Sunday May 27, 2012

When kids become murderous

TOKYO —

Those who lived in Japan at the time will never forget it.

In 1997, a 14-year-old boy from Kobe decapitated an 11-year-old boy, left his head on the gate of a school with a cryptic message in his mouth, then went on to bludgeon a 10-year-old girl to death. He was put away for six years, and released at the age of 21 without any comment or details.

According to an AP report, the boy had received psychiatric counseling and vocational training at two reformatory schools and the justice minister said that efforts to rehabilitate the youth (whose name was never officially disclosed) had achieved results.

The same year, a 12-year-old schoolgirl in Nagoya was stabbed to death during lunchtime at her school by an 11-year-old boy. Media reports concurred that she suffered a wound to the neck, though others claimed she had cuts all over her body. The little girl was pronounced dead on the scene.

At a time of rising juvenile crime, the crimes sparked heated debate in the Diet and the result was the lowering of the age of criminal responsibility from 16 to 14.

The question arises, however, as to the effectiveness of lowering the criminal age as a deterrent to crime. In general, the idea of having harsh penalties is to encourage would-be criminals to weigh the benefits of committing the crime with the cost of the punishment.  The problem is many children and adolescents who commit crimes suffer from impulse control problems that rob them of the ability to understand the consequences of their behavior in the first place. As a result, tough laws may get them off the street after they commit the crime, but won’t stop them from committing them.

In addition, there is periodic debate on just how far to go in lowering the age of adult sentencing. The same year the age was lowered to 14, an 11-year-old boy from Amagasaki in Hyogo was held on suspicion of stabbing his mother to death during a jostle after she found him trying to commit suicide. No charges could be leveled against him because he was below the minimal sentencing age.

Although juvenile felonies represent only a small portion of convictions, sensational stories usually lead to debate over the appropriateness of harsher sentencing, not better mental health screening.

I have no doubt that the latest case will reignite the debate.

Just last month, a 16-year-old boy slashed a 15-year-old high school girl in Misato, Saitama Prefecture, then a few weeks later, stabbed an 8-year-old girl not so far away in Matsudo, Chiba.

When he was picked up by police, he had a switchblade knife and a machete in his bag. He was quoted by police as saying that he wanted to commit murder. After his arrest, a collection of 20 bladed weapons were found in his home.

As is the case when similar stories occur anywhere in the world, it’s hard for people not to wonder, “Shouldn’t the kid’s parents have been able to pick up on any telltale clues that something was wrong?” Should the boy have been able to stockpile that many weapons right under his parents’ nose?

According to reports, he was attending a correspondence school. We might speculate (and it is speculation), that he could have had trouble getting along with his peers or been removed from school for a reason.

The truth is, we don’t know – and we don’t even know whether or not he was in the process of getting help. What we do know is that, fortunately, thanks to a report by local residents of a boy with a knife being seen on the street, and surveillance camera footage, he was caught pretty quickly.

One may wonder, though, how common are crimes like this. Actually, they’re not. The juvenile arrest rate in Japan is 13 per 1,000 people, but this includes mainly petty crimes. Vicious crimes consist of only 1% of these. A total of about 3,000 juveniles are sentenced to reformatory centers a year, for crimes which include assault, extortion and drug use. 

As for the system of juvenile incarceration, inmates receive a type of daily counseling and guidance called “mendan,” which is a type of “intimate personal interaction.” During the process, the teacher takes notes on any changes in the student’s character and attitude.

In addition, some centers have started to introduce social skills training and cognitive behavior therapy. There is also a type of group therapy called “Home Room Hour” in which the students talk about their “attitudes” and how to correct them. There are other uniquely Japanese therapies, which involve self-reflection, as well as “Naikan-ho” in which the students reflect on how to develop a proper societal role.

The goal of rehabilitation is to lead to “shokuzaikan”—penal reform as defined by the reshaping of self, mind and purification in learning how to view the crime that was committed from a different perspective.

All of this, however, misses the mark, in my opinion. The concept of imprisonment as a time for “purification” and “reshaping of attitude” may be sensible, but does it truly get around to the root of the psychological, neurological or socio-environmental sickness that led the child to behave in such a way? True, it is an infinite leap from beating the badness out of naughty little boys and girls, but is it modern?

Furthermore, there is the issue of prevention versus rehabilitation. While Japanese public schools currently have counselors, they are usually only available one day a week. The question arises whether teachers are adequately trained to “red flag” problems, bring them to the counselor’s office and make sure adequate resources are made available to prevent tragedies before they occur.

We need to think deeply about this if our aim is to have a society that not only raises healthy children, but also allows those who are in most need of help to get it before it is too late. 

Author Infomation

Eddie Landsberg
Eddie Landsberg
Eddie Landsberg is a writer, musician and reviewer who's lived and taught in Japan for 17 years. He presents stories and interviews on a wide range of topics related to changing Japanese society. He's recorded three internationally distributed CDs as a Hammond organist. Among his hobbies shogi, dog training and collecting R&B.
Website: http://www.facebook.com/eddie.landsberg1
  • 0

    Johannes Weber

    Good article, Eddie!

    Prevention requires that one admits to the existence of a fundamental, deep-rooted problem. I cannot see that Japanese society is ready for that. If there were preventive measures for such violent crimes, they would have to start at the level of IJIME already.

    But many people believe that IJIME is the natural way how things are. Or that everyone has to go through such hell. Killing another kid is just one or two steps futher on the track of IJIME. You cannot prevent the killing because it is only the final step. Stop IJIME in the beginning and violent crimes (among youths) will decrease. This logic applies to all countries. It is independent of family background, school performance and culture.

    They say in Japan that "the nail that sticks out is hammered down". If You stick out, You're made feeling guilty. Which leads to antisocial behaviour (either aggressive or withdrawn). If someone else sticks out, one might feel compelled that she is supposed to "hammered down". Which might often lead to IJIME and violence.

    Forget about harmony - and society will become more harmonious. This is a secret the Japanese moral education system has yet to learn.

  • -4

    NeverSubmit

    They get their ideas from TV, anime and Manga

  • -2

    Ayler

    They get their ideas from TV, anime and Manga

    gullible nonsense

  • -3

    southsakai

    The question arises, however, as to the effectiveness of lowering the criminal age as a deterrent to crime. In general, the idea of having harsh penalties is to encourage would-be criminals to weigh the benefits of committing the crime with the cost of the punishment. The problem is many children and adolescents who commit crimes suffer from impulse control problems that rob them of the ability to understand the consequences of their behavior in the first place. As a result, tough laws may get them off the street after they commit the crime, but won’t stop them from committing them.

    The consequences and punishment of such behaviour ( Murder ) should be kept short and simple. One that commits murder upon another human being should be fully held accountable for his/her actions and executed. ( Preferably in the same manner that the criminal murdered his or her victim(s) )

    This is just punishment for cases when one is found guilty beyond all reasonable doubt. If not, lock them up forever with no parole. Murderers have absolutely no right to be back into society, If they can't control their impulses, too darn bad.

    What justice is given to the victim when he or she is murdered and the murderer walks free after 6 years, 10 years, ?? That is absolutely stupid. Give the murderer to the victims families to deal with. Sometimes tribal justice is the best form if justice.

  • 0

    lucabrasi

    @southsaki

    This is just punishment for cases when one is found guilty beyond all reasonable doubt. If not, lock them up forever with no parole

    Do you realise what your saying here? So if someone is not found guilty "reasonable doubt" (that's called "innocent" in the legal world), they should be locked up forever? You're joking,right?

  • 0

    lucabrasi

    "beyond reasonable doubt".

  • -3

    NetNinja

    I really liked your article Eddie. Thanks. I'll chime in when you get to a topic that hits closer to home for me.
    This is good.

  • 0

    oginome

    The Junko Furuta case is the most shocking, disturbing case I've heard of in Japan related to youth crime. Those boys were all 16-18 when they did what they did, and they all walk free today, except for one who re-offended, but no doubt he'll be out again soon.

  • -2

    Ayler

    Thanks. I'll chime in when you get to a topic that hits closer to home for me.

    Ooooh intriguing. When you have something closer to home than the future of Japan and base violence inherent in the human race be sure to post as fast as your fingers allow. Failing that just run through the streets and shout it really loudly. If it's that important the Yaki-Imo man will probably turn his truck off for a minute or at least point you towards the nearest wi-fi spot.

  • -1

    thepersoniamnow

    Serial Killers Spree Killers Psychopaths

    I find it a little ridiculous to not immediately consider whether or not a child who has a knife collection and goes about looking for blood is not a potential killer. Even if you don't want to admit it, it seems quite apparant that killer make up a certain percentage of humans altogether. They have no remorse because there is nothing to be sorry about in their minds -They are in fact, human predators. These killers are in ever society, all over the world. You'd think that by now the judicial system would realise that a potential serial killer will kill again, so its always incredible to me when they are released. The sooner humans learn to judge people scientifically and not based on old ways of thinking will we do the right thing in these cases.

  • -1

    Nicky Washida

    Didnt they say onthe news that the boy who was attending correspondance school was barred from the school for bringing in bits of dead animals (cats I think it was) that he had killed and butchered?

    How much training does a teacher need to know that this indicates a potentially serious problem? Even if the parents were somehow unable to spot the 20 knives stockpiled in the house, wouldnt this have been a major wake up call that their son has a problem?

    I dont know if the family were seeking any help for their son or not. I am very relieved he was caught before he DID manage to kill someone. But I am very interested in what this family is like - I am not a psychiatrist but I would guess that these parents have some pretty major issues themselves to have raised a child like this. Nature or nurture? I think both and when certain natural conditions are right, the wrong kind of nurturing can produce this result. Thats why I think in juvenile crime situations such as these, the entire family should be receiving therapy, not just the child.

  • -1

    LH10

    i think anyone that commits murder should get a death sentence doesn't matter how old you are. scary story @_@ read in the paper, some 13yr old kid strangled a 3/4yr old to death with a skipping rope WTH

  • -1

    MaboDofuIsSpicy

    A killer is a killer and cannot be rehabilitated.

  • -3

    Frungy

    but is it modern?

    What an idiotic thing to say. Of course it is modern. This approach is very modern in Japan. ... unless Mr. Landsberg you MEANT to say, "but is it the modern approach in the West?". Either way the comment is idiotic, the only real question is, "Is it effective?".

  • 0

    LoveNot

    I recommend the book or the movie "Confessions" to whom have not read/seen it yet. It deals with child crimes. Some children want to become famous by committing a crime like the kids in the above article. Everybody in Japan know these crimes and talked about the perpetrators for a long time...Some kids view these criminals as heroes....

Login to leave a comment

OR

Follow us

More in Opinions

View all

View all