Monday May 28, 2012

Bush, European leaders warn Iran over nuclear program

BRDO PRI KRANJU, Slovenia —

U.S. President George W Bush and European leaders warned Iran Tuesday of new sanctions if Tehran refuses to halt a nuclear program the West suspects to be a covert atomic weapons drive.

“Iran with a nuclear weapon would be incredibly dangerous for world peace,” Bush said at a joint press conference after his final U.S.-European Union summit. “Now’s the time for all of us to work together to stop them.”

The U.S. president dismissed talk of divisions between hardline Washington and Europe, which plans a new package of diplomatic and economic incentives if Iran will verifiably halt uranium enrichment.

“We’re on the same page,” he declared.

Bush expressed sympathy with Israeli talk of military action against the Islamic republic if diplomacy failed.

“You’d be a little nervous too if a leader in your neighborhood announced that he’d like to destroy you,” he said, a reference to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s repeated predictions that Israel would be wiped off the map.

But Bush omitted past warnings that he has not ruled out using force.

“Now’s the time for there to be strong diplomacy,” he said, as the EU foreign policy chief, Javier Solana, prepared to travel to Tehran with a new incentives plan.

In an apparent admission that the issue might not be resolved during his presidency, Bush said: “I’ll leave behind a multilateral framework to work this issue.”

But he added: “I’m hopeful we can get it done,” said the U.S. president, who, with just seven months left in his term, played down lasting trans-Atlantic rifts on a range of diplomatic dossiers including climate change.

Bush reiterated his position that any international environmental accord that did not bind major emerging economies such as India and China could not work.

But he surprised his audience when he added: “I think we can actually get an agreement on global climate change during my presidency.”

Bush was speaking on the first full day of a farewell European tour that will take him to Germany, Italy, the Vatican, France and Britain.

His tone was not entirely conciliatory. Bush publicly restated the U.S. position that Turkey ought to become a member of the European Union—a view sharply opposed by Berlin and Paris.

“We strongly believe Turkey ought to be a member of the EU, and we appreciate Turkey’s record of democratic and free market reforms and working to realize its EU aspirations,” Bush said.

On Iran, a joint U.S.-EU statement warned Tehran to freeze uranium enrichment—which can be a key step towards a nuclear weapon—or face “additional measures.” And he pledged trans-Atlantic cooperation to tighten the squeeze on the Islamic republic’s banks.

Tehran rejects Western charges that its nuclear program hides an atomic weapons quest, but is under three rounds of U.N. sanctions for refusing to halt enrichment.

“It’s their choice to make: They can either face isolation or they can have better relations with all of us if they verifiably suspend their enrichment program,” said Bush. “We’ll find new sanctions if need be.”

The half-day summit also took up unrest in Zimbabwe, the future of democracy in Lebanon, the international food crisis, efforts to revive the faltering Middle East peace process, and the change of power in Cuba.

After Slovenian Prime Minister Janez Jansa said no one country had the answer to every issue and that there would not always be U.S.-EU harmony, Bush emphasized: “One country can’t solve all problems, I fully agree with that.”

Many observers agree that relations between the United States and Europe Union have improved since the early days of the Iraq war.

Opinion polls do however show that Europeans look forward to the change of U.S. administration, especially if Democratic candidate Barack Obama takes power.

“Make no mistake about it, there will be differences on how to approach different issues, and that’s okay,” said Bush. “Whoever succeeds me as president will understand the importance of the EU.”

Wire reports

  • 0

    captainjohann

    Sir, When these socalled leaders of west ask Iran to halt Uranium enrichment, they donot explain to thinking people how Iran 1. A NPT signatory is able to make nuclear weapons using CIVILIAN enrichment which is under the IAEA supervision which is Iran specific? 2.Is IAEA safeguards so porus, then how come nearly hundreds of nations having CIVILIAN enrichment programme, allowed to continue uranium enrichment expcept Iran?

  • 0

    adaydream

    Bush expressed sympathy with Israeli talk of military action against the Islamic republic if diplomacy failed.

    B/S george bush wanted to attack Iran but couldn't pull it off. he and a whole lot of people are just drooling at the mouth for someone (Isreal) to attack Iran. < :-)

  • 0

    sabiwabi

    I wonder if they'll attack Iran before Bush is impeached. Kucinich summarizes well the crimes committed by Bush and friends leading up to the attacks of Iraq and now with Iran. http://rawstory.com/news/2008/KucinichpresentsBushimpeachmentarticles_0609.html

  • 0

    SushiSake3

    "But he surprised his audience when he added: “I think we can actually get an agreement on global climate change during my presidency.”

    Meanwhile, bush's party does everything it possibly can to ensure America remains addicted to oil, continues paying massive farming subsidies, and treats renewable energy like a rough-edged rugby player might treat an invite to a children's tea party.

  • 0

    SuperLib

    B/S george bush wanted to attack Iran but couldn't pull it off.

    I was waiting for this to come into play. A while ago you were telling us that a US attack on Iran was imminent. I challenged your statement at the time, saying it was nothing more than fear-mongering.

    Fast forward to the present, and your prediction of a US invasion of Iran turned out to be sheer folly. What's your spin now? He "wanted to" but couldn't "pull it off."

    I supposed it's better than just saying you were flat out wrong...

  • 0

    SushiSake3

    Superlib, in case you missed it, there was a near mutiny in the top military ranks last year against Bush/Cheney's plans to attack Iran.

  • 0

    Sarge

    Sushi - Yeah, too bad Bush/Cheney didn't order the invasion of Iran - the top military leaders would have mutinied and made those two fools walk the plank!

  • 0

    adaydream

    Thanx SushiSake3.

    This administration tried very hard to get onto Iran. Did you not see this administration looking for a way to attack Iran? Are you telling me that you didn't see it?

    george bush is very sorry that he didn't get to start another war. As our "WAR PRESIDENT" he failed to get into Iran.

    SuperLib, have you heard Isreal's stance now? They are doing the talking story now and threatening all out war with Iran.

    But I guess Adm. Fallon's resignation didn't show the turmoil caused by the planned attack by this administration. He stepped down because he refused to support george bush's plans for Iran.

    SuperLib, you're absolutely correct. I did claim that the administration planned to attack Iran. george bush just couldn't pull it off. < :-)

  • 0

    sabiwabi

    Sushi - Yeah, too bad Bush/Cheney didn't order the invasion of Iran - the top military leaders would have mutinied and made those two fools walk the plank!

    Those military leaders who opposed Bush/Cheney have gradually been eliminated. I wonder how Gen. Norton Schwartz, the newly recommended leader of the USAF, will be like.

Login to leave a comment

OR

Follow us

More in World

View all

View all