TOKYO —

Two family courts were divided in their responses last year to a request for arbitration in determining the paternity of a child whose registration with the local government has been rejected due to a controversial provision in the Civil Code, sources close to the matter said Sunday. The Tokyo Family Court had pressed a 32-year-old woman and her baby boy to withdraw their arbitration request to have the woman’s current husband recognized as the infant’s father, while the Yokohama Family Court did recognize the man as the father, the sources said.
   
The differing outcomes show the lack of consistency in the family courts’ handling of cases involving the provision, which says a child born within 300 days from the date of dissolution or cancellation of a marriage is deemed to have been conceived during the time the couple were married.
   
The woman had filed the arbitration requests with the two courts, seeking recognition that her current husband is the child’s father, without involving her former spouse in the court proceedings.
   
According to Masae Ido, a member of a group which supports families with unregistered children where the woman sought advice, the woman separated from her then husband in March 2007 and started dating the man who is her current husband.
   
She found herself pregnant in October that year, two months before the divorce from her former husband was granted, and remarried in June 2008, Ido said. The woman gave birth to her son in July last year, 212 days after her divorce.
   
In August, she filed an arbitration request with the Tokyo Family Court’s Hachioji branch, but a judge suddenly told her to withdraw it, the sources said.
   
Then, after moving, she filed a similar request with the nearby Yokohama Family Court’s Sagamihara branch. The court recognized the boy as the current husband’s child without involving the former husband in the case or requiring DNA tests, they said.
   
The woman and her current husband have expressed relief that the Yokohama court recognized their child’s paternity, but said they cannot understand why the two courts handled their case in a different manner, the sources said.

© 2009 Kyodo News. All rights reserved. No reproduction or republication without written permission.

› Login to comment

10 Comments

• 

  outofmydepth at 04:44 PM JST - 1st February

  DNA - duh!!!!!

• 

  kwatt at 06:22 PM JST - 1st February

  DNA test is the best way to clear everything. Japan has better technology of DNA but local government officials have ancient brain to determine things. They do not trust science.

• 

  Starviking at 07:12 PM JST - 1st February

  but said they cannot understand why the two courts handled their case in a different manner, the sources said.

  Easy, the Hachioji court got cold feet when they realised they'd have to make a decision based on common sense and compassion - not precedence. The Yokohama court used their wits.

• 

  gogogo at 07:17 PM JST - 1st February

  This is such a stupid case, it's so easy to fix why can't they just test and be done with it. Seems like they want people to divorce and do the paperwork straight away or something.

• 

  sharky1 at 08:47 PM JST - 1st February

  Cuz the Japanese family court system is one of the most jacked up court systems in the world.

• 

  the_sicilian at 10:12 PM JST - 1st February

  Oyaji no DNA wakaranai, ne?

  As those above have mentioned the family courts here are screwed up. I'd hate to get into something protracted with my wife. Sayonara kids....

  Ciao

• 

  GW at 10:13 PM JST - 1st February

  Japan is so damned primitive!

  Note to Jpn, you make many technological goodies................START BLOODY USING THEM!!

  Ahhhhhhhhhhh fogot we have to wait till the old LDPers kick the bucket, but even then can we expect progress in this kind of thinking, probably not.

• 

  Potsu at 11:14 PM JST - 1st February

  How ridiculous ! Utterely backward.

• 

  bamboohat at 12:11 AM JST - 2nd February

  if they used DNA, they might have to use "hard evidence" in other areas, like police work, and they don't want to do that..

• 

  Yelnats at 03:35 PM JST - 2nd February

  I think the police should go to the former husbands home, bring lots of card board boxes and, well you know. Collect stuff.

Register or Login to leave a comment