U.S. tightens entry rules for travelers from Japan, Europe
WASHINGTON —
Travelers from Japan and Western Europe will face tighter restrictions on coming to the United States beginning in January, according to new rules unveiled Tuesday by the U.S. government.
Tourists and business travelers from the 27 countries currently listed under the visa waiver program will have to register with the U.S. government three days in advance, the Department of Homeland Security said.
The new rules aim to make it more difficult for potential terrorists to enter the United States from places such as France, Germany, Switzerland, Britain, Belgium, Portugal, Spain, Singapore, New Zealand, Japan and Australia, the government said.
However, critics have raised concerns about the possibility of reduced tourism and difficulties with last-minute business travel.
“Getting this information in advance enables our frontline personnel to determine whether a visa-free traveler presents a threat, before boarding an aircraft or arriving on our shores,” said Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff.
“It is a relatively simple and effective way to strengthen our security, and that of international travelers, while helping to preserve an important program for key allies.”
The government will ask for the same information that travelers currently fill out on the I-94 card which is handed out on the plane and turned in to customs on arrival in the United States, a DHS official said.
That includes such information as passport number, country of residence, disclosure of communicable diseases or involvement in terror activities.
Travelers may register with the U.S. government beginning in August, and the information will remain valid for a maximum of two years so it is not necessary to repeat the same process in that time period.
Once the regulations become mandatory in January 2009, all U.S.-bound travelers from the countries affected “will need to receive an electronic travel authorization prior to boarding a U.S.-bound airplane or cruise ship,” it said.
Under the new program, known as the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA), travelers may apply for an ESTA authorization on the Internet at a U.S. government website, or through their travel agent.
The European Commission, which negotiates security arrangements on behalf of the 27 EU member countries, has asked the United States to explain the new restrictions, spokesman Michele Cercone said in Brussels.
EU Justice Commissioner Jacques Barrot wants to establish whether the system would amount to a de-facto visa, and asked Chertoff by phone for “more information in detail and for documents so they could be studied by the commission,” Cercone said.
“We have to see what data the Americans are going to ask for, how they plan to manage and use them.”
The website, https://esta.cbp.dhs.gov/, will accept applications beginning August 1 and “will employ technology to prevent unauthorized access to the information entered and viewed.”
“Access to such information is limited to those with a professional need to know,” the DHS said on its website.
If a traveler is denied ESTA authorization, the alternative is to apply for a non-immigrant visa at a U.S. embassy or consulate.
“ESTA will accommodate last minute and emergency travelers,” it said, but added that travelers should seek an ESTA approval as soon as they start planning a U.S. trip, and no later than 72 hours before departure.
ESTA was called for under the “implementing recommendations” of the 9/11 Commission Act in 2007, DHS said. The 9/11 Commission was a bipartisan panel created by the U.S. government to investigate the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States.
The ESTA rules do not affect U.S. travelers heading overseas.
The visa waiver program was created in 1986 “with the objective of eliminating unnecessary barriers to travel, stimulating the tourism industry,” according to the State Department website.
Wire reports



Order by Time Order by Popularity
42 Comments
Login to comment
0
bebert
More bllsht from the paranoid U.S. government. Travel becomes almost unbearable these days.
0
flatwheels
Belgium, Germany...not us dutch?
0
OssanULTRA
True it's an addditional hassle, and effectively eliminates the very benefits that the Visa-Waiver Program was intended to provide to tourists and the tourist industry. But one can not deny that it may be a loophole for entry. We can thank the terrorists for this along with all the other security hassles.
0
OssanULTRA
"More bllsht from the paranoid U.S. government. Travel becomes almost unbearable these days."
why do you consider it BS? And why do you think it is "paranoid"? Did not 911 happen? Did it not expose our lax entry system?
0
Zen_Builder
Doubt that those new rules will do anything to prevent terrorists from getting into the US.
They can always get smuggled in like the thousands of other illegal immigrants(Mexican Border, etc) or simply use people that will not trigger any of those checks. Or forbid hire from within the US borders.
What it will do though, is hurt more business travelers and further reduce the number of tourists. Already many companies no longer send their employess to the states for training or business visits.
0
motobujohn
For: bebert....you once stated. "Before making such callous statement, thing...". I think....you should practice what you preach.
0
treebeard
please bring back profiling... it is much more effective.
0
motobujohn
OssanULTRA...You hit the nail on the head...
0
Farmboy
Well, the rules on travel and tourism have already made the airline industry sick. More rules will kill them, and then the US will be nice and safe, with no way to fly in and out....so then terrorists will have to take boats or go on foot, unless they're homegrown terrorists or they are already there in the US. I wonder if all Americans will enjoy living in an insulated box in the name of safety...?
0
Farmboy
"The government will ask for the same information that travelers currently fill out on the I-94 card ....That includes such information as passport number...or involvement in terror activities."
So terrorists would list their terror activities, and the government would decide whether what they did was important enough? Gee, this sounds like a really effective plan.
0
DoctorTofu
No, actually I believe it didn't expose "your lax entry system". Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the hijackers have LEGAL visas, didn't they use their REAL passports and weren't all their documents in perfect order?
As to why it's paranoid - statistically you have a much bigger chance to be killed by a stray lightning, in a car accident or, if you live in Alaska, by being trampled by an angry moose. The "security" measures proposed by various governments (and by that I also mean the fingerprinting in Japan, by the way) have very little to do with actual security - they're just there to provide the illusion of it. Security theater, that's what it is. Trouble is, that particular play is not really entertaining...
Exit, stage left.
0
taj
Hurrah! Now even more of our global meetings will be held in Europe, Asia, and Canada, even though our company is HQ'd in the US. Must suck for the American Hotels.
0
Altria
What a bunch of blundering idiots.
0
Hughgarse
What a load of bollox. How on earth will this make a difference? Glad I only travel to the US for weddings.
0
cleo
At least not until other countries start playing tit-for-tat.
What a wonderful boost for the American tourist/hotel industry.
0
DoctorTofu
Right? Especially during the recession! I love how American government always thinks outside of the box. See, a regular person, with a brain fossilized by traditional thinking, common sense and reason, would use water to quench a fire. Not American government though! In a novel, bold approach they use gasoline, alcohol and oil to do it - truly a burst of genius and a brave, unorthodox approach!
0
rjd_jr
America must do this, or the terrurusts have won. Or something.
0
Spidey
The government will ask for the same information that travelers currently fill out on the I-94 card which is handed out on the plane and turned in to customs on arrival in the United States, a DHS official said. That includes such information as passport number, country of residence, disclosure of communicable diseases or involvement in terror activities.
Muuuuuaaaahahaha! Huh? Muaahahaha! I definitely saw this on a "Simpsons" episode once.
S
As I wipe the tears from my eyes...
0
Zer00
lol.. this will not keep the terrorists out but make it inconvenient for genuine tourists!!
0
Evildblr
I live in Hawaii and we have already seen a decrease of tourism. This will have a dramatic impact on everyone that lives here. Especially now more Japanese can visit other tropical resorts. With less hassle and where the service is better. As an American I would rather go somewhere else like Bali or thailand where the people are nicer. But still they are people who wants to visit Hawaii and other part of the U.S. if we start implmenting all is so call security regulation we might as well shut down our borders to non white Americans so that only whites can travel this will also alllow the airlines to charge more for baggages.
0
Zen_Builder
I think it will impact a bit more than just tourism.
As a non-US citizen I need to jump through more hoops now than it took me to travel into russia 25yrs ago.
Yet, they want me to buy their products and support them. Hmmm, let me think ...
0
Evildblr
absolutly. Also I would like to add that visa is required for these citizens of the mentioned countries. Now how hard is it to become a citizen of japan?
0
KenjiYamamoto
jesus, have you seen the wiki at phnl? god the kama aina have to suffer hell with such a dilapidated airport...
the security's a hassle sometimes, but after 911 it does make me feel a bit safer. those immigration folks look pretty grumbly at passport control. i was shocked to see heading into honolulu that those guys in the booths looking over passports were armed as well!!! @@ ! --> bang bang!
0
Richard_III
They must be insane.
I really want to travel round the States a lot more, they're making it increasingly difficult to enjoy a trip there. As soon as you get to the airport you're treated with suspicion. I can imagine for muslim travellers that it's twice as bad. This is making an already crappy irritating system worse.
0
rtrhead1
So, for those who are talking about how bad and useless these measures are, what is your solution? Or is it just to badmouth what everyone else does without any solutions of your own? Racial profiling would have worked in the 9/11 situation. I hate to say it, but they all LOOKED like Middle Eastern men. Now I know, some of you may say that it is a horrible breach of civil rights, but, let's call a spade a spade. 9/11 was planned, and executed by Middle Eastern men.
0
Zen_Builder
There is NO solution.
Like all the burglar prevention all they can do is slow a burglar down but the determined ones will get in and/or will find a way around them.
You can control all the entry-ports you want and like I said they can use the mexican border, take a boat over from Cuba, etc.
But trying to pass those measures of as "anti-terrorism" is an insult to our intelligence. Same with the japanese finger-printing.
0
Taka313
Maybe rtrhead1 is right. After all, other than Tim McVeigh, Ted Kazinsky, Terry Nichols and the damn near the entire IRA, all terrorists look middle eastern, right?
Taka
0
super delegate
You forgot Barack Obama's friend and mentor, Bill Ayers.
And on Barack's Big Day.
How could you?
0
Taka313
Forgot your dear leader too, but I was trying to be polite.
0
Taka313
I'll take that as a "no" then.
Taka
0
presto345
The majority of those traveling to the U.S. of A. from the countries mentioned do not undertake this adventure on very short notice, so registering a few days in advance is no big deal.
0
WMD
Who cares? I have absolute zero desire to go paranoia land.
0
Sarge
WMD - We won't miss you.
0
OssanULTRA
"Did not 911 happen? Did it not expose our lax entry system?
"No, actually I believe it didn't expose "your lax entry system". Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the hijackers have LEGAL visas, didn't they use their REAL passports and weren't all their documents in perfect order?"
Exactly. And that was LAX. Today the issuance of Visas and background checks are on a different scale from pre-911. The background verification of Visa-Waiver entrants has been a loophole because there has been insufficient time to complete a check, a situation which will, all going well, be corrected by having a minimum of 72 hours to complete.
"As to why it's paranoid - statistically you have a much bigger chance to be killed by a stray lightning, in a car accident or, if you live in Alaska, by being trampled by an angry moose. The "security" measures proposed by various governments (and by that I also mean the fingerprinting in Japan, by the way) have very little to do with actual security - they're just there to provide the illusion of it."
So you would advocate doing NOTHING? Those like you who whine incessantly about how "this mesure doesn't do anything" are always the ones who have absolutely nothing to suggest as an alternative action. Am I wrong? And don't give this "statistically" garbabge about getting hit by lightening because I personally was in Manhattan on 9/11/2001 and it was no joke or theater.
0
timeon
I quote from my DS156 form (I had to go to US for a joint research program):
"Do you seek to enter the United States to engage in export control violations, subversive or terrorist activities, or any unlawful purpose? Are you a member or a representative of a terrorist organization as currently designated by the US Secretary of State? Have you ever participated in persecutions directed by the Nazi government of Germany; or have you ever participated in genocide?"
so stay assured, citizens of US, we the terrorists and genocide masterminds are shaking with fear at the tight security.
0
Zen_Builder
If the US wants to tighten border controls to prevent foreigners from coming in, so be it just don't use 911 to justify it. 911 is NOT the magic pill to sort all your problems.
Yep, 911 happened the rest of the world has terrorist attacks nearly daily and has done so for a few decades. I remember the PLO, etc blowing stuff up in my home-town, etc.
Ok, lets tighten the entry restrictions from europe, japan, etc "7 yrs" after 911, this means in the 7yrs the terrorists could have put an army in place in the US via that route. Huh? Also the 15 that did 911 I can assure you had help from people already in the US.
So it don't make sense to use 911 to justify things. Maybe the US realized we didn't do enough earlier on and is now scrambling to cover their behinds.
But as I and other(some Americans) said it will most likely hurt you guys more than it will do to prevent terrorists from getting in. Some of my US-friends are so fed up now that even they don't want to go back home.
Fewer tourists, students and business-travelers will come to the US, fewer non-US citizens will feel good about the US and be wiling to buy their products, etc.
Ask, yourself. Can the US afford it? With the current recession, etc.
Just my view.
0
DoctorTofu
Yes, that's precisely what I would advocate - doing NOTHING more than standard measures. Look at what you're writing - just because you were there and have a STRONGLY EMOTIONAL attitude towards it all means that STRONGLY LOGICAL statistics is garbage? Isn't that precisely what the government (or governments, rather - as I said the situation is not uniquely American) want? Screw logic, screw reason, BE AFRAID!
I repeat - I do not propose alternative action, because I believe NO alternative action is needed. None, zilch, nada. An isolated (tragic, I agree, but still isolated) incident DOES NOT justify the measures taken. If people overwhelmed by emotions had (even more) power, they would probably want to tighten control on shaving machines (razors! danger! suicide prevention!), kitchen knives (stabbings!), forks (likewise! painful stabbings!), chopsticks (I'm sure they were used to attack someone once or twice in the history of humankind!), plastic bags (you can suffocate someone with it!), shoes (shoe bomber! oh my god, the shoe bomber!), stockings (bank robbers use them a lot!), cars (used in getaways!) and so on and so forth...
So, while I understand you're emotional, please don't let emotions cloud your judgment...
0
Zen_Builder
I am with DoctorTofu.
Reminds me of when I traveled to Thailand with my Wife after 911.
Only flights bound to the US from Bangkok had way heavy security measures and most people said "thanks god" we are NOT on those flights.
Point of terrorism is that it can happen anytime, anywhere and from any quarter. That is the frightening thing but right now I think the terrorists have won in the US as everybody is paranoid, etc and that is the goal of terrorism.
It is NOT about the body-count but about the reaction you can get from your attack. And, IMHO, the US goverment has used 911 to push through measures, Iraq, etc they wanted to do but couldn't have done without 911.
Just my view.
0
WhiteHawk
Oh great, tighten the restrictions on Japanese executives and tourists, but leave the southern border wide open, eh? We need more drunken gardeners and MS-13 gang members killing people (after all, they're only doing the jobs Americans just won't do), but keep an eye on that Nissan executive!
And some Americans want the same bureaucratic group-think running the nation's healthcare system. Maybe even the petroleum industry too!
0
WhiteHawk
RichardIII:
Actually, they tend to get treated with kid gloves (if not ignored altogether) because security personnel are afraid to be disciplined or sued for "racial" profiling.
0
rtrhead1
No, taka, they don't all look middle eastern. But then again, when is the last time the IRA has ever struck at either America, or it's interests, or it's people? Secondly, Tim Mcveigh, Terry Nichols, Ted Kazinsky don't look middle eastern. But, the bulk of the ones in this world that we live in who are screaming for American blood, who have said that they wish to kill us where ever we may be, and who have told us specifically they will come and try to attack us in the US, ARE MIDDLE EASTERN!!! And as far as my "dear leader", he's a moron and a liar. Horrible combo. Thank God he's out this year. At least we can agree on that.
0
rtrhead1
zen builder, the goal of terrorism is not to get us to tighten our security measures and become paranoid, the goal of terrorism is to further political or idealogical beliefs through the use of violence and terror inducing actions. The tightening of security measures is just another added benefit for them.
Back to top