Sarge: JAL's not too big to fail. Remember Pan Am, Japanese National Railways?
Yes, Pukey: they are in deep debt, how are they able to look so far ahead?
How many people are JAL expecting to fly to the other side of the world, on JAL? Figures please - I'm a taxpayer.
TAM won't even fly the Sao Paulo-Tokyo route. As my own rule of thumb, if JAL is flying to an international destination while the local carrier doesn't, it's a good cause to believe JAL is not making money on that route.
Flying from Tokyo to Rio tires me out just thinking about it. I've aired between the two countries from the U.S. many times and each leg is at least 12 hours or more. But to fly to Brazil from Tokyo, I would need a stop over in NYC for a day or two. No thanks and skip the Olympics.
Flying out of Japan to any destination with JAL is the most expensive way currently. My web research showed me that if I want to go to Rio or Sao Paulo, any US or European carrier is at least 20,000 yen cheaper than JAL. Plus, the luggage limit is tighter with JAL.
› Login to comment
11 Comments
Pukey2 at 08:57 AM JST - 17th October
Will JAL survive until 2016?
I suppose they'll need the flights, seeing that the government is paying the Brazilians to go back home.
Sarge at 09:05 AM JST - 17th October
JAL's too big to fail.
steen at 12:06 PM JST - 17th October
Sarge: JAL's not too big to fail. Remember Pan Am, Japanese National Railways?
Yes, Pukey: they are in deep debt, how are they able to look so far ahead? How many people are JAL expecting to fly to the other side of the world, on JAL? Figures please - I'm a taxpayer.
NeoJamal at 12:43 PM JST - 17th October
TAM won't even fly the Sao Paulo-Tokyo route. As my own rule of thumb, if JAL is flying to an international destination while the local carrier doesn't, it's a good cause to believe JAL is not making money on that route.
gogogo at 01:21 PM JST - 17th October
This article is messed up.
Title:
First line of article:
gogogo at 01:22 PM JST - 17th October
oh wait... I see.... it's scrapping the plan to eliminate, a double negative :)
Kapuna at 01:49 PM JST - 17th October
Or maybe elliminating it's plan to scrap?
rajakumar at 08:36 PM JST - 17th October
GO JAL, GO.
GO BRAZIL,GO BRAZIL 2014world cup, GO BRAZIL 2016 Olympics.
kp123 at 02:42 AM JST - 18th October
Flying from Tokyo to Rio tires me out just thinking about it. I've aired between the two countries from the U.S. many times and each leg is at least 12 hours or more. But to fly to Brazil from Tokyo, I would need a stop over in NYC for a day or two. No thanks and skip the Olympics.
LostinNagoya at 02:50 AM JST - 18th October
Flying out of Japan to any destination with JAL is the most expensive way currently. My web research showed me that if I want to go to Rio or Sao Paulo, any US or European carrier is at least 20,000 yen cheaper than JAL. Plus, the luggage limit is tighter with JAL.
biglittleman at 08:00 AM JST - 18th October
No, just too proud. They are going to pour tons of money into JAL because it will be seen as an embarrassment if they go under.