› Login to comment

11 Comments

• 

  adaydream at 07:33 AM JST - 13th September

  So george bush and the Pentagon are just going to continue firing missiles into Pakistan.

  Just because there is a village, it doesn't mean that there are Taliban there.

  Just because we see people with the use of our drones, it doesn't mean we have to kill them.

  The drones are great. Magnificant pieces of equipment. But when we're killing innocent people, they aren't a substitute for actual common sense.

  How would you expect the United States would react if Canada or Mexico started shooting missiles into the US because they saw suspicious activity. < :-)

• 

  ColAmerica at 07:40 AM JST - 13th September

  adaydream; No body would fire missiles into the US, we are not terrorists.

  if we learn that terrorist activity is occuring in Pakistan, it is our moral duty to attack. Attack is the best form of defence, don't you know.

• 

  ColAmerica at 07:56 AM JST - 13th September

  adaydream; How do you know any of the bad guys were innocent?

  Innocent people would not be in the vicinity of these terrorists.

• 

  adaydream at 08:19 AM JST - 13th September

  "Even when you kill innocent people?

  You go there ColAmerica. < :-)"

  How do you know they were terrorist? Do terrorist dress different that civilians? Do terrorist have certain marks on top of their homes? Do terrorist look different?

  How do you know any of them were terrorist? < :-)

• 

  ColAmerica at 08:27 AM JST - 13th September

  adaydream; we have advanced intelligence sources, anyone who knows about the military will tell you that.

  Innocents do not walk around with machine guns and rPG`s, the sort of things detected by own drone technology.

• 

  adaydream at 08:50 AM JST - 13th September

  Where did the article say that these people were walking around with weapons at all? Did I miss that part? JT sent you special reports?

  Again, no weapons were aluded to in the article and unless you can find one, there weren't weapons. We have a history of killing civilians in Pakistan and Afghanistan. < :-)

• 

  ColAmerica at 08:55 AM JST - 13th September

  adaydream; "We have a history of killing civilians in Pakistan and Afghanistan", maybe you have a history of doing that, but our military has clean hands.

  12 terrorists kieed, good riddance to bad rubbish!!

• 

  SezWho2 at 10:34 AM JST - 13th September

  ColAmerica,

  Are "advanced intelligence sources" intelligence sources of a higher caliber or are they only unintelligent sources which are nearer the action?

• 

  ColAmerica at 11:03 AM JST - 13th September

  SezWho2- They are both. We also have paid informers mingling with the bad guys and also special forces guiding us to our targets.

  The chances of innocents being harmed from our missile attacks are almost nil.

  The 12 killed , i am sure, will be shown to be terrorists and their allies.

• 

  WilliB at 01:26 PM JST - 13th September

  Who gets to decide who is "innocent" here? By which definition? According to fundamentalist islam, none us here is innocent, because all of us kuffars are guilty for not believing in the Arabic god and his prophet.

• 

  SezWho2 at 07:51 PM JST - 13th September

  ColAmerica,

  The chances of innocents conducting missile attacks are nil. The chances of innocents being harmed from missile attacks are astronomical by comparison and, colloquially speaking, are pretty good.

Register or Login to leave a comment