Take our user survey and make your voice heard.

Here
and
Now

opinions

2016: Japan’s year of living dangerously?

16 Comments

Higher interest rates in the United States, a slowing Chinese economy, and a near-recession in Japan point to a mixed outlook for this nation in 2016. With the pressure mounting on Abenomics, how will the world’s third-largest economy survive in the Year of the Monkey?

Foreign pressure

“2015 was the year of the China slowdown — now you don’t find a single corporation, whether it’s in Japan or the United States, expecting high growth in China,” said Jesper Koll, CEO of WisdomTree Investments Inc Japan.

China’s slowdown from its previous double-digit growth rate continued in 2015, with third-quarter GDP data showing a 6.9 percent annualized expansion, representing the slowest pace since 2009. Chinese government think tank the State Information Center has predicted GDP growth of only 6.5 percent this year. But Koll says 2016 could actually be a better year than expected for the world’s second-largest economy, should Beijing deliver greater fiscal and monetary stimulus.

“While 2015 was the year of revising down expectations, 2016 could actually become the year of revising up, because the leadership in China is stimulating the economy. You’re seeing interest rate cuts and you’re very likely also to see stimulative fiscal policy. Japan’s [Prime Minister Shinzo] Abe and China’s President Xi Jinping actually have a lot in common in the sense that they both are using monetary and fiscal policy to stabilize their economies,” he said.

Softer growth in China has also weighed on Asia’s emerging markets, with Southeast Asia expected to bear the brunt of the slowdown. Nevertheless, in its latest outlook, the Asian Development Bank (ADB) said the region’s developing economies would expand by 6 percent in 2016, led by India, which is tipped to post 7.8 percent GDP growth this year.

The official birth of the ASEAN Economic Community on December 31, 2015, should spur greater interregional trade, with estimates of a 7 percent boost to aggregate output by 2025. For Japan, Abe’s promises to up the ante on the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank with $110 billion of regional financing, together with the ADB, should ensure more orders for Japanese machinery and other exports.

The year of the dollar

The US Federal Reserve’s policy tightening announced December 16 should progress further in 2016, spurring capital flight toward dollar-denominated assets and putting upward pressure on the dollar rather than the yen. However, not all expect the yen to weaken significantly, with Morgan Stanley predicting that the yen will actually strengthen to ¥115 against the greenback by the end of the year, compared with the median analyst forecast for the Japanese currency to weaken to ¥126, according to Bloomberg News.

Yet, should US wage growth start accelerating, economists suggest the Fed could abandon its proposed gradual path for a quicker pace of rate hikes. Conversely, as a “safe haven” currency, the Japanese yen is at risk of strengthening in any international crisis, such as a major terrorist incident or geopolitical shock.

Cheaper energy to continue

One shock not expected in 2016 is energy. Coal, gas, and oil prices are forecast to remain low this year amid continued oversupply, delivering a further free kick to growth for import-dependent Japan.

Brent crude slumped to a six-year low of $37.75 a barrel last August, amid estimates the global market is oversupplied by as much as 2 million barrels a day, helped by surging output from both OPEC and non-OPEC members.

Meanwhile, a glut in liquefied natural gas of an extra 130 million tons per year over the next five years should see Asian gas prices sink even lower, according to researcher Wood Mackenzie. Coal prices also tumbled to 12-year lows in 2015, delivering another headwind to Japan following the shutdown of its nuclear power industry.

Cheaper energy is expected to cut Japan’s trade deficit by around 2 percent of GDP, while lower prices should boost GDP for fiscal 2015 (ending March 31, 2016) by around 0.5 percent, according to the Daiwa Institute of Research.

Abenomics 2.0

Japan’s near-miss with recession in 2015 gave Abenomics critics plenty of ammunition, although stronger growth is expected this year. In September, Abe announced a reboot for Abenomics that includes a growth target of ¥600 trillion ($5 trillion) by 2020, maintaining a 100 million-strong population for the next 50 years, and enhanced social security measures, with a goal of expanding the labor force through inclusion of more female and elderly workers.

Government ministers have pointed to record corporate profits, rising wages, and the tightest labor market in 23 years as evidence that the anticipated virtuous cycle is finally kicking in, while rising tax revenue aids planned fiscal consolidation efforts.

The announcement of the second stage of Abenomics offered a raft of reforms, ranging from increased use of information technology, reform of the medical and healthcare industries, and measures to attract more inward foreign direct investment.

Tax reform is also on the agenda, with Tokyo aiming to cut the corporate tax rate to below 30 percent by 2018, even with a planned consumption tax rate increase to 10 percent a year earlier.

Abe also bolstered the economy by announcing a ¥3.5 trillion supplementary budget for fiscal 2015, with about one-third of that amount to be spent on measures to “dynamically engage” all citizens in society, along with funds to help farmers boost competitiveness following the launch of the Trans-Pacific Partnership free trade pact.

Growth upturn?

While both the International Monetary Fund and OECD expect Japan to post a modest 1 percent GDP gain in 2016, WisdomTree’s Koll says Japan could reach 1.7 percent, driven by stronger housing and private consumption.

“Twenty-fifteen was weaker than expected, primarily because of business investment, with businesses continuing to invest more overseas rather than returning to their home market,” he said. “A bright spot in 2015 was housing, and housing investment has been increasing now for three consecutive quarters . . . a very good leading indicator for stronger consumption into 2016.”

William Sposato, former Wall Street Journal and Dow Jones deputy bureau chief in Tokyo, said signs have emerged of a change in inflationary expectations, including such indicators as “core-core” inflation figures and a rising number of fixed-rate, compared to variable-rate, mortgages, which suggest home buyers think rock-bottom interest rates may be on the rise.

“Barring anything unforeseen, which would probably come in the military sphere, I think we’ll see fairly good growth . . . of around 1 to 1.5 percent, and [BOJ Governor Haruhiko] Kuroda will get to where he wants to go, eventually. So you’ll see solid growth, particularly in the big cities, and some turnaround in the countryside if foreign investment continues.

“Property prices outside the big cities are incredibly cheap by global standards, and Asians—not just Chinese but Singaporeans and Taiwanese—are coming to realize this, and that could provide a nice tailwind,” he said.

Entrepreneur Hitoshi Suga, who is a special advisor to the president of Tully’s Coffee Japan Co., Ltd. and a visiting professor at Akita International University, suggests Japanese companies will enjoy an improved competitive position in 2016. “The Japanese yen has weakened in recent years compared to the Chinese renminbi and [South] Korean won, giving a competitive edge to Japanese exports. Japan still has a competitive advantage in the United States and Southeast Asia, and that may maintain the momentum of the Japanese economy, even though many companies are suffering from China’s downturn,” he said.

One sector of Japanese business expecting gains in the Year of the Monkey is the underwear industry, which is promoting red underwear to bring health and good luck. Amid a cloudy outlook, Asia’s economic heavyweights of Japan and China might share a love for the same color in 2016.

Custom Media publishes The Journal for the American Chamber of Commerce in Japan.

© Japan Today

©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.

16 Comments
Login to comment

So, if we can believe this, it's onwards and upwards. And red underwear too in the year of the monkey. Nice!

1 ( +2 / -1 )

Personally, I would like to see $1 = ¥150

-5 ( +0 / -5 )

Personally, I would like to see $1 = ¥150

Personally, that would make me a lot richer. My company income would increase by millions of yen if it went from 120 -> 150, and I'd significantly increase the bonus I pay myself a couple of times a year. But it would be worse for the country as a whole, and hurt the economy even more. So I'd rather not see it go in that direction.

I think ¥100 = $1 is a good number.

0 ( +3 / -3 )

"But it would be worse for the country as a whole, and hurt the economy even more."

I don't know who you can be so certain of that. A much cheaper yen would make Japan's exports more competitive, inflate its corporate profits earned overseas and help achieve the govt's inflation target. As companies see earnings rise. they'd be under even greater pressure to raise workers' wages.

-5 ( +0 / -5 )

A much cheaper yen would make Japan's exports more competitive, inflate its corporate profits earned overseas and help achieve the govt's inflation target.

Which would put more money in the company coffers, almost none of which will ever see the pockets of the workers. Trickle down economics don't work - even in Japan.

The people had more purchasing power when the yen was strong than when it's weak. Imports cost more now, which has raised prices, making the spending power of the people go down. This means less spending by the people, so less money going into companies that do not rely on exports (which is the majority of companies in the country).

A weak yen only helps the large exporters, and within them, only really benefits the executives.

2 ( +5 / -3 )

Stranger. When the Yen was stronger, were the people spending more? Nope. So you are wrong on that aspect. Also, corporate heads do not make take in the same salaries as those CEO's of foreign companies.

150 to 1 would be great.

-4 ( +1 / -5 )

"A weak yen only helps the large exporters, and within them, only really benefits the executives."

Pretty simplistic view there. What about the hundreds of domestic suppliers nationwide to those companies that export? I don't recall that working people were all that well off when the yen was stronger, or that living standards were any higher.

Also, Japan's retail sector is booming from the foreign tourism trend, to cite one of many, many other examples. One of the pulls is Japan has becoming affordable for people overseas.

-2 ( +2 / -4 )

There really has been and will not be any rise in wages. Been though companies are doing well it is NOT benefitting the little guy.

1 ( +2 / -1 )

Companies have only done better in yen terms. Often noted is that export volumes haven't increased. They have just gone down in value in foreign currency terms, up in yen terms.

Profits that are merely inflated in yen terms is not a strong signal for business to go invest and pay staff more, when your volumes haven't changed.

Companies will pay more when their staff start quitting to work elsewhere. How does the government go about creating such competition for labour? This is what they need to try to address, rather than taking lame shortcuts, socialist banana republic style.

3 ( +5 / -2 )

JeffLee: Agreed

-4 ( +1 / -5 )

2016 will be the year of status-quo. Not much is going to happen in business or economics until after the US elections next November. Nations, companies, and investors will not put out their sails until they know which way the wind is going to blow.

But Koll says 2016 could actually be a better year than expected for the world’s second-largest economy, should Beijing deliver greater fiscal and monetary stimulus.

Ah yes, another Marxist-economist who thinks that what has failed in nearly every country (most notably, Japan) which has tried it will somehow work in China. All China needs is their stock market to be pumped more full of hot air than it already is. China has already tweaked, twisted, and tortured it's economy into pretzels, if simply printing more currency and chopping interest rates were viable options, these things would have been done already. I would love to know what China's growth rate really is, it is certainly nowhere near 6.9%, probably not even 5%. Were the growth numbers even remotely accurate we wouldn't see capital leaving China as quickly as it has been.

2 ( +3 / -1 )

When the Yen was stronger, were the people spending more? Nope.

I don't recall that working people were all that well off when the yen was stronger

It's interesting. Some people argue that the huge 3% hike in consumption tax, effectively robbing people of 3% of their purchasing power, has caused a huge drop in consumption.

However the yen dropped in value against the US dollar by some 30% due in large part to Abenomics... yet we are to believe that this 30% depreciation has no effect on their spending at all, and indeed they are better off now that the yen they spend and are paid in is weaker?

At least their labour is more internationally competitive helping to keep them employed... but that's not through increased productivity, only reduced cost in foreign currency terms.

What about the hundreds of domestic suppliers nationwide to those companies that export?

The exporters are not exporting greater volumes, just the value of the yen has gone down. The domestic suppliers will be supplying the same volumes, for the same prices.

However some sectors, such as Japan's inefficient agriculture sector will have done well, because the weaker yen makes the local produce more competitive locally versus foreign imports.

But I'm not sure that Japan boosting it's farming industry is its best path forward. I'd rather the country moved up the value chain by getting smarter and better, rather than just trashing the value of the currency to keep people ploughing paddy fields.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

"Some people argue that the huge 3% hike in consumption tax, effectively robbing people of 3% of their purchasing power, has caused a huge drop in consumption."

The difference is that one has an upside (healthier businesses), the other doesn't. Look at consumption stats soon before and after the tax hike, and you'll see evidence of the serious damage that idiotic move caused.

1 ( +2 / -1 )

If a weak currency were healthy for businesses then Zimbabwe must have had the healthiest businesses in the history of the world. In Japan's case a 30% increase in import costs for companies with US dollar priced inputs was not, I would suggest, so healthy for them.

In consumption stats, I see evidence of people doing what I did - stocking up on items soon before the hike, so as to not need to buy those same items afterwards. But looking beyond the blip, in last year's final tax revenue numbers, I see evidence of the government pulling in 16 trillion yen in consumption tax revenues, as opposed to the 15.3 trillion they had budgeted for, and up more than 5 trillion on the year prior to the hike. No damage is apparent in those numbers, at least (not that I claim it was good for the economy, but that was not the purpose in the first place).

The idiocy has been in Japanese governments persisting to spend money that they don't have, on causes that don't provide commensurate returns, thus eventually necessitating such tax hikes. If the government didn't spend it in the first place, people wouldn't have had to start paying more for it.

1 ( +2 / -1 )

Aren't you forgetting that the US is the largest debtor nation in the history of the world? Also, Japan has the highest debt to GDP ratio of any industrialized country in the world? I guess you're of the Keynesian mantra that debt doesn't matter.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

"I guess you're of the Keynesian mantra that debt doesn't matter."

Many of the anti-Keynesians said Japan was supposed to default or at least suffer serious debt-related shocks a while back. They have been consistently wrong. Why?

Some also said the same of the US since Obama took office. Point to me evidence that the fiscal debts are harming economic health.

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites