picture of the day

Long journey

39 Comments

In this photo provided by the U.S. Coast Guard, the derelict Japanese fishing vessel RYOU-UN MARU drifts 160 kilometers off Forrester Island in southeast Alaska on Tuesday. The vessel has been adrift since it was swept away by the tsunami that struck Japan last year.

© Japan Today

©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.

39 Comments
Login to comment

That is amazing! I wonder if it has been spotted and reported many times since the Tsunami and has slowly made it's way accross the ocean.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

If no one wants that rust bucket, I'll take it!

0 ( +2 / -2 )

The typical Japanese way of doing things!! I no longs find any use for it so I will abandon it and leave it to ruins.

-16 ( +3 / -19 )

It's larger than I thought and have to think it could be salvaged and at least worth more than scrap. But obviously the sticking point is ownership.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

I would take that boat, call it Jenny and go into the shrimping business

8 ( +9 / -1 )

amazing that it has drifted all that way. I wonder if any other people had spotted it during its voyage. It would certainly be a modern day ghost ship if I ever seen one. haha.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Somehow I would think returning it to Japan would be difficult considering it's association with such a negative event (think of the recent article on JT about apartments where people died)

0 ( +0 / -0 )

makes me think of that rod steward song "sailing"

0 ( +1 / -1 )

I think I have read that the owner no longer wants it. Also, I believe that international law on salvage says something along the lines that anyone can claim it under certain guidelines. Perhaps someone else knows more. It is obviously seaworthy and although in need of a coat of paint must have some commercial value.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

I doubt there is any question of ownership. The question is, when is the owner going to come over and clean up their mess? Why hasn't this been addressed at all? You cant just dis-own the boat then throw it away in the ocean. Not at least while the world watches.

Japan has a responsibility to clean up the mess. It's just a matter of time before the world starts demanding it.

-10 ( +2 / -12 )

"You cant just dis-own the boat then throw it away in the ocean."

Howard: I think you can.

3 ( +3 / -0 )

HowardStern. I sincerely doubt that the world will demand anything of Japan. It was an epic tragedy and one that I am sure people around the world grasp and fully understand.

More likely waste arriving from Japan will be cleared and disposed of locally. Or there may be international collaboration to deal with larger problems.

I hardly think it is fair to portray this boat or any other debris as negligence. It is a rather heartless and narrow view of a very complex issue.

6 ( +8 / -2 )

Canada please return the ship home again

-1 ( +2 / -3 )

Food for thought; it is quite possible that the owner of the ship died on 3.11.

I agree with tkoind, to view this as negligence is just showing ignorance of the situation.

2 ( +5 / -3 )

The owner didn't die. The owner is a corporation that filed papers saying they don't want it anymore. If anybody wants it they just have to get to it, throw a rope around it, and haul to a port of their choosing. Then, fix it up to make it seaworthy according to national laws. (It's obviously seaworthy in real terms as it has bobbed its way across the Pacific).

0 ( +3 / -3 )

There was an article here in Canada on this last week - the owner of the boat has already collected the insurance money on it and has given up his claim on the boat. So I suppose, technically, it is now owned by the insurance company.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

Before you salvage it, think of oils and chemicals on board which you would have to dispose properly you have to spend big $ before you can make money of scrap metal. Nobody want's this, that's why it's still there.

2 ( +3 / -1 )

This poor ship, abandoned, not knowing where to go next. I find this too cruel on her. She obviously is in a poor state, needs desperately anti-fouling. RIP

0 ( +1 / -1 )

I wonder why the USCG doesn't just take the ship under tow? They normally slap huge fines on violators and this is a hazard to navigation in terms of other ships maybe running into it while underway. It is a big ocean, but having spent over 14 years of sea duty, you will be surprised at what can sneak up on you while out at sea in the middle of the night.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

if the waters its in are deep enough its probably best just scuttle it I think the term is, ie sink here & leave her be

Its unlikely these are worth the effort to scrap from a $$ point of view

1 ( +1 / -0 )

They only scuttle when all fuel, oil, grease, etc. has been removed. Who is gonna do that?

0 ( +0 / -0 )

The exxon valdez was recently sold for scrap metal for US$16 million.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Taking ownership of the ship isn`t without potential trouble for any would be salvage company. Firstly, it will only be allowed into a port when the authorities have verified that it poses no threat (threat of fuel oil leaking, threat of sinking and blocking access for port access, etc). In many cases ships like these are unable to be brought to a port for this reason. This makes scrapping of it difficult. Scrapping a ship in a Western country is quite expensive due to the environmental safe guards (many have asbestos on board that needs to be professionally removed, as well as many other toxic products). Therefore most ships are salvaged in India (at great danger to the cheap labourers).

The fuel used by these ships is called L.F.O (Liquid Fuel Oil). It is not like gasoline, it is a very heavy almost mud like subtance that is quite toxic. So if it washes aground and breaks apart there is a very real risk of a small localised environmental impact on the bays or area of Alaska coast that it washes ashore on (New Zealand just had the Rena ship break apart and pollute a large strecth of coast line, but the M.V Rena was a much larger ship).

The real question is how much more stuff, and in what form, is coming across. If there is only this one relatively small fishing boat then it is a non issue. However if we are talking about potentially several boats, and in particular miriads of smaller objects that pose a threat to safe maritime navigation then it becomes an issue as to who pays for it.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Having worked in the military, and somewhat familiar with the USCG, I guarentee you that there have been hundreds of hours of planning sessions on this vessel, and Course of Action (COA) on how to handle this vessel. No doubt, the main thing holding them back are the lawyers. In my opinion, they should just take it under tow, and pull it into a port, inspect and sell for scrap. But to do that, they may face litigation from the owners (if they are still alive) in Japan, and possibly from the JN government if they want to make a claim to it for some reason.

I say just take the ship under tow, and tow it either to Alaska or back to Japan, and stop it from being a hazard to mariners.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

As the owners have reliquished their rights to the ship and do not wish to have it back it officially becomes classified as derelict under maritime law. This at least reduces legal complications.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

I would take that boat, call it Jenny and go into the shrimping business

Make more money transporting boxes of chocolate.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

The vessel could do very well with a spit shine. It's a fixer upper but it's still worth it's weight if it's been afloat unmanned this long.

What a nice opportunity for the U.S. Haul that sucker in, contact it's owners, bring the community out and get to scrubbing together.

I hope they take advantage of it.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

It's a miracle this boat is still floating. I wonder if there are other boats like this?

2 ( +2 / -0 )

Japanese government should tow this back here and launch it catapult-style at N.Korea. Now, that would be something worthwhile.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

The owner of the ship was contacted but he has already relinquished his rights to the ship. I'm with others on this one -- tow it to port, inspect it, then scrap it unless someone wants to buy it to remember what happened last year.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

I'll bet the crew is hungry by now.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

Must have been made in japan as it is still afloat

0 ( +0 / -0 )

I realized that ships, vessels, etc easily get rusty without good care. The owner would want to clean the vessel if he were alive and saw it.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

The insurance company most likely owns the ship now. If someone were to salvage it they would look at tugging it over to Asia where there aren't many pesky environmental laws to contend with.

0 ( +1 / -1 )

The question is, when is the owner going to come over and clean up their mess? Why hasn't this been addressed at all? You cant just dis-own the boat then throw it away in the ocean. Not at least while the world watches

Urm you know the tsunami wasn't just a opportunity for people to of thrown stuff away into the ocean!

0 ( +2 / -2 )

A derelict ship sent drifting off into the ocean after a major natural disaster, discovered a year later? It's a good setting for a ghost story if nothing else...

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

No one wants it? Give it to me. Where can I collect this ship? I'm not joke but I'm very very serious. I'll start business straightaway between US and South America. You know it's good for our fellow Banana farmers from Bolivia and Colombia also peoples from Hollywood will happy too. They like Banana too much.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

The owner didn't die. The owner is a corporation that filed papers saying they don't want it anymore.

It is my understanding that the owner had disowned it even before the disaster.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

It's to be scuttled by the coast guard.

http://www.seattlepi.com/news/article/US-to-sink-ghost-ship-dislodged-by-Japan-tsunami-3461405.php

-1 ( +0 / -1 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites