Monday May 28, 2012

Car bombs kill 19 in Baghdad

BAGHDAD —

Two car bombs rocked Baghdad on Wednesday, killing 19 people, while U.S. troops suffered their biggest single loss in a month, bringing to an end a relative lull in violence, officials said.

In the first blast, a powerful truck bomb targeted the home of a senior police officer coordinating security operations with the military in the capital of six million people, police said.

Fifteen people were killed, including the officer’s nephew. At least 65 more were wounded, with three of them being relatives of the intended target in the Al-Shab neighborhood. The victims were rushed to two hospitals. Unconfirmed reports said up to 18 people had died.

Police said the officer, whose name was not given, was not at home when the bomber struck.

Separately, a car bomb exploded outside a family restaurant serving fast food and ice cream in the Jadiya neighborhood, killing four people and wounding 10, police said.

The attacks came as another bombing of police in Salaheddin province, north of Baghdad, killed four policemen, including an officer.

Earlier in the day, three American soldiers were killed by small arms fire in the mainly Sunni Arab town of Hawijah, near the northern Iraqi oil city of Kirkuk, the U.S. military said.

The U.S. deaths on Wednesday raised to 4,090 the number of American troops killed in Iraq since the 2003 invasion, according to a tally based on the independent website www.icasualties.org.

Wednesday’s attack produced the highest single loss for American troops since four marines died in a mine attack in the former Sunni rebel bastion of Anbar province on May 4.

Overall, U.S. troops last month saw their lowest level of losses since the invasion of Iraq in March 2003. The number killed in May dropped to 19, with the previous low being in February 2004, when 20 died.

Iraqi security authorities also reported a 50 percent decline in the number of Iraqi nationals killed last month to 563 from April. The number of Iraqis wounded last month was also down to 1,003 from 2,008 in April.

U.S. military authorities had said that the decline in violence was due to stepped up operations against militia and insurgents, but that al-Qaida in Iraq operatives still had the ability to stage spectacular strikes.

Meanwhile, the U.S. military said its troops together with local police found a water-filled mass grave in an eastern neighborhood of Baghdad on Tuesday. Local officials said there were 55 bodies at the site.

“Based on the varying states of decay, it appears that the remains are approximately two years old,” a statement said. “Iraqi police officials are investigating the incident.

“Our hearts go out to the families and friends of the Iraqi citizens found in this despicable grave,” a spokeswoman said.

“Criminals and extremists continue to show no regard for the sanctity of human life or capacity for a peaceful resolution to their problems.”

Local police officer Lieutenant Hazem al-Rubaye said they found 55 bodies in the mass grave and eight of them were of women.

In the central holy city of Karbala, police reported the arrest of five men wanted in connection with the murders of 721 people over an 18-month period.

Major General Raed Shaker Jawdat, head of police there, said the men were questioned about sectarian murders and they claimed the victims were loyalists of the Baath party of executed dictator Saddam Hussein.

“When we searched the background (of the victims), we found that only 11 of the 721 were in fact Baathists,” Jawdat said.

He said the five men in custody were suspected of leading a criminal gang of some 150 people.

 

Wire reports

  • 0

    japanyesterday

    good news today, bad new tomorrow. no idea where this war is going.

  • 0

    some14some

    War is going nowhere, circling within Iraq only :(

  • 0

    WilliB

    " good news today, bad new tomorrow. no idea where this war is going. "

    The Jihad goes on forever, until all the earth is united under Shariah.

  • 0

    SushiSake3

    It's costing America $12-15 billion a month.

    Couldn't they spend that money on..you know..Americans?

    You'd almost think an American Government would do that.

    But not this one.

  • 0

    SolidBilly

    I am overwhelmed by the irony of this statement,

    “Criminals and extremists continue to show no regard for the sanctity of human life or capacity for a peaceful resolution to their problems.”

  • 0

    Madverts

    This can't be right - I heard mutterings about "Violence had dropped dramatically. We are being vindicated" only yesetrday on the boards.

  • 0

    Madverts

    Maybe I imagined those ridiculous claims afterall.

    Afterall, who could be deluded enough to think he was being "vindicated" in this mess?

  • 0

    medievaltimes

    This headline doesnt matter. It doesnt mean anything in the big picture of things (although if the US was targeting civilians on purpose you guys/gals would be in an uproar)

    No dis...but you posters have it all wrong.

    If you hate Bush, its ok. If you are upset about the way the war was started, its ok. If you dont like America, its ok. If you are upset about no WMD, its ok. If you....If you....If you..........etc

    Micro managing of the war is lame. It doesnt matter what happens day to day or week to week.

    The real issues are 1 - the election 2 - when/how to pull the troops out AND MOST IMPORTANTLY 3 - what happens after the troops are pulled out.

    Most people want to talk about the first two but not the third.

  • 0

    adaydream

    BRING THE TROOPS HOME!!!!!

    They got their Iraqi Army and Police that has been financed by the US because they won't sell and oil. Because they refuse to decide the split of Iraqi oil. < :-)

  • 0

    medievaltimes

    For anybody that wants to post "bring the troops home" etc. Please go into a little more detail of HOW to bring them home. And then explain what happens to Iraq after they are home.

    Interesting article

    http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/06/04/beck.iraq/index.html

    Read and discuss

  • 0

    SolidBilly

    For anybody that wants to post "bring the troops home" etc. Please go into a little more detail of HOW to bring them home. And then explain what happens to Iraq after they are home. Interesting article http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/06/04/beck.iraq/index.html Read and discuss

    How about reading this - http://www.chomsky.info/interviews/20080226.htm

    Or, if you want to skip to the parts most relevant to this discussion -

    "And there is good news. The US occupying army in Iraq -- euphemistically it's called the Multi-National ForceÐIraq, because they have, I think, three polls there somewhere -- that the occupying army carries out extensive studies of popular attitudes. It's an important part of counterinsurgency or any form of domination. You want to know what your subjects are thinking. And it released a report last December. It was a study of focus groups, and it was uncharacteristically upbeat. The report concluded -- I'll quote it -- that the survey of focus groups "provides very strong evidence" that national reconciliation is possible and anticipated, contrary to what's being claimed. The survey found that a sense of "optimistic possibility permeated all focus groupsÉand far more commonalities than differences are found among these seemingly diverse groups of Iraqis" from all over the country and all walks of life. This discovery of "shared beliefs" among Iraqis throughout the country is "good news, according to a military analysis of the results," Karen de Young reported in the Washington Post a couple of weeks ago.

    Well, the "shared beliefs" are identified in the report. I'll quote de Young: "Iraqis of all sectarian and ethnic groups believe that the US military invasion is the primary root of the violent differences among them, and see the departure of [what they call] 'occupying forces' as the key to national reconciliation." So those are the "shared beliefs." According to the Iraqis then, there's hope of national reconciliation if the invaders, who are responsible for the internal violence and the other atrocities, if they withdraw and leave Iraq to Iraqis. That's pretty much the same as what's been found in earlier polls, so it's not all that surprising. Well, that's the good news: "shared beliefs.""

    AND

    "A few days ago, the New York Times -- the military and Iraq expert of the New York Times, Michael Gordon, wrote a comprehensive review, first-page comprehensive review, of the options for Iraq that are being faced by the candidates. And he went through them in detail, described the pluses and minuses and so on, interviewing political leaders, the candidates, experts, etc. There was one voice missing: Iraqis. Their preference is not rejected; rather, it's not mentioned. And it seems that there was no notice of that fact, which makes sense, because it's typical. It makes sense on the tacit assumption that underlies almost all discourse on international affairs. The tacit assumption, without which none of it makes any sense, is that we own the world. So, what does it matter what others think? They're "unpeople," nice term invented by British diplomatic historian [Mark] Curtis, based on a series of outstanding volumes on Britain's crimes of empire -- outstanding work, therefore deeply hidden. So there are the "unpeople" out there, and then there are the owners -- that's us -- and we don't have to listen to the "unpeople.""

Login to leave a comment

OR

Follow us

More in World

View all

View all