The US could give the PRC wireless transmitters to circumvent human rights violations as practiced in the US. Dissent in the US is handled now covertly, and the technology should be more widely distributed or cease to be used. Logic follows that the US cannot and did not go through the Cold War w/out dealing w/ internal dissent. Amnesty International needs to get into the 21st Century and research the usage of wireless transmitters in the US as a new form of human rights violations. Both do it, but the methods are different.
The PRC should begin to use covert methods to handle dissent like the US.
Activists are true democrats, in light of the fact they uphold the rights of business practise without a (government?) license. Yet the US human rights report supposedly, appeals to the stats that show a lack of, human rights, on the part of China, because they refrain (such) activists. Im confused.
It's been a while. If it's any other country critisizing China, then it's China's "internal affiars". But, China can "blast" or "state its displeasure" of actions of other countries in any way it feels....
China likes playing the "leave me alone, I'm a victim of your criticism" card...
Even though we don't like it we have a point. I don't know of China stating it's displeasure with other countries except for when it complains of what a Japanese politician visits.
If the PRC is soooo inclined to emulate US censorship methods, the bright side is that it is well suited for females to listen to wiretaps - from my exposure, 60-70% are females and they dislike pornography when eavesdropping. Females in the PRC can be gainfully employed under the wireless transmitter method. I have enough background from the Cold War to initiate a rudimentary US style censorship apparatus.
› Login to comment
11 Comments
Sarge at 04:32 PM JST - 26th February
I thought the U.S. State Department was under new management, and doesn't interfere in other countries' internal affairs anymore...
MANDUDE at 04:36 PM JST - 26th February
China: "Stop saying bad things about me or I will imprison you and execute you while placing your friends and family under watchful eye"
thedeath at 04:59 PM JST - 26th February
GITMO bay anyone?!
SuperLib at 06:13 PM JST - 26th February
The Chinese deserve criticism for their human rights record.
apecNetworks at 06:21 PM JST - 26th February
Geneva Conventions?
The US could give the PRC wireless transmitters to circumvent human rights violations as practiced in the US. Dissent in the US is handled now covertly, and the technology should be more widely distributed or cease to be used. Logic follows that the US cannot and did not go through the Cold War w/out dealing w/ internal dissent. Amnesty International needs to get into the 21st Century and research the usage of wireless transmitters in the US as a new form of human rights violations. Both do it, but the methods are different.
The PRC should begin to use covert methods to handle dissent like the US.
apecNetworks at 06:34 PM JST - 26th February
BTW, a country needs total control of all telecommunications, but the average person should not know it. This is the foundation for control.
illsayit at 09:08 PM JST - 26th February
Activists are true democrats, in light of the fact they uphold the rights of business practise without a (government?) license. Yet the US human rights report supposedly, appeals to the stats that show a lack of, human rights, on the part of China, because they refrain (such) activists. Im confused.
Kwaabish at 11:15 PM JST - 26th February
Ahhh, back with the "internal affairs".
It's been a while. If it's any other country critisizing China, then it's China's "internal affiars". But, China can "blast" or "state its displeasure" of actions of other countries in any way it feels....
China likes playing the "leave me alone, I'm a victim of your criticism" card...
bushlover at 02:33 AM JST - 27th February
Even though we don't like it we have a point. I don't know of China stating it's displeasure with other countries except for when it complains of what a Japanese politician visits.
OssanAmerica at 05:15 AM JST - 27th February
Ha. What a joke. Next they'll be going back 30 years and calling us Imperialist Pigs.
apecNetworks at 07:05 PM JST - 27th February
If the PRC is soooo inclined to emulate US censorship methods, the bright side is that it is well suited for females to listen to wiretaps - from my exposure, 60-70% are females and they dislike pornography when eavesdropping. Females in the PRC can be gainfully employed under the wireless transmitter method. I have enough background from the Cold War to initiate a rudimentary US style censorship apparatus.