Monday February 13, 2012

Europe stunned by Irish rejection of EU reform treaty

PARIS —

Europe was left reeling Friday by Irish voters’ rejection of an EU reform treaty, even as French and German leaders argued it could be kept alive if other members pushed on with ratification.

The result of the Irish referendum was a major blow, with Czech President Vaclav Klaus insisting that the Lisbon Treaty was now “finished” and Luxembourg Prime Minister Jean-Claude Juncker conceding it would at least miss its January 1 target for coming into effect.

Austria said the Irish “no” vote was an unmitigated “failure” for Europe.

“You can’t dress it up any other way,” said Austrian Foreign Minister Ursula Plassnik, while her Spanish counterpart Miguel Angel Moratinos acknowledged it was “not good news.”

Other leaders and senior EU officials refused to sound the death-knell for the treaty, which aimed to create a full-time EU president and foreign policy chief and streamline the workings of the 27-member bloc.

“We take note of the democratic decision of the Irish citizens with all due respect, even though we regret it,” French President Nicolas Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angela Merkel said in a joint statement.

Noting that the Lisbon Treaty has already been ratified by 18 EU countries, they said they hoped other member states would “continue the process”—a call echoed by European Commission chief Jose Manuel Barroso.

“As a supporter of the treaty, the European Commission would have hoped for another result. However, we respect the outcome of the referendum,” Baroso said, adding that the remaining ratifications should “take their course.”

Britain was among those who quickly pledged to move ahead and adopt the treaty.

“It’s right that we continue with our own process,” said Foreign Secretary David Miliband, shortly after Irish Prime Minister Brian Cowen said there was no “quick fix” following his country’s “no” vote.

Gordon Brown’s government had come under strong pressure to offer British voters a referendum on the treaty, but the Lisbon Treaty will proceed towards its third reading in its parliament’s upper House of Lords on Wednesday.

“We have to wait to see what the Irish government and the Irish people propose to do as a result of this. We’ll need all countries to take a view and then to decide what to do next,” Miliband added.

The Netherlands, whose voters helped plunge the bloc into one of its worst crises three years ago by rejecting the treaty’s predecessor, the draft constitution, also vowed that it would ratify the text.

But Czech President Klaus argued that it was “no longer possible” to carry on as before. The Czech Republic, which will take over the presidency of the EU in January, is among those that has yet to ratify the treaty.

The current holder of the EU presidency, Slovenia, said the treaty remained a key building block in efforts to make Europe “more efficient, more democratic and transparent”.

While most countries said they accepted Ireland’s verdict, their disappointment at the result was palpable.

“By voting no, the Irish people have put the brakes on the development of the EU. The Irish ‘No’ will affect us all. The EU’s competitiveness is going to suffer,” said Estonian President Toomas Hendrik Ilves.

“The ‘No’ to the Lisbon Treaty in Ireland, one of the EU member states that has most enjoyed the benefits of the EU, is very regrettable,” Ilves said.

Portugal, whose capital gave its name to the treaty, was optimistic that the way ahead would become clearer after a crisis summit in Brussels on Thursday and that Europe still had the desire to overcome this major hurdle.

“We are convinced that the political willingness that led to the compromise of Lisbon is still there,” Portuguese Foreign Minister Luis Amado told the Lusa news agency.

But Prime Minister Jose Socrates said he saw the Irish “No” as a “personal defeat” after it was signed by EU leaders in the Portuguese capital.

Slovak President Ivan Gasparovic said that Europe should enter into a similar period of “reflexion” to the one that followed the breakdown of talks on the EU’s draft constitution, which the Lisbon Treaty was supposed to resolve.

Poland’s Prime Minister Donald Tusk said it was important to avoid a “two-speed” European structure, adding that Europe must find “solutions which take into account the fears of the Irish, without throwing into question the treaty’s reforms.”

“The European Union has overcome difficult moments and each time it has come out of the crisis stronger, ready for new endeavors and challenges. I’m sure that this time things will be the same,” he added.

Poland’s eurosceptic President Lech Kaczynski has so far failed to sign the treaty which was approved by his country’s parliament in April.

Tusk said Kaczynski could sign the treaty shortly.

One of the EU’s most recent entrants, Bulgaria, for its part, expressed a belief that such a solution could be found “in less than a week,” according to European Affairs Minister Gergana Grancharova.

Wire reports

  • 0

    Triumvere

    Europeams, do you really want to be part this EU? The constitution was rejected by the people in several European states, and they brought it back as a "treaty" only this time, 99% of Europeans were not allowed to vote about it. So now it has been rejected again, and the powers that be vow that they will press on; it will return again, in a slightly altered form, in a manner that prevents the people from having their say.

    Why would you want to be part of something that stifles your voice and ignores your preferences? This is not democracy. Obviously there are Europeans who agree with me (they are the ones voting "No" and their numbers are significant), but it amazes me how many people say things along the lines of "why should Europeans vote on it? we have elected officials to decided what is best for us."

  • 0

    bebert

    God bless the Irish. When the people are allowed to vote, the answer is no. That is why the European elite have tried to skirt democracy and have the so-called "reform" treaty passed by the government bodies alone. This is the same tricky way unpopular international treaties like NAFTA are passed in the Americas. I wouldn't be surprised if the American and European elites weren't exchanging notes on how to best get around the will of their citizen-subjects.

  • 0

    Scrote

    The Irish will be made to vote again and again until they vote "yes". That's the way it works.

    At least the Irish voters had a say; the UK government refused to honour their commitment to a referendum.

  • 0

    LIBERTAS

    The link shown here is from an Irish radio interview with Jim Corr, who's the only guy in the mostly girl band (his sisters) "The Corrs" and in it he explains all the elements of the treaty of Lisbon that the politicians tried to hide from the electorate. You decide: http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/6991

  • 0

    WilliB

    The voters have voted against the Euro constitution every time they were asked -- in France, in Holland, and now in Ireland. The EU response is to go ahead anyway. Luckily, in most countries the populace is not asked and the pesky matter of democratic accountability is settled in smokey back rooms in Brussels.

    Isn`t it great to see the EU demonstrate how to handle democracy. Putin is surely impressed.

  • 0

    WilliB

    Libertas:

    " You decide: http://www.wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/6991 "

    I decide that by quoting an illuminati and 9/11 conspiracy nutcase you are insulting the Irish voters. Yes, the EU treaty is an undemocratic scam, but one can argue that rationally, without bringing in UFOs and black helicopters.

Login to leave a comment

OR

Follow us

More in World

View all

View all