History’s harsh lessons
The Second World War in many ways shaped the world we live in. It sealed the fate of the British Empire. It saw the rise of the United States, and then the Soviet Union, to superpower status, precipitating an age of nuclear confrontation that, even years after the end of the Cold War, is still a source of anxiety and conflict. It spurred a movement towards European union. In the Far East, with the defeat of the Japanese, it paved the way for the rise of modern China and embedded its distrust of the West. It also gave birth to the United Nations, which, for all its arguable effectiveness, was inspired by a belief in the possibility of a better world.
Now, in the midst of alarming global instability – social, political, and economic – it is understandable that people look again at the Second World War as a cautionary tale, one that can alert us to danger signals and perhaps offer useful signposts towards a more peaceful future. That, at least, is the optimistic viewpoint. Others might argue that we’ve learned little from history’s greatest human tragedy and are blindly headed toward another global conflict.
If it’s any comfort, I’m convinced that history never repeats itself. Nothing in human affairs is inevitable. Yet, I do believe we need to understand the past to make better sense of what’s happening around us now. And we must avoid the temptation to generalize or draw bogus parallels. The Second World War was a complex business and our understanding of it must be equally nuanced.
We tend, for example, to reduce the war to a battle among major powers. More accurately, it was a conglomeration of conflicts. Some were Great Power conflicts. All, to a certain degree, were influenced by what you could characterize as an international civil war between the polarized extremes of communism and fascism, or communism and Nazism.
The sheer brutality of the Second World War, a war in which civilians suffered more than uniformed combatants, can only be understood in terms of the process of ideologically fueled dehumanization that preceded it – nationalism, stirred to a fever pitch by totalitarian regimes extolling racism as a virtue. The rise of those totalitarian regimes was itself a function of popular discontent, fomented by grim economic conditions, high levels of unemployment, and a sense of hopelessness.
Despite the similarities with the world today, it’s unlikely that we’re heading toward another conflict of global scale. Europe, in any case essentially demilitarized, is not going to erupt into armed conflict, however much debtor countries unhelpfully try to vilify prosperous Germany by evoking memories of its Nazi past.
Where events in Europe might play out badly is in Asia, where the knock-on effect in China is potentially huge. The Chinese leadership is terrified of any form of internal unrest. The internal contradictions of the regime have been sustainable in a period of rapid economic growth, but if that growth were halted, the easiest diversionary tactic would be external aggression. It explains why the United States is deploying 60% of its naval resources to the Pacific. General Martin E Dempsey, Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff, has openly stated that he’s deeply concerned about developments in the Far East.
The other areas of dangerous volatility are North Africa and the Middle East. There, we see a disturbing brew of colliding ideologies – political and religious – combined with rapid population growth, economic stagnation and high rates of youth unemployment. The resulting magma of anger, frustration, and impatience could easily erupt into violence, particularly if manipulated by external powers intent on fighting proxy wars to secure favorable access to the region’s oil.
Perhaps the Second World War’s most important lesson is a moral one. Even in the midst of the most horrifying conditions, on all sides, there were those who never let go of their fundamental belief in humanity. Their example is something worth upholding as we struggle to resolve the profoundly disturbing challenges and potential conflicts of the world today.
Order by Time Order by Popularity
10 Comments
Login to comment
0
gaijinfo
We're involved in a war right now. A worldwide currency war. There were two of them before. One ended in two world wars. The second ended peacefully. Who knows how the third will end. Probably with bankrupt governments and lots of unhappy people without jobs. The subsequent shooting war will be the people of the world vs. the governments of the world.
1
edojin
Says Antony Beevor: "I’m convinced that history never repeats itself." He doesn't forsee another WWII. In disagreeing with both thoughts, in brief, there's always the fear of a WWIII ... something that will make WWII look like just a big battle. History has been filled with wars ... all kinds of wars ... and in some form or other they are still going on today. Someday somewhere down the road, another Hitler-like person might arise in a different form and lead his/her people to only God knows what.
Wars ... they've been with us since the beginning and they will always be with us ... like it or not.
0
GW
For example?????
0
Tom Webb
We have plenty of idiots, leaders of North Korea and Iran, are good examples. It is not that we cannot learn from history, but rather some people think that they are different from previous idiots. War, military or economic, will be fought over and over again. Let's hope it is a short and swift war that we fight.
1
David L Reinke
As the historian John Toland wrote in the introduction to his seminal work, The Rising Sun - The Decline And Fall Of The Japanese Empire 1936-45:
"I have done my utmost to let the events speak for themselves, and if any conclusion was reached, it was that there are no simple lessons in history, that it is human nature that repeats itself, not history. We often learn more about the past from the present, in fact, than the reverse.”
0
Ranger_Miffy2
Re: "fundamental belief in humanity"...I'm sure the dinosaurs also sported a fundamental belief in dinosaurs.
For me, I fundamentally believe that it will be a miracle if humanity survives long term. So far, many good people are quite able to soil their nests (the air, oceans, etc.) without end.
2
Fadamor
Mr. Beevor states:
If that were true, we would have never had to start applying Roman numerals to our world wars.
1
Johannes Weber
I doubt that both World Wars can really be compared. The starting conditions and reasons were very different. While WW 1 was just a matter of time (if not started by Austria and joined by foolish German nobility, someone else would have), WW 2 was completely different, very much a consequence of fascism and nacism on their peak, which in turn were greatly boosted by the lack of inner-european political equilibrium. The conditions for the countries which had lost WW 1 were basically dragging them down economically so much that recovery was impossible and the rise of fanatic worldviews was almost a natural consequence. Based on similar grounds, the rise of islamism and the tea party movement can be understood. Europe learned its lesson and kept the results of WW 2 in line wihtout burdening central Europe well beyond any possible recovery. Another Europe-based war is impossible to imagine (at least not with the old participants) and the driving forces for global conflicts reside in other parts of the world since then.
0
Ninoh
These wars are concocted by the banks and investors, it's all about making money, regardless of who wins and loose. We're all slaves to the system. Wake UP!
0
JTDanMan
Yeah, not really sure what this guy is trying to say.
Anyway, the most important lesson of WWII: power abhors a vacuum.
Back to top