Heads roll in British expenses row
LONDON —
Britain’s parliamentary expenses row claimed its first scalps Thursday, as Prime Minister Gordon Brown suspended a former minister and an opposition MP was forced to quit by the latest revelations.
Brown, struggling to show leadership over an issue which is exacerbating his poll woes, took action after former environment minister Elliot Morley was found to have claimed for a non-existent home loan.
Morley blamed his expenses claims on “sloppy accounting” as pressure mounted for a criminal investigation.
“Where standards are transgressed and mistakes are made we have got to take action,” Brown said, announcing Morley’s suspension from the parliamentary Labour party.
And he warned: “Where disciplinary action is necessary it will, and will immediately, be taken. If there are any other disciplinary cases where we have to take action, we will take action immediately.”
Embarrassing details of MPs’ claims for everything from swimming pools to tennis courts and even a moat have been revealed over the last week, rocking all three main parties.
But Brown has the most to lose, as polls indicate his Labour Party faces losing office to the opposition Conservatives in elections due within a year.
In the latest details published by the Daily Telegraph, it emerged that Morley claimed more than 16,000 pounds ($24,000) for monthly interest payments during an 18-month period after the loan was paid off.
Morley, who could face legal action over the revelations, accepted his mistake.
“I deeply apologize for such sloppy accounting in a very loose and shambolic allowance system but there is nobody to blame but myself and I take full responsibility for this,” he told the Scunthorpe Telegraph.
A lobby group, the Taxpayers’ Alliance, demanded a police investigation—and warned of legal action.
“If they (police) do not investigate, then the Taxpayers’ Alliance will consider bringing a private prosecution against Mr Morley and any other MPs who appear to have broken the law,” said alliance chief executive Matthew Elliot.
Earlier the Conservatives announced that lawmaker Andrew MacKay had resigned as an aide to party leader David Cameron after it emerged he and his wife, also a Tory MP, had claimed expenses for two home loans at the same time.
MacKay quit after voluntarily submitting his expense claims to party officials.
“That examination of Mr MacKay’s past allowances revealed an unacceptable situation that would not stand up to reasonable public scrutiny,” said a spokesman for Cameron.
MacKay claimed expenses for the mortgage on a London home until April last year, at the same time as his wife Julie Kirkbride claimed an allowance on her constituency home.
The expenses revelations have caused outrage in Britain, which is weathering its worst recession in decades, and prompted Brown to promise an independent review of all parliamentary expenses dating back four years.
Cameron, who is hoping to oust Brown in elections due by next June, has sought to make political capital from the row by ordering his lawmakers to repay any sums deemed unacceptable.
Even before the scandal, many commentators said Cameron is virtually certain to win the premiership next year. The latest opinion polls show the Conservatives on 39% against Labour’s 26%.
Meanwhile, parliament’s reputation took another hit when a House of Lords committee found two peers guilty of misconduct for offering to help undercover reporters posing as lobbyists seek changes to legislation in return for cash.
Labour peers Lord Truscott and Lord Taylor of Blackburn face suspension.
Wire reports








Order by Time Order by Popularity
5 Comments
Login to comment
0
nandakandamanda
Quote from above: "parliament’s reputation took another hit when a House of Lords committee found two peers guilty of misconduct for offering to help undercover reporters posing as lobbyists seek changes to legislation in return for cash."
The funny thing is that when Tony Blair removed the hereditaries from the House of Lords in 1999, he swept out the cheapest workforce you could ever imagine. He never suggested how the threadbare would be replaced or who would pay for any follow-up system. Politically popular at the time, it left a smoking hole in the system.
Most of them received no salaries. To cheat in any way on expenses was unthinkable. They were extrememly careful on how they filed for expenses, not least because of the repeated warnings on honesty. I speak from personal knowledge of the system. To see what is happening now in this brave new world, and listening to some of these 'excuses' makes me feel sick.
0
Triumvere
All of them crooks.
0
ca1ic0cat
Is this the end of the Labour government? Can Brown hang on as PM? Stay tuned.
0
Bento
'Brave new world', where have you been?.Lloyd George introduced salaries for MP's. These expenses junkies should be charged with fraud..then vote out.However is small bear compared to the backhanders flying around capitol hill.
0
grafton
Bento at 03:20 AM JST - 16th May
nandakandamanda is talking about the Lords not the Commons. Currently the lords can claim over 300 pounds a day in expenses, so paid or not that is a very good income. More than most people get for working, real work that is.
Back to top