No No No Hugh....here we don't worry about the conduct of the Japanese. That doesn't count. Only the conduct of the foriegner matters. Its doesn't matter that Japanese Nuclear powerplants have a shabby safety record. It matters only that it could possibly happen on a Nuclear powered carrier. Even thought the US Navy has a spotless record of safety in Nuclear powered ships and subs.
And will someone please report to the JPress that Nuclear Powered carried doesn't mean Nuclear armed.... 2 different things.....
3 Comments
Hughgarse at 05:24 PM JST - 13th May
this is already a done deal folks.. should worry about your own powerplants before a carrier.
VoXman at 01:53 AM JST - 14th May
No No No Hugh....here we don't worry about the conduct of the Japanese. That doesn't count. Only the conduct of the foriegner matters. Its doesn't matter that Japanese Nuclear powerplants have a shabby safety record. It matters only that it could possibly happen on a Nuclear powered carrier. Even thought the US Navy has a spotless record of safety in Nuclear powered ships and subs.
And will someone please report to the JPress that Nuclear Powered carried doesn't mean Nuclear armed.... 2 different things.....
USNinJapan2 at 07:15 AM JST - 14th May
Futility.
Register or login to add a comment!