national

U.S. eases travel alert around Fukushima nuclear plant

53 Comments

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© Copyright 2011 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.

53 Comments
Login to comment

US advising its citizens to go closer to Fukushima (!) Instead they should ask them to go to New Fukushima (Osaka).

1 ( +4 / -3 )

@ some14some

Exactly,

1 ( +3 / -2 )

sorry - i would tend to believe the US advisories. they err on the side of caution.

3 ( +4 / -1 )

With all the plutonium, strontium, cesium etc. around the area. I personally think the US is just cosying up to Japan for some reason, it just looks like a political move on the US part. I don't think it has anything to do with health and welfare issues of US citizens in Japan.

Even in measuring Tokyo and Kanagawa for radiation levels it was done by helicopter 100 meters of the ground now who is going to believe those numbers the US of course.

http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2011/10/ministry-of-educations-radiation-map.html

4 ( +8 / -4 )

Environs-around the nuclear plant

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Even in measuring Tokyo and Kanagawa for radiation levels it was done by helicopter 100 meters of the ground now who is going to believe those numbers the US of course.

You don't think the US has the resources to do its own measuring? As I'm sure you know they have bases in Tokyo and Kanagawa and are without doubt monitoring radiation levels themselves.

3 ( +4 / -1 )

"The latest announcement said Americans saying for more than a year within that area should consult with local authorities on radiation levels."

The only part I TRULY disagree with; the local authorities WANT people to come there so that tourism suffers no further (that's a priority over radiation dangers).

3 ( +4 / -1 )

@ Apsara

You don't think the US has the resources to do its own measuring? As I'm sure you know they have bases in Tokyo and Kanagawa and are without doubt monitoring radiation levels themselves

Where is your proof? web-links would be nice.

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

US officials are obviously pandering to the Japanese government. No coincidence that this move to 'ease advice for travelers' comes on the same day that JT ran an article with the headline "Clinton: U.S.-Japan relationship remains a cornerstone alliance".

1 ( +3 / -2 )

2 ( +2 / -0 )

@ CrazyJoe

That's good for Camp Zama, 2 radiation detectors. I'm glad they are monitoring what they can, but it's not telling me about the radiation levels I mentioned being tested 100 meters in the air instead of ground level in Tokyo and Kanagawa.

1 ( +2 / -1 )

@Utrack At least I proved that US Forces are monitoring the radiation from Fukushima.

1 ( +2 / -1 )

Here is The Ministry maps, not a US map. of the strontium, plutonium fallout. I don't think anyone but qualified personnel should be with 60 to 80km of Daiichi

http://ajw.asahi.com/article/0311disaster/fukushima/AJ2011100112896

Now if I remeber Zichi's post. TEPCO is spraying 17000 tons of DECONTAMINATED water from the reactors water 1.2 meters outside and around the plant.

What's up with that? Is it supposed to make the area less radioactive? Really...

0 ( +1 / -1 )

First, why would anyone want to go anywhere near the area, and second, why would this even be safe to travel into? This easing is going to be used for a lot of propaganda. Thanks.

3 ( +3 / -1 )

Oh, well that's that! All that worrying for nothing!

1 ( +1 / -0 )

"US officials are obviously pandering to the Japanese government. "

"First, why would anyone want to go anywhere near the area, and second, why would this even be safe to travel into? This easing is going to be used for a lot of propaganda. Thanks

The U.S advice was always at odds with official Japanese decrees from the beginning and this is only issued to TRAVELERS. It's safe to travel because you're ONLY traveling to or through the area. Why is this concept so difficult to understand?

2 ( +3 / -1 )

I was told that Yokosuka Base, Atsugi Base, Yokota Base and Zama Camp all have measuring equipment of their own and do you think the U.S. would put it's millitary at undue risk for no gain. I don't think so and live fairly close to Atsugi and Zama so feel at ease regarding reported radiation around this area, when i see the U.S. pulling out of their bases then its time to worry.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

U.S. eases travel alert around Fukushima nuclear plant

They mean Japan?

-1 ( +1 / -2 )

That zone means nothing if they are transporting the contaminated soil and debris from fuk-u-shima to the rest of the country and spreading all the radiation. Food and produce is still coming out of there. It's insane!

1 ( +3 / -2 )

@ExportExpert

...do you think the U.S. would put it's millitary at undue risk for no gain?

For your answer just google the three words: Jinkanpo Atsugi Incinerator.

Over many years, to avoid offending their Japanese 'hosts' US officials turned a blind eye on the impact of at least one dioxin-spewing incinerator on the health of countless Atsugi Base families. The plant in question was old, operated improperly to cut costs, and spewed high levels of dioxin directly on to the Atsugi Base residential (family) area.

Although the US military and other US officials do try to diplomatically fight these issues behind the scenes, those efforts often do not take top priority, and it doesn't seem likely that they will publicize anything that makes waves.

1 ( +2 / -1 )

Well a paradigm shift may be in effect, people with good jobs and good pay (officers and GS 11 and above living on/off bases in Japan who have US medical and dental services, SOFA status and fairly decent paid military retirees w/base access in Japan are now living much better than most Japanese in Japan, particularly if a catastrophe occurs, they would be notified if radiation levels warrant evacuation, and probably be airlifted out much faster as well as US embassy staff in such an event......

3 ( +3 / -0 )

tigerguy is telling the truth

0 ( +1 / -1 )

Politics over safety. The US and UK are desperate to promote nuclear power, and so sacrifice the safety of people who dont matter to them at all, for the sake of profit and supporting fat cat big business.

Shame on them.

2 ( +4 / -2 )

The govt and TEMPCO don't care a bit about the well being of the people and the children's future. Little Fukushimas are happening all over the country when they incinerate the transported debris from there. They laugh at people complaining about the contaminated food when they themselves have evacuated their own families faraway from the danger zones. They know the truth but don't reveal it to the public. A silent genocide...

2 ( +3 / -1 )

It's all about business and money and currying favors. This decision makes no sense until the situation is completely under control.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

i wonder how much or what the Japanese Gov., give to the US for they to say this.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

No doubt sponsored by the Nuclear Lobby. You could possibly throw the eugenics crowd in there as well (John Holdren et al).

1 ( +2 / -1 )

In Britain, all my friends think life is totally back to normal here. Just as if the whole disaster never happened. My close family are following news coming out of Japan and know a lot different.

1 ( +3 / -2 )

@zichi - yes, the military families are back in japan and have been since july or so. they could not come back sooner because if they chose to leave japan (it was not mandatory) they had to stay where they went for a certain amount of time or it would have meant big bucks.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

That is NOT how CNN is running it:

http://edition.cnn.com/2011/10/07/world/asia/japan-us-travel-alert/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

The US is NOT easing anything.

0 ( +3 / -3 )

U.S. urges citizens to avoid area around stricken Japanese reactorsBy the CNN Wire Staff October 8, 2011 -- Updated 0021 GMT (0821 HKT)..............................

all depends on how you word the headline,

1 ( +2 / -1 )

@Sillygirl. Not all families have come back: stripes.com is a good source for info about what the US is doing.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

@zichi

The American decision does not seem to be based on scientific evidence or an improvement in the conditions within Fukushima Prefecture.

I agree. It's seems to be arbitrary and what can be gotten away with. Funny that within the space of a matter of days JT has headlines like:

"Contaminated soil found outside Fukushima no-go zone" (10/6)

"Radioactive ash causes Kashiwa incinerators to shut down" (10/4)

"Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant worker dies" (10/7)

But then a few days later it's "U.S. eases travel alert around Fukushima nuclear plant"

… like it's suddenly all getting back to normal. Doesn't make sense, at least from a normal perspective.

0 ( +2 / -2 )

@YongYang

Re. the CNN article you quoted; if you only read the headline it would seem that way. But a few paragraphs down it says...

The State Department alert offered different advice for those farther out from the plant, which it defined as between 20 and 80 kilometers. For "temporary visitors" making a trip a year, the U.S. government said that "health and safety risks ... are low and exposure does not pose significant risks."

Those who live in this zone for more than a year are being urged "out of an abundance of caution" to follow guidance from local authorities. Pregnant woman, children and elderly people should not stay within 30 kilometers (18 miles) of the plant, according to the U.S. alert.

And this:

(The accident) also prompted widespread evacuations, though no one is believed to have been killed by resulting radiation

... As if small but cumulative doses of radiation are going to kill people within a matter of months :/.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

@Weed: That, even if you read the whole article twice or three times, does not equate to easing, though. The Us has not 'eased'. Military personal are still not allowed to transit through the area, neither are bases accepting foodstuffs from the areas that they stopped importing from, no 'easing' and that is the rub.

1 ( +3 / -2 )

I live in Kashiwa (Northeast Chiba) that is one of the places called "Hot Spot". The city government sent us e-mail every other day giving us radiation level info. The level is usually around 0.4 microSv/hr from 5cm and 1m above ground. This level is said to be much higher than a normal level, even higher than some area of Minami Soma in Fukushima. A lot of people are freaking out, even CNN news interviewed a mother named Yuki Onishi who has been interviewed by the media and telling us what their major concern is, and what the mayor's reaction is like. She eventually left here for Okinawa with her two small children, but leaving her husband here in Kashiwa. I guess her husband has to work here. It has been on the news that Kashiwa has decided not to collect weed garbage because it is already full and they don't know what to do with it. I told my American friend about it and he said Denver, Colorado radiation level is around 0.6 microSv/hr all the time so there should be no worries with the radiation level 0.4microSv/hr. According to U.S. NRC "Currently Denver, Colorado is reading 64 CPM(o.64uSv/hr) as of 4:00pm MST 4/10/11. People residing in Colorado are exposed to more natural radiation than residents of the east or west coast because Colorado has more cosmic radiation at a higher altitude and more terrestrial radiation from soils enriched in naturally occurring uranium. (The "Alert Level" for the National Radiation Map is 100 CPM(1uSv/hr) Although Colorado has the highest average background radiation levels in the US, the state has some of the lowest cancer incidence and death rates in the country, around 10% below national levels." So if this information is true, I would be happy to tell my friends not to worry. Does anybody have any different info or anything, I would like to hear it. Thank you. (JT often delete unrelated comment to the topic. This is unrelated to U.S. ease traveling things. But It's all related to radiation leak from Fukushima. So I would appreciate if you don't delete my comment. Thank you.)

0 ( +1 / -1 )

A dose rate of 0.4 microsievert per hour equates to an annual dose of 3.5 millisievert-ish – which would typically double a person's exposure for a year. This would not concern me. BUT for children, not worth the risk. Keeping it as low as possible is the objective for MY children.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

@zichi Thank you for the information. Kashiwa, Nagareyama, and Abiko are called hot spots with the radiation level around 0.4microSv/hr. After the explosion on 3/12, the radiation particles were flying around in the sky with clouds. On 3/22, the clouds with the particles moved down south to Tokatsu area (kashiwa, nagareyama...) and the heavy rain dropped a large number of particles in the area. That's how Tokatsu area has become the hot spots. (according to several news report on Japanese media) Since then, people here are freaking out, especially mothers with small children. Kids are no longer playing in the play ground. A lot of my neighbors are not hanging their laundry out to dry...etc. 200 mothers visited the mayor and told him to do something about it. But they also don't know what to do. There are hundreds of huge bags of weed garbage in the clean center and the space is already full. So they are not going to collect those garbage any longer. There is a huge dispute going on between mothers and the mayor. The mayor said those mothers are overacting and the mothers are upset with the government's reaction. For me, Colorado radiation level story is very convincing since I have lived in the states before. But for other people, they don't care other country's radiation level. All what they worry about is 0.4microSv/hr is a lot higher than before 3.11 and the kids are now in high risk of cancer...etc. I really hope the city government or national government will tell us what level is risky and what is not to worry with scientific numbers and plain language.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

Are they testing for Neutron Radiation as well I wonder? It is not talked about by that name.

This link is for the Nuclear Tourist ( Radiation Safety ) page and the diagram on said page shows that radioactive neutrons are more penetrating than gamma radiation it even goes through lead and partially through cinder block.

http://www.nucleartourist.com/systems/rad.htm

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

@YongYang

I don't know what your definition of easing is but the following is from the US State Dept's web site. To me it reads like the AP headline says it is, an easing of the travel alert. Anyway the definition of 'easing' is not important. What is important is that the alert, which is "based on current data from Japan," seems to contradict reality; ie, "Contaminated soil found outside Fukushima no-go zone." etc. With this latest alert people who rely on the government and MSM for their news might well get a false sense of security if they decide to visit the area. In particular that applies to long-term residents who return or decide to stay on.

July 19, 2011 Travel Alert

While the situation at the Fukushima Daiichi plant remains serious and dynamic, the health and safety risks to land areas which are outside a 50-mile radius of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant are low and do not pose significant risks to U.S. citizens. Out of an abundance of caution, we continue to recommend that U.S. citizens avoid travel to destinations within the 50-mile evacuation zone of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant. U.S. citizens who are still within this zone should evacuate or shelter in place.

http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/pa/pa_5454.html

October 7, 2011 Travel Alert

Based on current data from Japan, we recommend that U.S. citizens avoid all areas within 20 kilometers of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant. In addition, U.S. citizens should avoid the area northwest of the plant that the Government of Japan has designated as the “Deliberate Evacuation Area.”

Government of Japan data measurements show varying levels of radiation in land areas outside of the area described above, but within 80 kilometers of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant. The U.S. government believes the health and safety risks to temporary visitors to these areas are low and exposure does not pose significant risks to U.S. citizens making visits of less than one year… […] … (W)e recommend that U.S. citizens who choose to reside for more than one year within 80 kilometers of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant consult with local authorities to receive current guidance…[…] In addition, pregnant women, children, and the elderly should avoid residing within 30 km of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant.

http://travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/pa/pa_5574.html

Military personal are still not allowed to transit through the area, neither are bases accepting foodstuffs from the areas that they stopped importing from

Obviously the area is still dangerous then -- the military must have all the testing equipment and latest data -- yet the State Dept's travel alert implies that the 20-80km zone (excluding the area northwest of the plant) is considered safer than what it was in July. So with caution it's now ok for citizens to travel or even live in this 20-80km zone, but it's still a no-go for the military even to transit through. Hmmm…

FWIW you should probably not take CNN as being different or more truthful than AP, say, or any of the other MSM outlets. They all speak for Leviathan in one way or another.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

@Weed: All that to say what I said. No easing.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Zichi,

I think it's been that way since babylon. You're right though that the politicians, scientists been showing their colours since 3/11. Their pimps - the nuke industry - chose well.

@YY, cut 'n paste - bold bits for you - no comprende?

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

This news is a bunch of BS! Fukushima is the last place anybody needs to visit now in Japan! No control really at Dai Ichi nuclear power plant Tepco only cares about $$$$$$$$$$!!!!!!!

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Japan needs to have a campaign to tell foreigners, "Believe me, Japan is the ideal vacation." The average American hardly knows where Japan is, let alone that it is 70% of California in land mass. One very small area in Japan has a problem. If the Japanese media would promote the other areas, tourism would return. An example is Baton Rouge in the USA. The media doesn't concentrate on Katrina, it shows the positive aspects and growth. ANA and others need to have a positive approach to the tourism, too. Government subsidized tickets or consumption tax exeptions/refunds would definitely help.

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites