Sanctions: A popular weapon with mixed results
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
( 5 )
( 0 )
( 4 )
( 1 )
( 2 )
Order by Time Order by Popularity
2 Comments
Login to comment
0
AiserX
He makes it sound as if this is some new trend from the past 50 years or so. The reason Japan attacked the U.S in pearl harbor was because of U.S steel and nat resource sanctions forced upon Japan. That along with blockades. Sanctions always lead to wars.
There is some merit to what these dictators say. Why should Cuban cigars be banned in the U.S when smokers highly desire them? Why should the U.S Gov sue a British bank because it does legitimate deals in Iran? Why should those in Country A be subject to the trade laws of Country B when trading with Country C?
The second half of the problem i these dictatorships is a lack of free-markets.< https://mises.org/daily/4594/Unintended-Consequences-of-Trade-Sanctions >
1
lostrune2
Not much of a fan of sanctions myself. Prefer they go straight to war, skip the dance and just fight and be over with it, hahaha.
If the US fully supported the Bay of Pigs invasion, this issue would've been over decades ago.
Back to top