Take our user survey and make your voice heard.
world

Clinton seeks to close book on Benghazi

67 Comments
By BRADLEY KLAPPER and MATTHEW DALY

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

© Copyright 2015 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

©2024 GPlusMedia Inc.

67 Comments
Login to comment

After 7 previous hearing from a Republican controlled committees that found nothing, we all know what this is bout.

And it ain't Benghazi.

Republicans: no honor. no shame.

4 ( +11 / -7 )

But, but in Hillary's own words to HER family, we now know that she said it was indeed an attack. Sorry, but if anyone has NO shame, it's Hillary and oh, she IS under oath, so I look forward to her putting all four of her limbs in her mouth and she's doing a great job at it and the FBI are definitely taking notes.

-10 ( +5 / -15 )

The GOP blew the Benghazi committee, and conservatives know it.

Ever since the McCarthy let slip what everyone already knew, everything has worked out for Hillary (debate, Biden, & now this hearing). She even seems more likable now.

6 ( +10 / -4 )

What you choose to neglect Black Sabath is the emails servers were unknown in previous hearings.....who is shamed now? Hillary lied, Hillary promoted the video claim while a man was placed under arrest when the whole administration knew that was not true! And you talk of shame on the GOP! Seems you miss the truth.....then again if you believe Hillary I guess the truth you believe is wrong.

-7 ( +4 / -11 )

She looks presidential. Thanks for reminding us GOP. I'm amazed with Hillary's memory. I consider myself reasonably intelligent but my god she's smart and she has decades of street smarts. Now you understand why Clinton demanded an open hearing and republicans wanted closed doors and selective leaks. Republicans have been played as incompetent fools.

8 ( +11 / -3 )

Do you think for one moment she was not coached to appear 'composed'? She is a liar. When she blurted "WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE" showed her true colors. She through her lack of concern for the Libyan embassy safety and ignorance of the truth and servers including the promotion of the contrived "result of a video" explanation.

-9 ( +2 / -11 )

Next, Trey Gowdy will be calling the head of the CIA and raking him over the coals too. Right?

5 ( +6 / -1 )

Wingers can spin this all they want, but intelligent Americans have seen this partisan witch hunt for what it is. They also see through the astounding hypocrisy of so-called "Constitutional conservatives," who are willing to shred the document when it serves their purpose, and "budget hawks," who are quite willing to waste millions of taxpayer money. Meanwhile, the GOP ignores issues pressing to America - the debt ceiling, the budget - heck, they'll be lucky just to elect a new Speaker.

Get used to the concept of "Madame President."

4 ( +8 / -4 )

Luguna, Crazy Joe et. al.

You got that right. Talk about backfire.

Even the frothers like Eric Erickson know it:

The Benghazi Hearing Should Not Be, But Is, A Waste of Time - "

5 ( +8 / -3 )

Witch hunt....partially true, she is a witch! Hiding servers with unknown existence of emails! I'll stay informed and intelligent compared to the heads in the sand.

Madame President, Fiorina doesn't seem to maintain the interest so I don't think she will Winn the nomination. Hillary will need to rely on the "Black Lives Matter" crowd and the illegal immigrant votes for her to win.

Why is it the Clintons can do no wrong in some supporters minds? They are full of controversy!

-7 ( +3 / -10 )

"Clinton seeks to Close the Books on Benghazi" The Headline I'd be happy with will come the day after the election when I see the bannar stating "Public Closes the Book on Clinton!"
-5 ( +3 / -8 )

The GOP should be absolutely ashamed with themselves. I have said it before, and I'll say it again, get used to it guys, "Madame President". Today's debacle just made her look presidential. Calm, cool and collected for the most part. Some of the GOP committee members couldn't even look her in the face !

3 ( +6 / -3 )

noting that it is the eighth congressional investigation into the attacks.

US Americans must be happy knowing there are so few problems with their nation that the House can spend time so much time, energy and money on this.

Curious to see how the Faux entertainment fraudcasters will try to spin this. Should be entertaining indeed.

0 ( +3 / -3 )

@MarkG, the thing you are forgetting about witch hunts is: there are no such thing as witches, except in the imagination of uninformed yokels the world over. If you need to compare the former Secretary of State to an imaginary creature, try the Chesire Cat with a wide grin on her face as Trey Gowdy and Elijah Cummins bickered over Sidney Blumenthal. Grasping at thin air is not going to help you catch the chesire cat Clinton.

4 ( +7 / -3 )

Republicans know they are trotting around naked with Banghazi, but they really have no idea what else to do.

5 ( +9 / -4 )

A big question is what Trey Gowdy will do now. That his Committee is a partisan joke is now clear to most outside the bubble. After almost $5 million and a timeframe surpassing the 9/11 investigation, will he quietly let it drop, or will he double down?

Gowdy likely tipped his hand when he said, "If you think you've heard about Sidney Blumenthal so far, just wait for the second round." (Funny how the Dems want the Committee to release the entire Blumenthal transcript, but Gowdy refuses.) So it looks like Gowdy will double down and that the investigation will wander far away from Benghazi and off into winger phantasias of the Clintons.

Really, these guys just can't help themselves.

4 ( +7 / -3 )

The GOP has no honor. They have no honor, and have used the deaths of four Amercans to further their political agnda. They canNOT deny this, and have even patted themselves on the backs about it publicly. It's not abut Americanlives, which mean dirt them -- tens died in embassy attacks under bush, but where are those panels and millions in taxes? Gowdy doesn't even shave anymore, he is so ashamed to wake up in the morning and look in the mirror!

3 ( +7 / -4 )

The GOP blew the Benghazi committee, and conservatives know it.

No, Dems WANT to think that and hope Conservatives fall for that BS, but it's sadly not working, that hole she is digging is so deep, it's almost reaching China.

Ever since the McCarthy let slip what everyone already knew, everything has worked out for Hillary (debate, Biden, & now this hearing).

So you're saying, because he made a mistake, it's just absolute fact, when that myth has already been busted.

She even seems more likable now.

That same was said about Frankenstein's bride.

She looks presidential.

What? If you think so, then Trump really looks equally as presidential.

Thanks for reminding us GOP. I'm amazed with Hillary's memory.

If you sit down with your lawyers and go over again and again all the paper trails, documents, get constant coaching on lengthy basis, you'd have a great memory as well to remember all the details.

I consider myself reasonably intelligent but my god she's smart and she has decades of street smarts. Now you understand why Clinton demanded an open hearing and republicans wanted closed doors and selective leaks. Republicans have been played as incompetent fools.

Actually, it's the other way around, the GOP always wanted an open hearing, but HER lawyers wanted a closed hearing her aides did as well and they got it.

-9 ( +5 / -14 )

Ha ha ha, libs tripping all over themselves congratulating themselves, but Judge Napolitano says:

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/10/15/hillary-clintons-lawbreaking-and-lying-have-caught-up-with-her.html

... (too many reasons to clip to JT, 'Why Hillary is unhappy.') ...

-5 ( +3 / -8 )

bass4funk: "No, Dems WANT to think that and hope Conservatives fall for that BS, but it's sadly not working, that hole she is digging is so deep, it's almost reaching China."

Meanwhile, when asked by reporters after ELEVEN hours of grilling Clinton in clearly partisan politics while using the deaths of Americans, Gowdy admitted they had learned NOTHING new by not being able to answer the question on what they had learned from it. So, this will be the FIFTH time they admit that nothing wrong was done, but because they have ABSOLUTELY nothing else going for them they'll try to bring it up again.

When you point out the fact that the GOP has been on this for more than ANY such investigation in history, wasted more tax money than any such panel, outed CIA informants names while claiming that's what the Democrats had done (when they've had to admit they did not!), and the fact that the would-be speaker and various former committee staff and other key Republicans have admitted it's simply a witch-hunt, the Republicans' answers*

"Yes, it's a witch hunt -- she's a witch!"

"That same was said about Frankenstein's bride"

etc.

Clearly these childish responses, even poorer than the usual "I know you are but what am I" sandbox-retorts, prove that the GOP has absolutely nothing, and it is HILARIOUS to watch them panic and fold. The GOP needs to refund the government on the money it has wasted, and apologize to the families of those killed for shamefully spitting on their graves, as well as the people of the US for yet again making a mockery of the nation.

3 ( +7 / -4 )

The GOP has no honor.

Hey, the last 7 years we've had a Democratic administration that doesn't even know what the meaning of honor is.

They have no honor, and have used the deaths of four Amercans to further their political agnda.

Ironically it's the deaths of those 4 Americans that are an issue at all and keeping the memories alive as to what happened (since the parents can't seem to find the truth out) is all because of the GOP. The Dems, and particularly Hillary have used and lied this agenda to get Obama back into the White House, knowing that had the truth been exposed, Obama would have never made a second term. I do agree, it was a smart move, but on the backs of those 4 Americans...beyond shameful.

They canNOT deny this, and have even patted themselves on the backs about it publicly. It's not abut Americanlives, which mean dirt them -- tens died in embassy attacks under bush,

Funny, EVERY single report has debunked that lousy myth, but if you insist, let's blame Clinton for not getting and killing OBL back in 1998. By the way, the thousands that died was because of Democratic legislation under the Clinton administration that prohibited and block the two agencies from sharing information because of the Dems fear that the FBI would spy on American citizens. So if you really want to know what and who was responsible, it was once again Democratic, fear mongering legislation bureaucratic BS that caused 3000 deaths.

but where are those panels and millions in taxes? Gowdy doesn't even shave anymore, he is so ashamed to wake up in the morning and look in the mirror!

Since when has any liberal or Democrat cared about taxes?????

-7 ( +5 / -12 )

@turbostat

'Andrew P. Napolitano, a former judge of the Superior Court of New Jersey, is the senior judicial analyst at Fox News Channel.'

Dear, oh dear. Talk about asking your barber if you need a haircut....

2 ( +6 / -4 )

Ha ha ha, libs tripping all over themselves congratulating themselves, but Judge Napolitano says: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/10/15/hillary-clintons-lawbreaking-and-lying-have-caught-up-with-her.html

Gosh, you guys are desperate. Why should we care what a shill for Fox News says? Fox News... Please. I took a look anyway, and it was one the saddest most wishful-thinking pieces of garbage I've ever read. She doesn't look unhappy. Even as a Sanders supporter, I admit she looks stronger than ever.

4 ( +7 / -3 )

Gosh, you guys are desperate. Why should we care what a shill for Fox News says? Fox News...

This has nothing to do about FOX other that, they are just not swallowing the liberal Kool aid and following lock and step and in goose step what the Dems want people to believe and I understand, when you start to scrutinize the truth, it makes Dems very uncomfortable.

Please. I took a look anyway, and it was one the saddest most wishful-thinking pieces of garbage I've ever read.

You mean, the part where Hillary told her daughter Chelsea that they were indeed attacked by terrorists and then wanted to walk it back to the media that the reason for the uprising was because of a Coptic Christian making a video critical of Islam, you have to be just an utter idiot to believe that. I give Hillary credit for trying with her smirk self.

She doesn't look unhappy. Even as a Sanders supporter, I admit she looks stronger than ever.

Yeah, except it still does nothing for her being untrustworthy by the majority of the public

-7 ( +4 / -11 )

bass4funk: "Hey, the last 7 years we've had a Democratic administration that doesn't even know what the meaning of honor is."

Like I said, sandbox-retorts.

"Ironically it's the deaths of those 4 Americans that are an issue at all and keeping the memories alive as to what happened (since the parents can't seem to find the truth out) is all because of the GOP."

All because of the GOP spitting on their graves, yes. Don't say the GOP is honoring their memories, please. It's been clearly stated not just by one Republican, not by two, but no less than FIVE who have worked on or with the committee, with one even seeking praise (and getting it) from Hannity on faux news for LITERALLY saying the whole purpose of the panel was to go after Hilary. That's not irony, my friend, nor is it anything you want to be taking credit for.

"et's blame Clinton for not getting and killing OBL back in 1998..."

Bla bla bla... the usual, "The terrorist attacks were Clinton's fault, Obama started the war in Iraq, and bush killed OBL". You guys really have your timeframes screwed up. Even Trump is right about on whose watch 9/11 occurred, as much as his brother tries to deny it.

Jimizo: "Dear, oh dear. Talk about asking your barber if you need a haircut...."

I know! I would have burst out laughing when I saw the source if it were not completely expected! It's hilarious how some GOP so desperately want to believe that faux news is any kind of credible source of information or opinions.

3 ( +7 / -4 )

For those commenting about how composed and polished she appeared, bear in mind that she has been “in front” of these types of committees for 20 years, so it’s rather like lauding an experienced criminal for doing well under police interrogation.

She claimed that “security requests didn’t rise to her level" That’s hard to believe since there were over 600 requests for additional security. That is not a response you'd like to hear from a person campaigning for the presidency. It's a very poor excuse. Is this what you want in a leader - especially a president?

During the 2008 primary campaign Hillary ran TV ads portraying a 3am emergency phone call to the White House depicting an emergency somewhere in the world and it asked the question, “who do you want answering that call, Hillary or Obama?” Frankly, neither one of them.

-7 ( +3 / -10 )

I kind of feel sorry for the people here who don't really have a choice but to continue to pretend this is a credible investigation. It's like they've run out of options and just need to keep talking so they say things they don't personally believe. And they don't realize how much we are baiting them into saying the same stupid things over and over again just to hear them say stupid things and sign their name to it.

Ah, the complexities of being a Republican in 2015. At this point they're probably numb to the dumb things the bubble makes them say.

7 ( +10 / -3 )

I don't like Hillary but she showed the republican committee up for exactly what it was - a political device set up to damage her presidential hopes. It was all too obvious. One of the disturbing aspects for me was how ineptly the republican attack dogs went about it. Hillary's previous "what difference does it make?" response angered me and still does. As I said, I'm not a fan. But this committee was a sham and shame on the republicans.

Btw, the mail to Chelsea blaming it on a terrorist group was not out of line with the information being released to the public. A terrorist group linked to Al Qaeda had claimed responsibility on social media that day but soon after withdrew the claim. The situation in the immediate aftermath of the attack was very confused and fluid with the available "facts" changing rapidly.

0 ( +4 / -4 )

kabukideath

For those commenting about how composed and polished she appeared, bear in mind that she has been “in front” of these types of committees for 20 years, so it’s rather like lauding an experienced criminal for doing well under police interrogation.

Yup, 20 long years of Republican hatchet jobs. 20 years and millions of wasted tax dollars later and what do they have to show for it? Eight investigations for Benghazi alone and what have you proven? The fact that she's still standing is impressive, and that kind of fortitude is not a bad quality for a leader.

Meanwhile you have lot of wasted time and money on your side and not a single policy that has benefited anyone but the richest 1%. Is this what you want in your leaders?

4 ( +6 / -2 )

2 Republicans already admitted it's to affect Hillary's campaign; it's now longer than the Watergate Congress investigation; yet not much going anywhere came out of 11 hours! (That's longer grilling than dissertations!)

It's time for a different tact. Either take her to court, or table it at this time.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

I can't decide which is more entertaining...the Dems and Reps going at it in DC.......or the Dems and Reps on this page.

-7 ( +1 / -8 )

Is this what you want in a leader - especially a president?

Exactly! It's just like the Beirut Barracks Bombings of 1983 that killed not four but 241 U.S. service personnel. That's one reason why Reagan was one of the worst presidents in American history.

Snarkiness aside, Reagan appointed a fact-finding committee that did determine responsibility but focused mainly on countermeasures to prevent future such incidents. Of course, that was a more civilized age. All the GOP can do now is fling poo.

7 ( +9 / -2 )

Benghazi wouldn't have happened in the first place if Obama hadn't attacked Libya without congressional approval. This is just one result of his actions.

Hillary has demonstrated a lack of honesty and integrity in her testimonies and statements on Benghazi as well as her handling of classified emails. These are critical character flaws that no American should be willing to accept in a President.

She has only herself to blame for having to testify. It's a small price to pay for four lives. America deserves the truth.

-7 ( +3 / -10 )

So some want her as president.....

She was not fully cooperative or honest in the investigation....hidden servers, deleted email, telling Chelsea it was terrorism while and you the public it resulted from a video. - proof!

She did not protect her ambassador while he was requesting higher security - the Inteligence reports prove that.

She considers the GOP as an enemy - and she'll divide the nation more than now!!!

To sumise - a dishonest self centered uncooperative with half the nation president. What a choice.....

-8 ( +2 / -10 )

Benghazi wouldn't have happened in the first place if Obama hadn't attacked Libya without congressional approval. This is just one result of his actions.

Face it, the only reason Republicans opposed is because it's Obama. Their hatred for him overcame their usual hawkishness.

Hillary has demonstrated a lack of honesty and integrity in her testimonies and statements on Benghazi as well as her handling of classified emails. These are critical character flaws that no American should be willing to accept in a President.

Specifics? Again, eight investigations later and you still have nothing. How about the dishonesty and lack of integrity of the ones doing the investigating? At least take a honest look at your own side once in a while.

America deserves the truth.

It doesn't seem like you recognize the truth, even when it's right there in front of you.

1 ( +4 / -3 )

'She considers the GOP as an enemy - and she'll divide the nation more than now!!!'

You're right. People should stop the stubborn, childish, partisan mud-slinging and character assassinations which just create division.

Didn't you call her a 'witch' earlier on this thread?

1 ( +4 / -3 )

Like I said, sandbox-retorts.

When Dems hit a wall, that's what they say when the tongue gets tied.

"Ironically it's the deaths of those 4 Americans that are an issue at all and keeping the memories alive as to what happened (since the parents can't seem to find the truth out) is all because of the GOP."

All because of the GOP spitting on their graves, yes.

Funny, that's not what the parents think, in fact, the GOP and FOX have been their only salvation or do you want to talk mess about the families as well?

Don't say the GOP is honoring their memories, please. It's been clearly stated not just by one Republican, not by two, but no less than FIVE who have worked on or with the committee, with one even seeking praise (and getting it) from Hannity on faux news for LITERALLY saying the whole purpose of the panel was to go after Hilary.

Of course, they have, so why then then blank look on Hillary's face when she tried to walk back the very mail she wrote to Hillary, but again, in lib bizarro, are you going to believe me or your lying eyes.

That's not irony, my friend, nor is it anything you want to be taking credit for.

Ahhhh, the jealousy factor kicking in again?

"et's blame Clinton for not getting and killing OBL back in 1998..."

If want to go back 13 years, let's go back to the main root cause.

Bla bla bla... the usual,

Translation, yup, the truth hurts and we don't have ANY excuses for a rebuttal.

"The terrorist attacks were Clinton's fault, Obama started the war in Iraq, and bush killed OBL".

Now you know Exactly what it sounds like when you guys selectively make excuses to fit your narrative.

You guys really have your timeframes screwed up.

Oh, really, but you guys keep blaming Bush after what?.....13 years??? Talk about a timeframe debacle.

Even Trump is right about on whose watch 9/11 occurred, as much as his brother tries to deny it.

Whoever said, Trump is a conservative?! He's no more of a conservative than Chaffey and Webb are Democrats.

I know! I would have burst out laughing when I saw the source if it were not completely expected! It's hilarious how some GOP so desperately want to believe that faux news is any kind of credible source of information or opinions.

Smh. This is why Dems are lousy at governing, they think everything is a joke, it's just pathetic and shows the only thing they're good for is crack jokes and make fun of.

-6 ( +3 / -9 )

bass4funk: "When Dems hit a wall, that's what they say when the tongue gets tied."

And yet again, more sand-box retorts. You guys really are desperate (here, just cut and paste "I know you are, Dems!" to save yourself a bit of time!), but I understand the frustration you must be feeling. You see the unshaven picture of Gowdy in the press? I wouldn't want to look in the mirror either if I were him.

"Translation, yup, the truth hurts and we don't have ANY excuses for a rebuttal."

Haha.. this from a guy who has done NOTHING but cut and paste on the entire issue since the... I forget how many times they've investigated this issue already. How many since the first time, bass? We know it's been longer and more expensive than Watergate.

"Whoever said, Trump is a conservative?! He's no more of a conservative than Chaffey and Webb are Democrats."

What party is he running for, bass? I know that's a tough one...

"in fact, the GOP and FOX have been their only salvation or do you want to talk mess about the families as well?"

If that's their only 'salvation', I feel sorry for them, but yes, the GOP and the committee are literally spitting on the graves of the dead men with this issue -- and you cannot deny it. You know for a FACT they certainly aren't doing it with the purpose of getting to the bottom of the issue, and most certainly not to honor the fallen; it is, as has been admitted by numerous Republicans, a smear campaign against Hilary Clinton. And now Gowdy himself has released the name of a CIA informant when he claimed HILARY was doing that but did not!! You can't make this stuff up!! You guys have been caught in the lie so many times on this one already you really just need to admit it before it gets even more laughable.

The delicious irony is that next year leading up to the elections when Hilary is mentioning the MILLIONS of dollars of tax money Republicans wasted on this and came up with nothing at all new, the spitting on the graves of the dead, and the circus the GOP is in general they will be demanding that the issue not be raised as it is 'closed' and should not be discussed any more, etc.

3 ( +6 / -3 )

She deserves to be president just for going through 11hrs of this garbage. The GOP candidates are whining that the presidential debates are too long at 3hrs. That's three hours where most of them won't speak for more than 15 minutes total. Hillary in the hot seat, so why was she cool and collected, while Gowdy was sweating like a nasty pig.

4 ( +6 / -2 )

bass: Funny, that's not what the parents think, in fact, the GOP and FOX have been their only salvation or do you want to talk mess about the families as well?

You threw away the families when you admitted that the investigation was a political witch hunt. The only thing you are trying to save is the Republican party and the graves of 4 Americans is what you are standing on. I do give you credit for backing off a bit once the emails became the focus, unlike others on here.

Maybe it's time for an investigation of your party. I'd like to see email records from any Republican who has worked on this.

4 ( +5 / -1 )

"seeking to avoid any mishap that might damage her presidential campaign"

Hillary would have to be beheaded or nearly so before there was enough damage to prevent her from beating the Donald or whoever wins the Republican nomination.

-2 ( +1 / -3 )

kabukideathOCT. 23, 2015 - 05:39PM JST Benghazi wouldn't have happened in the first place if Obama hadn't attacked Libya without congressional approval. This is just one result of his actions.

Meh, but not a word for the 4000 dead US soldiers and hundreds of thousands of dead when the Republicans touched off the unnecessary blaze that engulfed the middle east? What, that was ok because congress was forced to approve it or be screamed down as a freedom hating terrorist hugger?

This is pure Republican Bubble® insanity.

3 ( +6 / -3 )

And yet again, more sand-box retorts.

Translation part II: we're still tongue-tied without a decent believable excuse.

You guys really are desperate (here, just cut and paste "I know you are, Dems!" to save yourself a bit of time!), but I understand the frustration you must be feeling.

No frustration, as long as Hillary has a untrustworthy factor, I'm good to go. Yeah, I understand the lemming Hillary lovers will dive off a cliff with her no matter what, but as for the general population, she's pretty much done.

You see the unshaven picture of Gowdy in the press? I wouldn't want to look in the mirror either if I were him.

As if Hillary is a Cameron Diaz.

Haha.. this from a guy who has done NOTHING but cut and paste on the entire issue since the... I forget how many times they've investigated this issue already.

The same as you guys, so what gives?

How many since the first time, bass? We know it's been longer and more expensive than Watergate.

Compared to Hillary has done, Watergate doesn't even come in to a comfortable second.

What party is he running for, bass? I know that's a tough one...

He's as conservative as Jim Webb and Chaffee are real Deomcrats, give me a break.

"in fact, the GOP and FOX have been their only salvation or do you want to talk mess about the families as well?"

No way, homie! You libs have that totally covered.

If that's their only 'salvation', I feel sorry for them, but yes, the GOP and the committee are literally spitting on the graves of the dead men with this issue -- and you cannot deny it.

Nor should they give up or are you insinuating that the parents should give up finding the truth, knowing that Clinton is a hibitual liar? Why is there a discrepancy between her emails in question in 2012, lack and disappearance of many of her mails dealing with that very issue? The parents should walk away because Hillary Clinton says so? Again, no one with a functioning brain believes that.

You know for a FACT they certainly aren't doing it with the purpose of getting to the bottom of the issue, and most certainly not to honor the fallen;

Of course they are.

it is, as has been admitted by numerous Republicans, a smear campaign against Hilary Clinton.

No, just one idiot that made a gaffe or are you saying Biden made a gaffe the other day when he suggested that Dems and the GOP are not enemies and NEED to work together? Ahhh, I see the similarity.

And now Gowdy himself has released the name of a CIA informant when he claimed HILARY was doing that but did not!!

He doesn't have to, hey, if it's good for Hillary to be secretive....

You can't make this stuff up!!

I say that everyday when I see that woman's face and Obama's, but am very relieved to know that it will all come to an end very soon.

You guys have been caught in the lie so many times on this one already you really just need to admit it before it gets even more laughable.

I say the exact same thing about the Dems, now you know why Trump and Carson are kicking ass and the Dems.....well....Lol

The delicious irony is that next year leading up to the elections when Hilary is mentioning the MILLIONS of dollars of tax money Republicans wasted on this and came up with nothing at all new, the spitting on the graves of the dead, and the circus the GOP is in general they will be demanding that the issue not be raised as it is 'closed' and should not be discussed any more, etc.

Funny, with $20Trillion in debt and printed money that's making the Chinese bite their fingernails to the bone and you guys have the blatant audacity to talk about GOP spending? When Democrats practically invented the words "debt and taxation" I always get a deep chuckle at how delusional Democrats are when it comes to basic things...such as reality.

You threw away the families when you admitted that the investigation was a political witch hunt.

Hmmm, so when Obama makes a gaffe, it should be dismissed, NO matter how idiotic or not well-thought out, but if a conservative makes a gaffe, it's true, it's fact and the words are connected to the GOP as one monolithic group that is devoid (like most liberals) of independent thought?

The only thing you are trying to save is the Republican party and the graves of 4 Americans is what you are standing on. I do give you credit for backing off a bit once the emails became the focus, unlike others on here.

First of all, I don't speak for No one and definitely not the GOP. What in blazes are you talking about? ROFL. I think you were watching Colbert comedy skits. Hillary is the one that mailed Chelsea and told her that she was under a terrorist attack, there was NO mention of a video, she told the Egyptians and the Libyan the same thing. So then Hillary lied about that as well? OR she didn't write that mail, she just conjured it up out of nowhere? ROFL.

Maybe it's time for an investigation of your party. I'd like to see email records from any Republican who has worked on this.

Yaawwn, uh-huh. My cousin works at Home Depot, they're having a huge sale on ladders tomorrow, please let me know if you Dems need a few.

-6 ( +4 / -10 )

You all just crack me up. A massive 47-story steel frame building, building #7, free falls in 6.5 seconds, and you all are chasing your Bengazi tails.

"The Power Of The MSM Commands YOU!"

-4 ( +0 / -4 )

'She considers the GOP as an enemy - and she'll divide the nation more than now!!!'

And noticed how Biden debunked that. I was like WOW!

You're right. People should stop the stubborn, childish, partisan mud-slinging and character assassinations which just create division.

Both parties are to blame for that!

She deserves to be president just for going through 11hrs of this garbage.

That has got to be the absolute funniest joke of the entire year. I retweeted that one. ROFL

Hillary in the hot seat, so why was she cool and collected, while Gowdy was sweating like a nasty pig.

Men usually perspire more than women anyway. But if remember, the FBI is listening and if they even get a whiff that she mislead or lied or withheld ANY info, she's toast. Gowdy has nothing to worry about, he didn't lie about anything and he doesn't have to worry about losing his job or NOT being nominated to the highest position in the world.

Meh, but not a word for the 4000 dead US soldiers and hundreds of thousands of dead when the Republicans touched off the unnecessary blaze that engulfed the middle east?

That's because the vast majority of casualties were caused overwhelmingly by the sectarian violence, that's more likely the reason why.

What, that was ok because congress was forced to approve it or be screamed down as a freedom hating terrorist hugger?

Hey, we were force fed Obamacare, NO one asked the majority of Americans if that was Kosher.

This is pure Republican Bubble® insanity.

Trying to solve Democratic looniness.

-6 ( +3 / -9 )

Would it have been too much to ask the Republicans to sync up their conspiracy theories so they had at least some measure of internal logic? For the team that usually exhibits perfect message discipline, this was outright bizarre. The crap coming out of their gobholes was all over the place!

Here are the five or six mutually contradictory BENGAZZZIZIZIZIIZIIIIIIII!!! fantasies floated yesterday:

Was it that she didn't care? Or that she wanted to run a victory lap and declare "mission accomplished" (which is the worst thing ever as long as your name isn't George Bush), or that Sydney Blumenthal runs a secret shadow government, or that she met with al Qaeda in Libya right before the attack (which was a real thing at the hearing), or that she didn't personally invite every ambassador to her house, or that she LIED when blaming the attack on that internet video?

Seriously, folks. The Republican Party is broken.

4 ( +7 / -3 )

Would it have been too much to ask the Republicans to sync up their conspiracy theories

How is it a conspiracy theory when Hillary dumps the majority of her emails pertaining to Benghazi, but keeps the others or blames it on a video or when she calls up the Egyptian president and the Libyan PM and tells them that it was a Jihadist attack right from the start or when Hillary called her own daughter and told her it was a terrorist attack.

I think the real conspiracy theory is the one where libs try to make it seem that Hillary is an innocent Saint. On that part, Yeah, I believe it's a conspiracy theory.

so they had at least some measure of internal logic? For the team that usually exhibits perfect message discipline, this was outright bizarre. The crap coming out of their gobholes was all over the place!

Right! So then why couldn't Hillary just tell the truth? Remember, the FBI are taking notes as well.

Here are the five or six mutually contradictory BENGAZZZIZIZIZIIZIIIIIIII!!! fantasies floated yesterday:

It just kills you libs that, Hillary's box is somewhat shrinking. LOL

Was it that she didn't care? Or that she wanted to run a victory lap and declare "mission accomplished" (which is the worst thing ever as long as your name isn't George Bush),

What was far worse was when Obama said, if you like your plan, you can keep it or when Biden said, Iraq will be a success and be one of the biggest achievements of the Obama legacy, don't forget ISIS is just a JV team.

Yeah, libs take victory laps as well.

or that Sydney Blumenthal runs a secret shadow government, or that she met with al Qaeda in Libya right before the attack (which was a real thing at the hearing), or that she didn't personally invite every ambassador to her house, or that she LIED when blaming the attack on that internet video?

With the exception of a shadowy government, you're right about the video and her lying about it.

Seriously, folks. The Republican Party is broken.

You guys have Bernie Sanders and you say the GOP is broken? Then the DNC is hopelessly lost in a Northern California Woodstock reunion style concert.

-5 ( +3 / -8 )

'You're right. People should stop the stubborn, childish, partisan mud-slinging and character assassinations which just create division.'

'Both parties are to blame for that!'

I fully agree. This is a prime example. People should really stop the partisan nonsense, shouldn't they? As a non-partisan who views everything through the sharp eye of a journalist, I knew we could count on you for a rational look at this.

3 ( +4 / -1 )

JImizo

The problem is the Republican party. If you do not see that, you are not 'non-partisan'

You are blind.

0 ( +3 / -3 )

Pathetic

-8 ( +0 / -8 )

I fully agree. This is a prime example. People should really stop the partisan nonsense, shouldn't they? As a non-partisan who views everything through the sharp eye of a journalist, I knew we could count on you for a rational look at this.

That's why, I said what I said.

-6 ( +4 / -10 )

Clinton was well prepared to debate. so when someone asked event she asked back when, who said. etc Before 2nd session asked who will quesrion, 8 yes snd 7 no. Finally she had io use cough drops and plenty water cups were brought to her while chairman was making speech and demanding yes or no trying to shut her up.11 hours

3 ( +3 / -0 )

So the inquisition is over, and the judgment is in:

Whereas Republicans were hoping to break Clinton, she broke them.

Had it been me, I would've jumped over my witness table and punched one of those a--holes within 20 minutes of their bs. Clinton's restraint was unreal. Unflappable. Sober. It was a marathon designed to break her, but it was the Republicans on the committee who broke first, spittle flying in the final hours.

1 ( +3 / -2 )

Trump poll is no2 now after he praised Bifen, medias praised her not revealing WH involverment and skillfully protected her former aides. .

1 ( +1 / -0 )

For Clinton, the political theater offered opportunity and potential pitfalls. It gave her a high-profile platform to show her self-control and command of foreign policy. But it also left her vulnerable to claims that she helped politicize the Benghazi tragedy.

However, five hours into the hearing, Republicans had yet to ask the Democratic presidential front-runner a single question about the night of Sept. 11, 2012, itself.

Well the Shia Teas had their Benghazi Bacchanalia, drunk for the eighth time on threat and innuendo. The Americans saw Madame Clinton at her best. Composed and resonsive to even the most decript Shia Tea inquiry.

As reported: "the probe has now cost U.S. taxpayers more than $4.5 million and, after 17 months, has lasted longer than the 1970s Watergate investigation."

As reported by Former Speaker of the House contender, California Congressman Kevin McCarthy, (R), the whole affair was a public relations smear on the former First Lady, as the Shia Tea's Freedom Causus has only obstruction and crisis as their governance program.

Clearly the GOP-Shia Tea has more than enough money to waste on their window dressing and baseless scrutiny. It's only the taxpayers' cash used for political stagecraft. Heck, their boy AWOL Bush did the same thing for years on a bigger scale. The GOP Tea, one lie is as good as another since all they have are lies.

2 ( +2 / -0 )

So the inquisition is over, and the judgment is in:

Not for the parents.

Whereas Republicans were hoping to break Clinton, she broke them.

And the people gave Clinton the middle finger. Generally speaking, she has a astronomical problem with trust, she's not likable, she is ONLY popular with blinded, cane walking, suck ups that would take a 15mm in the head No matter what happens! And everyone else, has more common sense NOT to pull that lever for her.

Had it been me, I would've jumped over my witness table and punched one of those a--holes within 20 minutes of their bs.

And you would've gotten pummeled to pure USDA ground meat by the security and before you took a full step and realized what happened.

Clinton's restraint was unreal. Unflappable. Sober.

As well as the FBI watching and taking notes.

It was a marathon designed to break her,

No, it was about to get to the TRUTH as to what really happened to the 4 Americans that died, the parents want to know and the people, the PEOPLE (NOT Clinton loyalists) want to know the truth once and for all.

but it was the Republicans on the committee who broke first, spittle flying in the final hours.

If ANYONE and I mean, anyone that was having a meltdown was Elijah Cummings screaming like a lunatic and everyone looking at him as if this guy has completely lost his mind.

-2 ( +1 / -3 )

More funny:

Call it the Committee To Increase Hillary Clinton's Fundraising.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2015/10/hillary-clinton-campaign-benefits-benghazi-hearing-215107#ixzz3pR0Y3hAY

Suck on that!

3 ( +3 / -0 )

So in the hearing it was revealed that Clinton sent an email to her daughter telling her that an Al Qaeda affiliated group planned and carried out the attack. She communicated with the Libyan foreign minister and agreed that the killings were the result of a planned terrorists attack. Four days later she stood in front of the caskets of the four dead Americans and their families and lied saying the attack was motivated by a spontaneous attack over a year old video. As if demonstrators carry around RPG's and heavy machine guns. Weeks later Obama stood in front of the UN and lied telling the world that his re-election campaign message that Al Qaeda was on the run was still in true - despite all of the information to the contrary that the Obama administration was hiding from the public. Sure four people under their responsibility are dead due to the fact that they ignored literally hundreds of pleas for improved security. But hey - he got re-elected, what difference - at this point - does it make?

-2 ( +2 / -4 )

Suck on that

Buddy, The only thing I will be sucking on today is an ice cold German Pilsener at my local Oktoberfest. Prost!

But if you think Hillary is on track because she's getting more fundraisers, then you really don't understand how politics and campaigning works, she was going to have donors regardless of what happened, problem was, should they go to her or Bernie...just in case. Had she'd gone down, either Bernie or Biden would have gotten all the donors, but Biden is not running and it seems (at least for now) that Hillary looks ok to go....for now.

@wolf

Yeah, we know, you make sense, it's all there and it's all fact and documented, but you know liberals hate the truth. They will always resort to name calling, making excuses or attacking you with past irrelevant crap that either No one is thinking about or No one really cares and it shows in their inability to be honest with themselves and to admit their own shortcomings. At least conservatives can admit when they screw up, they just for the most part take it on the chin. Not the Democrats. They will fight tooth and nail to hopefully try and change your thinking to align it with a suitable narrative to fit their agenda.

-2 ( +1 / -3 )

'They ( liberals )will always resort to name calling, making excuses or attacking you with past irrelevant crap that either No one is thinking about or No one really cares'

It's truly stunning how you can agree with me about mindless partisan mud-slinging and then go on another insanely generalized, partisan rant about liberals. Name calling? We've already had 'witch' on this thread and your list of febrile names for Obama and Hillary is as extensive as any I've ever come across.

What's the retort? Yes, but he/she started it?

Grow up. The Republicans have shot themselves in the foot here and Hillary Clinton swatted them away like flies. She was too smart, too savvy and just too good. Take this one 'on the chin' as you believe the conservatives do so well.

3 ( +3 / -0 )

@Jimizo

Name calling? We've already had 'witch' on this thread and your list of febrile names for Obama and Hillary is as extensive as any I've ever come across.

Reminds me of the old days when Lefty's here used to call Bush 'Chimp' and associate him with Hitler. Try that with the current president and you are likely to have the censors intercept your comments.

Republicans are serving the public interest and open government by exposing Hillary's lies and by exposing her hidden communications system. If a high government official is callous enough to stand in front of the coffins of dead subordinates and lie to their families about the circumstances of their deaths, it serves the public interests to inform the public of those lies. If a government official mixes her private interests with her public responsibilities the people should know. If the Democrat party then decide to elect Hillary to be their candidate for president then that is an indication of the flawed character of the majority of Democrat voters.

-4 ( +0 / -4 )

f a high government official is callous enough to stand in front of the coffins of dead subordinates and lie to their families about the circumstances of their deaths, it serves the public interests to inform the public of those lies.

Wolfpack, the topic here is Clinton, not Nixon, Reagan or GWB.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Republicans are serving the public interest and open government by exposing Hillary's lies and by exposing her hidden communications system.

And your response to the well-known and admitted charges of a partisan investigation over the 4 coffins? Let us know when you are ready to deal with that, if ever.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

Hillary is 68 now. Sanders is fighting against Hillary now. Hillary? She is fighting against GOP.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

The committee made her look like a president in waiting. Cool, intelligent, and fast on her feet. As stated earlier, I'm not a fan of hers but even her enemies must have realized they'd blown it after seeing her handle that partisan ugly ordeal. And she was alone!

0 ( +0 / -0 )

She is in our city in NV, not to gamble in Casino but to do fund raising and to get support. There are many Larino well-to-do Dem members here.

1 ( +1 / -0 )

They didn't spend this much time looking into the first 9/11. This is a smear campaign, pure and simple.

0 ( +0 / -0 )

Login to leave a comment

Facebook users

Use your Facebook account to login or register with JapanToday. By doing so, you will also receive an email inviting you to receive our news alerts.

Facebook Connect

Login with your JapanToday account

User registration

Articles, Offers & Useful Resources

A mix of what's trending on our other sites