« Back To National Top

Japan's fertility rate hits 1.37 in 2008, up for 3rd year in row

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

4 Comments

  • cow76 at 10:04 AM JST - 4th June

    Still a long way from the 2.1 children/woman ratio required to maintain a population. As I tell all my students who lie awake at night worrying about this: there are too many people in Japan. Reducing the population by half is really not a bad thing. Plus land prices will fall!

  • dennis0bauer at 03:25 PM JST - 4th June

    Are the child fatalities included in that number?

  • WilliB at 06:16 PM JST - 4th June

    cow:

    " Reducing the population by half is really not a bad thing. Plus land prices will fall! "

    Wrong. A reduced population would not be a bad thing; the long process of reducing is indeed very hard for a nation, as the inverted population pyramid means that there are ever fewer tax payers for ever more aid recipients.

  • ca1ic0cat at 10:19 PM JST - 4th June

    In the long run a smaller population in Japan is going to be hard on the nation. That would mean more immigrants to pick up the slack. I sense a distrubance in the wa.

Register or Login to leave a comment

Username:
Password:

› Forgot Password?