Bear in mind that when it comes to counterinsurgency warfare;you need a certain amount of troops vis a vis the civilian population.
Apparently the Afghan troops are considered part of the solution when it comes to dealing with the Taliban.
If you're(from a Washington view)counting on the locals to maintain security in order to win and said locals are killing Western troops for the hell of it.
Well you're going to need a lot more then 40,000 extra soldiers at this point.
This is an outrage! British forces should be used only for the defence of the realm, not supporting a greedy and corrupt rat and his so-called government. How many more UK, US etc lives are going to be totally wasted supporting these heathens.
› Login to comment
4 Comments
Delarapier at 01:51 PM JST - 5th November
Bear in mind that when it comes to counterinsurgency warfare;you need a certain amount of troops vis a vis the civilian population.
Apparently the Afghan troops are considered part of the solution when it comes to dealing with the Taliban.
If you're(from a Washington view)counting on the locals to maintain security in order to win and said locals are killing Western troops for the hell of it.
Well you're going to need a lot more then 40,000 extra soldiers at this point.
Kapuna at 02:31 PM JST - 5th November
Has anyone considered the probability that, the training being given to the Afgan forces, is being used against the trainers?
Harry_Gatto at 03:25 PM JST - 5th November
This is an outrage! British forces should be used only for the defence of the realm, not supporting a greedy and corrupt rat and his so-called government. How many more UK, US etc lives are going to be totally wasted supporting these heathens.
Harry_Gatto at 04:12 PM JST - 5th November
This is particulary poignant: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/cartoon/