China criticizes 2 Japanese assemblymen for landing on disputed island
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
JAPAN NEWS AND DISCUSSION
-
241 civil servants file suit over salary cuts
( 11 )
-
Japan pledges $500 mil for Pacific islands
( 9 )
-
Ishihara disappointed at low home support for Tokyo Olympic bid
( 27 )
-
Gov't boosts amount of reconstruction grants for Tohoku
( 0 )
-
Ozawa willing to meet Noda but says he won't budge on opposition to tax hike
( 20 )
-
1
Lady Gaga's Indonesia concert canceled after threats
-
2
Hosono visits Fukushima No. 4 reactor amid concern over fuel pool
-
3
Oceanographer says beachcombers on West Coast may find bones in tsunami debris
-
4
241 civil servants file suit over salary cuts
-
5
New Jersey town's monument to Korean sex slaves upsetting Japanese officials
-
- Business Teaching Positions - Part-time - Kanto Region
- Interac, Tokyo
- Salary: ¥3,000 ~ ¥5,000 / Hour
-
- National Relief/Substitute Teacher - summer start
- Interac, Tokyo
- Salary: ¥275,000 ~ ¥300,000 / Month
-
- 営業パーソン
- 加治金属工業株式会社, Tochigi
- Salary: ¥240,000 ~ ¥350,000 / Month Negotiable
Order by Time Order by Popularity
19 Comments
Login to comment
0
OssanAmerica
Oh give it up China. They landed on Japanese territory. Spend your time and energy on repairing your image over hte Nobel prize.
0
tian4670
Then you must feel very comfortable when Russian prime minister spent a holiday on 'Northern' islands, now belongs to Russia.
0
amerijap
Did they get permission from the government for their trip?
0
sarahsuz25
This is the most troubling part--what's to stop these landowners from turning around and leasing the islands to China?
0
OssanAmerica
The United States, United Kingdom, the European Parliament considers the four islands Japanese territory under Russian management.
0
YuriOtani
sarahsuz25, well for some reason the central government wants these islands to be empty. The landowners are being forced to lease the land to the government now just like the landowners on Okinawa.
0
tian4670
Not everybody on earth want to call US their big brother. Particularly those with spine.
0
tian4670
OssanAmerica: Those islands are rewards for Russian to start wars against Japan, promised my US. Russian fulfilled its part, so they keep those islands.
0
kwatt
It is very natural that Japanese should land on the islands or walk around there for hours as these belong to Japan's territory. What seems to be wrong? Nothing!
0
Kwaabish
Why doesn't China stop interfering in Japan's "internal affairs"? (Tell me if you've heard that line before...)
0
kyushujoe
Do you really, really believe that its natural to land on a remote island and wander around it for hours? How often do you do it?
0
NuckinFutz
"traces of things associated with Japanese people who once lived there"? So they video'd the trash washed up all over the beaches huh? There's Japanese trash on beaches all over the Pacific, that doesn't prove ownership!
0
bee2005
Bomb the islands into 2 parts and problem's solved.Said easy than done...
0
toguro
Is there anything China doesn't WHINE about?
0
OssanAmerica
No you're very much mistaken. The United States had objected to the Soviets occupying them in 1951 at the time of the Washington Treaty. Recommend you study some history before commenting.
0
iWorld
These two irresponsible assemblymen have started a chain reaction. In the future, when push comes to shove, the japanese will probably go crying to their american masters.
0
PT24881
Naive act
0
MeLikeJapan
What's wrong with landing there? Maybe they went there for a vacation.
0
tian4670
OssanAmerica ： I am very sorry to tell you that the agreement had been signed ~10 years (early 1940s) before US objection in 1951.
Back to top