Another Hooters for Osaka
Picture of the Day ( 25 )
Hooters girls and their trainers pose for a photo during a pre-opening event for the chain’s second restaurant in Osaka which opens on Wednesday night across from Kinokunia Book Store near Honmachi Station. Japan Today’s Kamasami Kong was brought to Osaka to MC the event (photo below).
Order by Time Order by Popularity
25 Comments
Login to comment
0
theeastisred
Strictly on a point of grammar, shouldn't that be:
'More Hooters for Osaka'?
-3
slumdog
Certainly makes me want to hoot!
5
papigiulio
Hey thats near my work. goodbye salary!
1
tokyo-star
Yummy.....buffalo wings
-1
cracaphat
Finally some talent looks wise coming to Osaka lol.
1
WA4TKG
Is it just ME that notices only four of them are actually LOOKING at the Camera ?
0
Fadamor
If it's like most publicity deals, there are about five or six photographers all trying to get them to look their way. I'm not surprised it appears they're looking in different directions.
0
slumdog
I noticed it as well. I just assumed it was a photo op and that there were other photographers taking photos from different spots at the same time.
0
Serrano
Just what Osaka needs!
The trainers are the four in the black tank tops, right?
2
Kabukilover
Healthy looking ladies. Bet they don't eat at Hooters.
-1
splksgt96
Are there any Japanese here?
0
TokyoGas
I went to the one in Ginza. The place was just OK for me, but they do seem to get a lot of business.
0
Lowly
I dunno, they look kinda... what's a good word?
Anyway, not my cup a exciting.
3
smithinjapan
I'm there at some point. But seriously... the whole 'little' erect-like thing on their money pouch is a bit gratuitous.
-2
philly1
If anyone actually reads this far...
If the meaning is Hooters (a proper noun and the name of the business which is singular) another is correct. If the meaning is hooters (a slang expression, a noun referring to female body parts in the plural as there are usually two per person) then more would be correct. Many points of grammar depend on usage in this way. Therefore; the headline is correct.
-2
kobebomb
Yum yum! I'll have the (chicken) breast and thighs.
1
gelendestrasse
Ah yes, but we'd rather be incorrect when it comes to Hooters, eh?
1
Fadamor
That "erect-like thing" on the pouch to the right is just the pen they use to write down the orders. The one on the left is just the pouch rotated 90 degrees counter-clockwise, so the "erect-like thing" is actually the word "HOOTERS" printed on the pouch.
0
Ranger_Miffy2
More devaluation of women. Notice lots of references here in Comments to "girls"...but, have at it, guys. Sad.
0
slumdog
It is possible to both respect a person and admire their attractiveness. Why should that be a sad thing. If this were a photo of a group of male waiters and people wrote 'boys', which they often do, would you similarly find it sad? Why the unnecessary double standard?
2
smithinjapan
Fadamor: "That "erect-like thing" on the pouch to the right is just the pen they use to write down the orders. The one on the left is just the pouch rotated 90 degrees counter-clockwise, so the "erect-like thing" is actually the word "HOOTERS" printed on the pouch."
Forgive me, and thanks for the explanation. I'm still a Hooter's virgin with thoughts in the gutter.
0
ebisen
In this world there are two types of men: those that visited Hooters at least once, and those that did not (yet).
1
davestrousers
Yes, and thankfully I'm still one of those that haven't gone yet. When I get old and my looks start to go and I can't get any real interaction with attractive women, then I might go.
0
cracaphat
I went to Hooters with two mates on the 28th Dec.What false advertising.There were NO foreign female staff.Though the website was touting them. Food was pretty good,girls were ma ma,using their selling points as best as they could.And the music the 80s.My wife had suggested to go cuz the food interested her.But after doing so,I told her we ain't going to that sleaze bucket of a dive.
Back to top