Whaling commission adopts new financing rules
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
( 2 )
( 5 )
( 0 )
( 7 )
( 130 )
Order by Time Order by Popularity
11 Comments
Login to comment
-1
SquidBert
Wither you agree on Whaling or not. Animals are hunted, killed or slaughtered, not harvested.
0
NuckinFutz
Awww, poor Japan! Now its going so much harder to buy those votes!
2
Zenny11
Naah, poor nations that been offering their votes to the highest bidder hoping to get more aid, etc for their country. Remember last year a few pro-whaling nations offered to become anti-whaling hoping to better their lot.
Vote-buying happens on both sides. Just a fact.
Lets see what will happen to indigenous whaling after the meet, the USA has also been stepping on a few toes recently.
For the anti-whalers, whales taken by indigenous people are said to die slower and more painful than on the hands of the whaling nations. Plus, much of the whale is being thrown away or sold to other nations.
0
SquidBert
@Zenny11
Are you sure?, I Would definitely have believed it to be the other way around. It is usually not in the culture of these indigenous people to waste.
I am neither pro or anti whaling, but I do believe that anything taken out of international waters should be done with responsibility, considerance of sustainability and in accordance to internationally agreed upon rules.
0
MrDog
Oh maaan, now they'll have to give the cash to them before they pay the fees...
1
Cricky
Industrialized Whaleing and Indienous Whaling are separate issues. Sending a fleet of factory ships half way across the world, is not the same as hunting off the coast. With the history of over fishing and lies that the Japanese have, please who can trust them. When transparency is a problem? There is a problem.
2
Zenny11
Squidbert.
Well reported in the media. Many of those tribes will hunt the whale and let it rot on the Beach once the "Ritual Hunt" is over. Others use very modern equipment to hunt them and will offer a lot of that meat for sale afterwards, nothing traditional there besides taking the whale.
Hence why indigenous whaling and their licences are being reviewed at this meet.
I did post an article to BBC where ALL the points at the meet are mentioned as well as who is pro/con on each point.
And we agree, that a reasonable hunt that won't endanger/hurt a species is ok.
2
smithinjapan
"The proposal was adopted after Japan, Iceland and several Caribbean nations spent hours objecting to clauses and even individual words in the text,..."
Now why on earth would they object to the IWC payments being made more transparent... hmmmm...
1
smithinjapan
Anyway, it won't matter much; Japanese officials will still fly to the poor, land-locked nations to buy them hookers and wine and dine them before, lo-and-behold, the country suddenly has the money and votes in favour of whaling! Or officials from those nations will just come here and REALLY be shown a good time (and given the cash to transfer later).
0
Jason Thunderbeing
You were asked to cease and desist all whaling activity why didn't you listen Japan?I AM truley worried for your safety now their is a great storm coming to the south of Japan where the whalers villages are.i will still try to either move the typhoon or calm it.But i suggest that you evacuate southern japan and once again cease and desist all whaling activity.I love you Japan please heed this time.
0
Fadamor
Meh, most of the whales Japan takes are the Minke whale which isn't a threatened species. I don't see a reason for banning the taking of non-threatened species. Just because it's a mammal doesn't mean we have to leave it alone.
Back to top