Monday May 28, 2012

Fallen satellite most likely in Pacific: NASA

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

  • -1

    noriyosan73

    Many North Americans own personal spas (hot tubs or "onsens) in their backyards. They are full of people watching the sky and enjoying a nice glass of wine. 73% of the Earth is covered by water. "Come on satellite, try to hit the water."

  • -2

    100million n U won?

    Come on satellite, try to hit the water.

    What an asinine comment.

    Hope YOU were in the water nori. Haha. Isn't that funny... not.

  • 2

    edojin

    Didn't hit here ... in downtown Tokyo ... so guess we Tokyoites are safe ...

  • -4

    the_odeman

    Didn't hit here ... in downtown Tokyo ... so guess we Tokyoites are safe ...

    no one cares about Tokyoites except for Tokyoites

  • 1

    Madverts

    Wow I'm trying to feel reassured that the biggest lump about to hit earth "somewhere" is a meger 135kg!

  • 2

    Farmboy

    I'm just amazed that Nasa would say that it's down but we don't know where. It just sounds so lame.

  • 1

    YuriOtani

    Well once it starts to break up, tracking it would be hard. I have a new pool, no sign of it in my community :)

  • 0

    zichi

    BBC News is saying it broke up over Canada.

  • -2

    Taka313

    I'm just amazed that Nasa would say that it's down but we don't know where. It just sounds so lame.

    Goes to show how far NASA has fallen. Used to be, those guys would have precise tracking on that baby with an abacus.

    Taka

  • 0

    cactusJack

    This news story has been milked by the media big time, hoping it would fall on populated areas so that they could get a big scoop. You had a better chance to win the lotto twice than get hit by it.

  • 1

    SimondB

    The debris has no toxic contamination, but there could be sharp edges, NASA officials have said

    Sounds like something my mother used to say when I was a child.

  • 0

    Hide Suzuki

    LOL at SimondB's comment, yeah, watch out, it has sharp edges !

  • 0

    Serrano

    "Goes to show how far NASA has fallen. Used to be, those guys would have precise tracking"

    Anyone else able to track the debris?

    "Well, once it starts to break up, tracking would be hard"

    Exactly, exactly!

    NASA: "There could be sharp edges"

    This struck me as very funny. I mean, there could be chunks of flaming-hot metal hitting you at high speed too, right?

  • 0

    zichi

    There was more chance to be struck by lightening than a piece of the satellite?

  • 1

    JapanGal

    Can send people to the moon, but cannot figure out where the satellite parts went to?

  • 0

    Serrano

    JapanGal - You don't agree with YuriOtani's comment - "Well, once it starts to break up, tracking would be hard"? You think it's easy?

  • -1

    Alex80

    So lame! =__= This debris was dangerous, I don't care if the chances that it would hit population was low, it still existed. I'd like that the scientists were more responsable towards common people, but stuff like this, and nuclear disasters, only shows how careless and selfish they are.

  • -1

    zichi

    They should used it for missile practice and shot it right out of the sky. I guess in coming weeks parts of it will be on Ebay?

  • 0

    CrazyJoe

    I was hoping that a big chunk would land on Kim Jong-il's head of the hermit kingdom, but it didn't.

  • 0

    Jared Norman

    Maybe we should put laser sensors on sharks to find the parts

  • 0

    Callme Ish

    A US Navy Destroyer can "see" a US Quarter 250 miles out in space. Why are they saying they don't know where everyone of the 300 little pieces went to? Of course they know, exactly.

    Must be fear of liability, or by admitting real data, the real danger is make public knowledge.

Login to leave a comment

OR

Follow us

More in World

View all

View all