Monday May 28, 2012

Artificially cooling Earth may prove perilous

WASHINGTON —

Radical proposals to inject sulfur particles into the Earth’s stratosphere to cool it down and battle global warming could instead badly damage the ozone layer, a study warned Thursday.

“Our research indicates that trying to artificially cool off the planet could have perilous side effects,” said researcher Simone Tilmes from the National Center for Atmospheric Research.

“While climate change is a major threat, more research is required before society attempts global geo-engineering solutions.”

The study, published Thursday in Science Express, warns that injecting sulfate particles into the air at an altitude of some 10 to 50 kilometers, could lead to a loss of ozone above the Arctic and delay the recovery of the hole in the ozone layer above Antarctica by decades.

In the past few years, scientists have been studying “geo-engineering” ways to combat global warming rather than by just reducing emissions of greenhouse gases alone.

One of the ideas put forward and studied by Nobel Chemistry laureate Paul Crutzen draws on the lessons learned from volcanic explosions, when vast amounts of sulfur particles are unleashed into the air.

The sulfur, which blocks the sun’s rays, has in the past led to a cooling of surface temperatures around the volcano site.

Researchers, led by Tilmes, studied what would happen if regular, large amounts of sulfate particles were artificially injected into the atmosphere with the aim of cooling the surface temperatures.

But in fact the team found that over the next few decades, such large amounts of sulfates would likely destroy between about 25 to 75% of the ozone layer above the Arctic.

This could have a devastating effect on the northern hemisphere, computer simulations showed. The expected recovery of the hole over the Antarctic would also be delayed by 30 to 70 years.

Researchers found that such large amounts of sulfates would enable chlorine gases found in the cold layers of the stratosphere above the two Poles to become active, triggering a chemical reaction harmful to ozone.

Ozone is an unusual molecule. Ground-level ozone produced by pollution, mostly from cars, is harmful to the health. But in the stratosphere, where is it produced naturally, it screens out the sun’s dangerous ultra-violet rays, which can cause such things as skin cancer.

“This study highlights another connection between global warming and ozone depletion,” said co-author Ross Salawitch of the University of Maryland.

“These traditionally had been thought of as separate problems but are now increasingly recognized to be coupled in subtle, yet profoundly important, manners.”

The damaging effects of such sulfate treatments would be lessened in the second half of the century, when international accords on banning the production of ozone-depleting chemicals are due to be fully felt, the study added.

AFP

  • 0

    jambon

    “While climate change is a major threat, more research is required before society attempts global geo-engineering solutions.”

    Notice that they have traded "global warming" for the catch all "climate change".

    Climate change has been a "major threat" since before the presence of man. Get over it.

    Oh, how The (secular) Left want their Eden so badly.

  • 0

    weedkila

    They are already doing something like this with aerosol spraying, or 'chemtrails' as they generally called. (Try googling it.) I live in a large city in Japan and see these things regularly. The difference between chemtrails and regular contrails is that these trails stay in the atmosphere w/out really evaporating. On days when they spray the planes run east to west in parallel lines. The trails they leave eventually merge. I don't what it's about but we may later hear that they are sulphur particles and are being sown for the reasons outlined in the JT story ... lol.

    Btw, this article by Australia's first astronaut probably gives a better indication of the coming "climate changes."

    Sorry to ruin the fun, but an ice age cometh

    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,23583376-7583,00.html

  • 0

    weedkila

    Here's another hair brained idea scientists were concocting for the threat of global COOLING back in the '70s. Source; Newsweek April 28, 1975 (Clipping near bottom of page)

    http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/globalwarming.html

    Quote: (Climatologists) concede that some of the more spectacular solutions proposed, such as melting the arctic ice cap by covering it with black soot or diverting arctic rivers might create problems far greater than those they solve.

    If you read the N.Week article try substituting 'warming' for cooling', or change the picture's cooler blues for reds and yellows and you basically get the same hype as what is being seen in the MSM these days.

  • 0

    frontandcentre

    Oh, how The (secular) Left want their Eden so badly.

    jambon - not sure why you think that anyone, regardless of their politics, should WANT global warming. It should surely be a matter which transcends politics. The reverse question would be why do some members the (religious) Right want to ignore an overwhelming scientific consensus? Oh yes, these are the same people who think an old guy sitting on a cloud created the whole universe in a week.

    Very credible

  • 0

    frontandcentre

    Sorry to ruin the fun, but an ice age cometh

    Sorry to ruin your fun, but I never heard of an ice age being heralded by de-glaciation and the rapid disappearance of sea ice in the Arctic. Both are undeniable facts, recorded over decades of study, and both processes are accelerating. As Phil Chapman himself accepts in that article, it may be thousands of years before the next ice age commences. In the meantime - it looks like we are more likely to fry

  • 0

    Sarge

    "Artificially cooling Earth may prove perilous"

    Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha! More like, artificially cooling Earth would prove to be impossible. Mother Nature rules. And always will.

  • 0

    jambon

    never heard of an ice age being heralded by de-glaciation

    The polar cap is growing. We've been in a cooling cycle since 1995.

    I wonder if Greenland will ever be green again.

  • 0

    weedkila

    In the meantime - it looks like we are more likely to fry

    frontandcentre: It depends on where you get your information from. Although what you read may be true it might be only part of the picture, in other words, disinformation. Although the earth was going through a warming period up until 1998 (before temperatures apparently levelled off) the opposite now seems to be happening. I've mentioned it before but, as I read time and again, CO2 plays only a very minor role in the overall affect of climate temperature. In fact CO2 follows global temperatures and not the other way around.

    Here is one article that supports what I'm saying about global cooling...

    Over the past year, anecdotal evidence for a cooling planet has exploded. China has its coldest winter in 100 years. Baghdad sees its first snow in all recorded history. North America has the most snowcover in 50 years, with places like Wisconsin the highest since record-keeping began. Record levels of Antarctic sea ice, record cold in Minnesota, Texas, Florida, Mexico, Australia, Iran, Greece, South Africa, Greenland, Argentina, Chile -- the list goes on and on. No more than anecdotal evidence, to be sure. But now, that evidence has been supplanted by hard scientific fact. All four major global temperature tracking outlets (Hadley, NASA's GISS, UAH, RSS) have released updated data. All show that over the past year, global temperatures have dropped precipitously.

    http://www.dailytech.com/Temperature+Monitors+Report+Worldwide+Global+Cooling/article10866.htm

    Also recommended is this recent view from a Brisbane Uni professor talking about "climate change" on a NZ TV show

    Climate Change - has it been cancelled?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgaeyMa3jyU

  • 0

    jambon

    Artificially cooling Earth may prove perilous

    And using food for fuel is equally asinine; another product of the "global warming" hoax.

  • 0

    weedkila

    jambon: good point about the use of food for fuel. The evil twins of global warming and global food shortages (brought to us by the same people.)

  • 0

    GeorgeRouault

    This is alreay been practiced in various countries and places. You can see Chemtrails quite often. Due to this still being under experiment the governments will not tell us what kind of side effects all the chemicals which are been sprayed onto us, farms, fields, forrests have.

    The UK government has already admited trying out a couple of experiments on its people without telling them in the past.

    The Ministry of Defence turned large parts of the country into a giant laboratory to conduct a series of secret germ warfare tests on the public.

    A government report just released provides for the first time a comprehensive official history of Britain's biological weapons trials between 1940 and 1979.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4398507,00.html

  • 0

    jambon

    The UK government has already admited

    I've yet to see a conspiracy theory pan out. This "global warming" hoax may be the first.

Login to leave a comment

OR

Follow us

More in World

View all

View all