Monday May 28, 2012

Australian police clear artist of pornography

SYDNEY —

An Australian artist whose photographs of a naked adolescent boy and girl sparked accusations of child pornography and led to the seizure of his work will not be charged, police said Friday.

Prosecutors had advised that there was “no reasonable prospect of a successful conviction” over the nudes taken by acclaimed photographer Bill Henson, said Assistant Commissioner Catherine Burn.

Police shut down Henson’s exhibition ahead of its opening last month, seizing some 20 works from the Roslyn Oxley9 Gallery in Sydney’s upmarket Paddington and saying charges would likely be laid.

But Burn said Friday she had been informed by the Director of Public Prosecutions that any case based on the photographs would likely fail.

“Matters involving the law and art are notoriously difficult and that is why police sought this advice,” she said in a statement.

“We looked at the possibility of breaches of the Crimes Act. The advice given to us is that a successful prosecution was unlikely.”

Police investigated the images—one including a portrait of a naked 13-year-old girl in which her breasts were visible—following complaints from the public.

The dramatic closure of the exhibition shortly before it was to open on May 22 triggered fierce debate in the country, with Prime Minister Kevin Rudd declaring the works “absolutely revolting”.

As child protection activists called for Henson to be charged over the images, artists such as Hollywood star Cate Blanchett rallied behind him, saying stifling art would damage Australia’s international reputation.

Henson, who had not commented since the exhibition was shut down, welcomed the news that there would be no prosecution.

“It is reassuring to see existing laws, having been rigorously tested, still provide a framework in which debate and expression of ideas can occur,” he said.

Gallery director Roslyn Oxley said she had received support from not only the arts community, but ordinary Australians concerned about free expression.

“These messages give us faith that our society really is as we believe it to be—one that is open to frank debate and inquiry and not afraid to voice differing views,” she said.

The police decision not to press charges came as the Australian censor found that the image of the naked girl was mild and “not sexualised to any degree.”

The Australian Classification Board said its review found the photograph was “mild and justified.”

AFP

  • 0

    Bovinus

    Art is intended to make people think, which is what happened in Australia, so a success for the artist?

    It's only porn if people view it as porn. Artists aren't responsible for how people view and react to their work.

    Young girls are used as models, cheerleaders etc all the time. This is because they are expected to be viewed sexually. How is this better to photographing young girls? It's not, and that's why the immediate reaction to Henson's was 'porn', not 'art' because we live in a society where teenage girls are sexualised and it's considered normal.

  • 0

    tclh

    It is porn when people view those pictures with sexual intentions. It is art when people can explore through " pure,clean mind" the beauty of human female body when it is just about to develope fully. But as a commonsense in today society, you should keep thousands meters away from nude pictures of under age girls(children) if you don't want to be misunderstood(or worse) by many people.

  • 0

    presto345

    Pornography is the representation of the human body with the intent of the artist/photographer to arouse erotic/sexual urges. The artist/photographer can sometimes predict what the effects of their work can lead to, but is not responsible for how their work is (mis)interpreted. Censoring the display of nude images, from adults as well as from children, puts severe restrictions on the freedom of expression which did not even exist in the late middle ages. Sadly for Australia their PM was very much out of line with his personal judgment of a form of art he apparently has absolutely no understanding of.

Login to leave a comment

OR

Follow us

More in World

View all

View all