Monday 02nd March, 06:00 AM JST
Feature Archive
December 08- Latest Bar & Dining Spots in Tokyo
September 08- Business Schools
National › 08:00 AM JST - 17th November
National › 01:32 PM JST - 16th November
National › 07:05 AM JST - 19th November
National › 11:39 AM JST - 18th November
National › 09:53 AM JST - 19th November
› Login to comment
Latest 15 of 39 Total Comments Show All
OssanAmerica at 02:39 PM JST - 2nd March
Yes I already said that.
What "role" regarding Pearl Harbor are the old royal couple not officially recognizing? Have they made some declaration that Japan never attacked Pearl Harbor? And aren't they going to Pearl Harvort to "mourn" for those who died there? Or are they going to gloat and glee?
Were does it say that in the rticle? Nowhere.
They are going to Pearl Harbor. Most people would say that's not ignoring Pearl Harbor.
As I've already explained but it went way above your head, official acts call for official responses. Pelosi didn't "officially" visit the Hiroshima Memorial and there's no need for anyone to "officially" visit Pearl Harbor. Nobody's calling for it on a diplomatic level because it would start a never ending exchange of official visits. It simply isn't necessary. The most important point made in the artile is that "If realized, it would be a moment to symbolize the postwar reconciliation between the two countries:, a point which you seem to be incapable of comprehending.
gamera at 02:44 PM JST - 2nd March
Great. They can mingle with the 80 year old veterans who still have not gotten over the war yet.
kwatt at 04:59 PM JST - 2nd March
I wonder why former/today Japanese (prime) ministers have NOT visited Pearl Harbor to pray for deceased soldiers before Emperor and Empress maybe apologize at the memorial during visit to Hawaii. I assume that the real purpose of imperial couple is to visit Hawaii to condole at the memorial although it has been reported that imperial couple may make small visit on the way back to Japan. It seems that bureaucracy never accept that Empror and Empress (maybe want to) condole there.
Tatanka at 05:34 PM JST - 2nd March
No sitting U.S. president or vice president has ever visited Hiroshima. Speaker of the House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi is the highest ranking official to ever visit Hiroshima. Personally, I applaud the Emperor and Empress for wanting to visit Pearl Harbor and pay their respects.
nidu at 06:15 PM JST - 2nd March
Absolutely!
realist at 07:27 PM JST - 2nd March
I think it is a good thing that the Emperor and Empress are to visit Pearl Harbor. I think it will be good for international relations and also good for Japan. God Bless them both.
jessssicaaa at 08:10 PM JST - 2nd March
I enjoy the argument that is in this comment thing.. and agreeing with OssanAmerica all the way! lol.
THERE i picked a side mwahaha. yes im bored.
I believe its very nice of royals to go to pearl habour if they didnt care then they wouldnt bother right? so its a good move ;]] plus that move saved my country! LOL.
NeoJamal at 10:58 PM JST - 2nd March
Is 'learning from past mistakes' an euphenism for making perpetual political concessions to other countries in spite of Japan's defeat in WWII? I doubt your objectives for such learnings do not end with education, for I know people like you from Allied states turn a blind eye towards the disinterest and apologism undertaken by your fellow countrymen while readily condemning Japan and Germany for missing even the most minor transgressions.
NeoJamal at 11:21 PM JST - 2nd March
It would be deplorable to imagine that no US Head of State will ever visit Hiroshima or Nagasaki despite the circumstance that the Emperor would visit Pearl Harbor to pay his respects. If that should be the case however, it would merely reflect Japan's existing relations with the US as a vassal. The stationing of a US Sasebo naval base in Nagasaki is the very testament of Japan's continuing submission to the US by treading over obvious insensitivites connected with the placement of such installation by the unatoning perpetrator. Therefore, any delusions aiming for mutual reconciliation should stop right now.
Youjinbou at 01:40 AM JST - 3rd March
What do you mean by "learn from their mistakes"? Should they go into another war and show the rest of the world what they learned from WWII?
Well, if a country is losing a war, and it barely has enough food to feed it's own army, the camp conditions won't exactly be "fun". About the war-crimes... well... I don't think there's an excuse besides "the Imperial Japanese Army (not navy so much) was not the brightest bunch of people"
ca1ic0cat at 03:23 AM JST - 3rd March
I would hope they get some free time at a beach. I bet they could use some time away from all the controversy. Makes me think of that Moxie Fruvous song "King of Spain."
NeoJamal at 08:10 AM JST - 3rd March
Like..THE IRAQ WAR? Lol
Reicheru at 04:01 PM JST - 3rd March
Why should Emperor Akihito have to stand in the shadow of Emperor Hirohito? What is the purpose of revisiting the resentment and recriminations that died in 1945 (when Japan formally surrendered)? Subjecting the Emperor and Empress to this is ridiculous, not to mention undignified and unnecessary. I hope that this trip will be canceled just like the one they planned in 1994.
Thenewfront at 04:14 PM JST - 3rd March
Reicheru: They decided to go. Nobody is forcing them. What are your objections? Pearl harbour didn't really happen , was Needed because of US blockade etc?
Reicheru at 04:21 PM JST - 3rd March
Just because I object to it doesn't mean that I'm some kind of right-wing conspiracy theorist. Gosh...