokyo.

    When Japan finally adjusted to the digital age it was too late. The game was up. You have to design your products for the consumer and where that consumer is going in the future. If your society is behind the times then it's hard to develop products for the current technology.

    If SONY had put more pressure on the J-Government and NTT to get this society on the Internet they would've been able to observe the habits of it's customers and design products for them...not just design products. Sony, did you really think everyone was go to go out and buy one of those AIBO's?

    Okay so that's my brief answer to that question, staying on topic.

    The rest of SONY's problems are their own.

  • -1

    Godan

    As usual, well put, NetNinja.

  • 0

    Virtuoso

    Sony has a stubborn streak. Mostly out of pride, it clung to the Beta format long after VHS dominated the market and most of the other Beta producers had jumped ship. It was slow introducing flat-screen TVs too. The PlayStation makes money, perhaps, but has zero appeal to people over age 35. There isn't much that Sony makes that I want or need. Most disappointing, with all their marketing savvy and technical talent, they haven't really distinguished themselves as an outfit appreciated for eco-friendly products with lower energy consumption, which is going to be in increasing demand. The word "irrelevant" seems to fit like a glove.

  • 1

    Serrano

    I remember when Sony Trinitron TVs had the sharpest picture available.

  • 0

    gonemad

    I think some major reasons are missing in the article. One is Sony's diminishing product quality and especially the bad service. That started sometime around the mid 90s, so there may well be a relation to the leadership of Nobuyuki Idei. The second is that Sony has too long stuck to proprietary interfaces and formats when all the world was going to use open standards. Then there was the story about the rootkit on their CDs, which seriously tainted their image. I think that Sony still produces a lot of attractive hardware(!) in terms of specifications and design, but they lost a lot of trust among customers which are now shunning to return to that company.

    Japanese companies in general, not just Sony, are struggling with software, which is becoming increasingly important. Almost no products consists of hardware alone any more. It is a major threat for the Japanese industry as a whole.

    I think impact of the recent cyber attacks are a bit overestimated. A lot of other companies are being hacked and as a consumer you cannot be sure as to which company is next. It's by far not limited to Sony. Furthermore I do not think that the loss of credit card data will have a direct financial impact on Sony in terms of damage compensations. The CVC has not been stolen and the rest of the data has to be considered public anyway. Typically hundreds or thousands of companies have this data for a particular card.

Login to leave a comment

OR

Follow us

More in Kuchikomi

View all

View all