Take our user survey and make your voice heard.
national

Nuclear Regulation Authority to probe faultlines beneath Tsuruga plant

7 Comments

The Nuclear Regulation Authority is planning to probe faultlines beneath the Tsuruga nuclear power plant in Fukui Prefecture on Dec 1 and Dec 2.

The plant will be the second site to be checked following a probe into the faultline beneath the Oi plant last week.

The two reactors at the Tsuruga plant, which is owned by Japan Atomic Power Co, are currently offline. The team of experts will probe the faultlines that run beneath it to see if they are active and to gauge the seismic risk, Fuji TV reported.

At Tsuruga, the team will try to establish the likelihood of tectonic plates shifting in response to movement from an active fault called Urazoko. During a hearing session in July, seismologists strongly criticized past reports by electric power companies, and the central government, that had ruled out the existence of active faults around the reactors. The Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency recommended further study of the Shiraki-Nyu fault, which is also recognized as active and runs through Fukui Prefecture.

Kansai Electric Power Co. and the Japan Atomic Energy Agency have maintained that the faultlines show no signs of recent activity. They also deny the possibility that plates could move along those fault lines in response to movement along the active Urazoko fault.

The investigative team currently consists of five geological experts, including NRA Commissioner and seismologist Kunihiko Shimazaki. If the authority decides the reactors are situated above active faults, construction work and plans to restart the reactors may be scrapped.

The government has been reviewing risks posed by active faults after the crisis last year at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. Tsuruga reactor 1 was started in 1970, following which the Urazoko fault was confirmed to be active in 2008.

The NRA was established in September of this year, following which it conducted its first survey of potentially active faults near Kansai Electric Power Co's Oi plant, also in Fukui Prefecture, earlier this month. The authority has yet to announce its findings.

There has been a history of safety scares at the Tsuruga plant. In March 1981, drainage from the No. 1 reactor caused a release 16 tons of radioactive primary cooling water. The spill was initially covered up, and then later revealed in April of the same year. On 2 May 2011, officials announced higher than normal levels of radioactivity in the water cooling stores. Following that, a fire broke out in the No. 1 reactor on the evening of 12 November 2011.

On Nov 8, 2011, a group of 40 citizens of Otsu Prefecture filed a law suit against Japan Atomic Power Company and requested a provisional court order to postpone the proposed restart of the two reactors at the Tsuruga plant on the basis that Lake Biwa, which provides drinking water to Kansai, could be contaminated should a nuclear accident occur at the plant.

The plaintiffs argued that the Fukushima disaster proved that existing safety regulations at the 40-year-old site were insufficient and that reactors should remain shut down until the cause of the disaster in Fukushima had been fully investigated.

© Japan Today

©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.

7 Comments
Login to comment

When a fault proves 'faulty' in a way that faults do, what scenario might we see at a plant?

I remember seeing land having risen in a sort of cliff in a running line across Awaji Island after the Hanshin Earthquake.

Is this what the experts are considering? Would such an occurrence stretch, twist, rip, shear through anything built across it?

2 ( +2 / -0 )

Just causing the reactor to tilt enough to rip its pipes would be enough for disaster. Heck,it is not even sure the control rods would operate in such a condition. (Although I am sure that a special interests engineer will soon be around to assure us that nothing bad would happen)

2 ( +2 / -0 )

nandakandamanda: "I remember seeing land having risen in a sort of cliff in a running line across Awaji Island after the Hanshin Earthquake...."

You can STILL see where some buildings were pushed up out of the ground, and while it was of course a major earthquake it really wasn't a major fault shift in the grand scheme of things. Any major jikka-gata earthquake under a nuclear plant would be near instant meltdown. Sadly, that's what it's going to take before the government heeds common sense.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Okay, how about this... let them lie, redraw the maps, and build on faultlines BUT all plant operators and their families must live on and never leave the premeses.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

It seems there is pressure from greedy nuke village and companies for the hurried fault checks by so-called regulatory authority. The fear is that all reactors may soon be given an "all clear" to be restarted, claiming that the nuke plants have been discovered not to be sitting on active faults. Whether they sit or not on active faults is secondary. The fact and main concern is that the whole of Japan is in ring of fire and not fit for nuke plants. I hope the nuclear regulation authority does not turn into a nuclear promotion authority!??

2 ( +2 / -0 )

How about floating them like nuclear subs? Surly they operate with mownt at an angle?

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites