Friday February 17, 2012

Hezbollah prisoners freed in exchange for dead Israeli soldiers

BEIRUT —

Five Lebanese prisoners freed by Israel arrived to a hero’s welcome in Lebanon Wednesday, hours after Hezbollah handed over the bodies of two Israeli soldiers seized by its guerrillas two years ago.

Among those freed in a prisoner swap greeted with triumph in Lebanon but anguish in Israel was Samir Kantar , who was sentenced to five life terms for a 1979 triple murder, including of a child.

The prisoners were transported to Lebanon late afternoon in a convoy of four International Committee of the Red Cross vehicles via the Naqura border crossing, where they were cheered and applauded by crowds of Hezbollah supporters who had been waiting all day for their arrival.

They were then flown by helicopters to Beirut, where they were accorded a red carpet welcome by Lebanese President Michel Sleiman, Prime Minister Fuad Siniora, Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri, the entire cabinet and a host of lawmakers and religious leaders.

The five—Kantar and Hezbollah fighters Khaled Zidan, Maher Kurani, Mohammed Sarur and Hussein Suleiman—stood on a platform as Sleiman spoke and then shook hands with the politicians lined up to greet them.

“Your return is a new victory and the future in your presence will be a path in which we will realize the sovereignty of our territory and the liberty of our people,” Sleiman said.

“I tell Samir and his companions that they have a right to be proud of their country, their army and their resistance.”

Kantar kissed his mother, Siham Kantar, 71, after the meet and greet with the politicians as crowds and the media swarmed around him.

His mother had burst into tears while waiting earlier at the airport when she was told that her son had arrived in Naqura and was indeed free after more than 28 years in jail.

“I never gave up hope for a day,” she said, choked by emotion.

“This moment makes up for 30 years of waiting. I want to hug and kiss him. My only wish is to see him.”

The four freed Hezbollah fighters were captured in the July-August 2006 war which killed more than 1,200 people in Lebanon and 160 in Israel were also freed. They and Kantar were the last remaining Lebanese prisoners in Israeli jails.

Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah made a rare public appearance at celebrations attended by tens of thousands of people in the southern suburbs of Beirut Wednesday night.

“The period of defeat is over and the time of victory has arrived,” Nasrallah said at the celebrations marking the success of emptying Israeli jails of Lebanese prisoners.

“This people and this nation and this country that gave a clear picture to the world… cannot be defeated,” he added.

Kantar told the cheering crowds he thanked God for giving him the strength to endure his almost three-decade imprisonment, which made him the longest-serving Arab prisoner in Israel.

The five prisoners were released in exchange for the bodies of two Israeli soldiers, Ehud Goldwasser and Eldad Regev , captured on July 12, 2006.

The fate of the two soldiers was not known until their bodies were returned to Israel Wednesday morning.

“Today we hand over Ehud Goldwasser and Eldad Regev,” Hezbollah official Wafiq Safa said at Naqura, as men placed two black coffins on the ground amid a crowd of onlookers.

The mood in Israel had been sombre as it waited to learn the fate of Goldwasser and Regev, whose capture in a deadly cross-border raid in July 2006 triggered a devastating 34-day war in Lebanon.

“Both soldiers have been identified,” an army spokeswoman told AFP after forensic tests on the remains.

Goldwasser’s family broke down in cries of despair when they saw the footage of Hezbollah handing over the caskets, while neighbors gathered around the Regev home, lighting candles and quietly shedding tears.

“Eldad! Eldad! What have they done to you?” wailed Regev’s aunt Hana.

Many in Israel question whether the nation is paying too high a price for the return of the soldiers who are to be buried on Thursday, saying the swap risks bolstering its arch foes in the region.

Israel also was to transfer to Lebanon the remains of 199 Palestinian and Hezbollah fighters exhumed over the past week.

Among the first bodies handed over was that of Dalal al-Moghrabi , who led a bloody commando attack in 1978 that Israelis describe as the “Coastal Road Massacre.”

She was killed in a battle with Israeli forces after her group blew up a bus they had hijacked on the road between Tel Aviv and Haifa, killing 36 people.

Lebanese television showed footage of a convoy of trucks crossing into Lebanon Wednesday evening carrying the bodies of the remaining fighters.

They were due to be transported to Beirut Thursday morning, Hezbollah said in a statement.

Israel’s Jerusalem Post newspaper has billed the festivities in Lebanon as “a celebration of evil.”

Israeli commentators warned the swap had given a propaganda victory to Hezbollah, setting a dangerous precedent for any future exchanges and possibly encouraging new attempts by militant groups to seize Israeli soldiers.

Wire reports

  • 0

    adaydream

    Isreal and Hisbollah made the agreement and the swap. Let's hope outside or inside forces don't screw it up. < :-)

  • 0

    rajakumar

    Swap deal, is good ideas and very mature actions by Israel/Hezbollah/Hassan Nasrallah/Lebanon.

    Sign of more maturity in deals between Israel/Lebanon.

    Way to go Lebanon/Israel.

    This swap act and Mediterranean union ideas, are start of 2 good vibes for this region.

    There still need for a lot more work to be done, on more pro-active peace good vibes measures ,by all nations involved in middle east peace.

    It is a very difficult process, that need careful attention to all details of peace expansions.

    There still much trials,errors and efforts by all in this future peace pro-active efforts.

    There is still big gaps left undone, in this most difficult of efforts, that has had a high cost on all sides.

    Germany and EU,should do more swap deals and other deals for peace. WW2 contibuted to these woes.

    All post WW2, jewish and arab woes must be reduced by germany,UN,US, Asian and EU peace ingenuity. There will be problems and many woes towards peace in Middle east.

    Hope is always eternal and so are problems.

    Just a view, of mine.

  • 0

    Altria

    I think the Israelis got ripped off in that trade.

  • 0

    JackBerstein

    Oh, if you consider the over 1000 Lebanese civilians, including many children, that were killed by the Israelis in response to the capture of these two soldiers, the Lebanese are the ones that got ripped off. Why is the world's media focusing on the funeral of these to IDF guys.

  • 0

    Helter_Skelter

    This trade was a bad deal for Israel on so many levels...

    "Freed Lebanese prisoners vow to fight Israel"

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25723282/

  • 0

    USNinJapan2

    Jack

    Why is the world's media focusing on the funeral of these to IDF guys.

    Maybe because most of the world, at least the sensible members, sympathize more with Israel and its right to exist and defend its sovereignty than with with the Lebanese and Hezbollah. Shouldn't you be used to this reality by now?

  • 0

    JackBerstein

    USNin I agree that most of the world's media sympathize with Israel, but not its people, not anymore.

  • 0

    JackBerstein

    Let me rephrase that: I agree that most of the world's media, but not its people, sympathize with Israel.

  • 0

    Madverts

    USN,

    I sympathize with Israel's right to exist in peace, but I sure don't sympathize with the idiotic bombardment of the Lebanon in response to the kidnapping of two soldiers that were obviously dead from the outset.

  • 0

    romulus3

    Israelis love and protect their own. they say Israeli 1 corpse is worth 100 Arabs. admirable. in other countries its dog eat dog. In Israel, very little domestic crime exists.

  • 0

    JackBerstein

    Or as Noam Chomsky recounts the events: 'IDF kidnapping of civilians on June 24, Hamas capture of a soldier the next day, then the huge U.S.-Israeli escalation of attacks on Gaza... then the kidnapping of soldiers by Hezbollah, then the U.S.-Israeli destruction of most of Lebanon, justified by the pretense of outrage over kidnapping, which – to repeat – is demonstrated, conclusively, to be cynical fraud'."

    BTW, the soldiers were captured, not kidnapped. And early reports say they were captured within Lebanon.

  • 0

    Alinsky4prez

    What newspaper does Noam Chomsky propagandize for?And who is he,anyway? Like we say in Chicago,his name sounds a little funny,if you know what I mean.

  • 0

    kinniku

    Jack,

    BTW, the soldiers were murdered. If they had not been kidnapped (captured if you prefer) the attack on Lebanon would not have happened. Same with Gaza. If you want peace, it is better to act peaceful.

  • 0

    USNinJapan2

    Jack

    Chomsky? I thought you wanted people to take your posts seriously...

  • 0

    JackBerstein

    kinniku The attack on Lebanon was planned long before the two soldiers were taken. Olmert even admitted this to the Winograd Commission.

  • 0

    timeon

    while I think dialogue is essential and prisoner exchanges welcomed, I can't sympathise with whoever gives a hero's welcome to a murderer:

    "Samir Kantar was sentenced to three life terms for killing an Israeli man in front of his 4-year-old daughter, then killing the little girl by smashing her skull with his rifle butt."

    and the outcome of this exchange is, according to Hezbollah:

    "Haniyeh's spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri went further, saying the swap "shows that the only successful way to free the prisoners is by kidnapping soldiers."

  • 0

    skipthesong

    idiotic bombardment of the Lebanon" Look, when push comes to shove... how long must they sit back, hold back due to what YOU believe? I took it as basically, in simple terms a last straw otherwise they could have done it a loong time ago.

    Chomsky sounds Polish!

  • 0

    kinniku

    Jack,

    The attack on Lebanon was planned long before the two soldiers were taken. Olmert even admitted this to the Winograd Commission.

    This is completely incorrect. The Winograd Commission found just the opposite to be true actually. The Commision came to the conclusion that the war was not planned well.

    As far as the exchange goes, as I said before, hearing what is being said in Lebanon and Gaza does not give me hope that things will get better because of this. In fact, they sadly lead me to believe the opposite.

  • 0

    sushi

    kinniku,

    Your reply does not show that Jack is incorrect, and less so completely incorrect. The commission concluded Israel did not plan well. So they were incompetent, but they still planned it.

    Those soldiers were likely sent there on purpose.

  • 0

    Helter_Skelter

    two soldiers that were obviously dead from the outset.

    Madverts, I'd be interested in how you know this.

    Those soldiers were likely sent there on purpose.

    Sushi, let's hear your entire conspiracy theory.

  • 0

    kinniku

    sushi,

    Actually, it does show Jack (and yourself) to be incorrect. The finding showed there was little or no planning. In addition, Jack was incorrect about Olmert admitting that the attack was previously planned.

    Those soldiers were likely sent there on purpose.

    Blah, blah, blah...speaking of weak arguments. I see your vacation hasn't stopped you from making statements you cannot back up. The fact remains that the soldiers were kidnapped and they are dead. If neither of these two events had not happened, there would not have been an attack. You cannot say otherwise and you cannot prove otherwise. Neither could Jack. He completely misrepresented what was in the commision's report and you seem to be supporting that with no need for proof whatsoever.

  • 0

    kinniku

    One more thing, the commision specifically criticized Olmert for:

    "having no 'organized plan' in launching the war and called his move "misguided and rash judgment".

    So you are wrong about any supposed planning before the kidnappings.

    Olmert went into the attack without any experience and any planning. The not planned well part was once the attack got started. Even then, Israeli soldiers did not have the supplies they needed and operations were not planned out well.

    However, one thing these false arguments above prove is that there are people who would like to see the fighting continue and are willing to create "facts" in order to keep both sides hating each other. Unfortunately, statements from both Lebanon and Gaza indicate that this tactic is working to a certain degree to encourage future similar attacks when the agreement in the article should be the start on the road to peace.

  • 0

    JackBerstein

    kinniku, Why do you get the impression I made this up? I was referring to Olmert's admissions at the commission, not about the conclusion of the commission. According to Haaretz: "Prime Minister Ehud Olmert told the Winograd Commission that his decision to respond to the abduction of soldiers with a broad military operation was made as early as March 2006, four months before last summer's Lebanon war broke out." http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/834549.html

    The Independent also talks about it: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/olmert-planned-lebanon-war-before-soldiers-kidnap-439474.html

    I would say that it is your statement "Olmert went into the attack without any experience and any planning" that is completely incorrect.

  • 0

    kinniku

    Jack,

    I would say that it is your statement "Olmert went into the attack without any experience and any planning" that is completely incorrect.

    You brought up the Winograd Commision, not me. What I wrote is quoted from that commision's statement. It is not "my statement". The commision came to the conclusion that "Olmert went into the attack without any experience and any planning". If you feel I am wrong, please provide proof.

    Why do you get the impression I made this up? I was referring to Olmert's admissions at the commission, not about the conclusion of the commission.

    Ummm...because that is what you wrote? You wrote:

    The attack on Lebanon was planned long before the two soldiers were taken. Olmert even admitted this to the Winograd Commission.

    This makes it seem as though Olmert specifically planned the attack on Lebanon of the summer of 2006 before hand. Unfortunately, your articles say something different, don't they? They tell us that Olmert merely considered attacks as a response if soldiers were to be kidnapped. Sorry, but that is very different than claiming that he specifically planned the attack that happened in the summer of 2006 back in March. He did not. He merely suggested that the country of Israel attack Lebanon if soldiers were kidnapped during his term in office. He certainly did not say that he planned the attack in the summer of 2006. Headlines aside, the articles do not disagree with what I have written. Israel's policy is nothing new, Israel has generally attacked over such incidents in the past.

  • 0

    kinniku

    Jack,

    One more point, the ground attack that followed the air attacks of 2006 was done poorly and not planned. That is and was one of the biggest criticisms of Olmert both inside and outside of Israel.

  • 0

    Helter_Skelter

    Sushi

    So they were incompetent, but they still planned it.

    Prior to the war, Israel had contingency plans on what to do if soldiers were kidnapped by Lebanon. Israel also had contingency plans if soldiers were kidnapped by Gaza. All countries have contingency plans for military responses which is prudent, as anyone would agree. These are the plans they're talking about, not your dishonest interpretation.

    But I do agree that Israel was incompetent, as evidenced by Hezbollah's continued existence in Lebanon.

  • 0

    Madverts

    Skelter,

    "Madverts, I'd be interested in how you know this."

    Are you willing to bet the extremist asholes in full, demented jihad mode were going to keep them alive?

    It was a forgone conclusion for me.

  • 0

    Helter_Skelter

    Mdaverts,

    Are you willing to bet the extremist asholes in full, demented jihad mode were going to keep them alive

    They very well could have been kept alive and tortured for months before they were murdered. We'll see if something comes out on this but, unless you know something I don't, it's not a forgone conclusion they were dead from the outset.

  • 0

    sabiwabi

    Helter, Its interesting though that they make or discuss these plans just a few months before they send these soldiers as bait, to be sacrificed for the purpose of destroying Lebanon. Reminds me of Silverstein's leasing and changing the insurance on the WTC just months before they are destroyed.

  • 0

    kinniku

    sabiwabi,

    Yadda, yadda, yadda. You can keep playing the "I have no proof, but here's another conspiracy theory" all you want. It doesn't change the fact you have added nothing of substance to the discussion. Patrols of the Sheba Farms area are nothing to be considered unique or unusual. However, I am sure you will not have any trouble letting facts get in the way of your fantasies.

    Hezbollah did not have to capture those soldiers, nor did they have to kill them. However, they did both and Lebanon paid for it. I don't think the price was worth it.

  • 0

    sabiwabi

    kinniku

    Yadda, yadda, yadda.

    Yidda, yidda, yidda to you too. You can continue to pretend that Israel is only defending itself. I'm sure many believe your version of events, but fortunately many are finally catching on to these lies.

  • 0

    USARonin

    Israel is only defendin' herself.

    Givin' back those hills turned out to be a big mistake as I said it would.

    Those Muslim terrorists just used the territory to rocket and bomb Israel.

    USAR

  • 0

    kinniku

    sabiwabi,

    Specifically, what lies would you be talking about? If you cannot specifically give details of these 'lies', one can only make the logical conclusion that you are misrepresenting the facts. Are you claiming that Hezbollah did not capture the soldiers? If so, you would be wrong. Are you claiming the soldiers were not killed? If so, you would be wrong again.

    I do find it interesting that you continuously need to create a fantasy in order to make your points. The rest of society prefers to live in the real world with real facts to base their opinions on, not fantasies.

  • 0

    sabiwabi

    Nobody has ever claimed that the soldiers were not captured or that the soldiers were not killed, and you know that. Seems the only way you can "win" an argument is to misrepresent the other's posts. What does appear to be clear however is that the soldiers were captured inside Lebanon, and that they were probably sent there on purpose to help justify a massacre in Lebanon.

    Hezbollah did not have to capture those soldiers, nor did they have to kill them. However, they did both and Lebanon paid for it. I don't think the price was worth it.

    So if that was the price to pay for the capture of 2 soldiers, I'd hate to think what price Israel should pay for the capture, kidnapping, and murder of thousands, including many children. But I understand that for people like you, Jewish blood is infinitely more precious than anyone else's.

  • 0

    USARonin

    sabiwabi, so what's happened to all of Lebanon's Christians?

    Sad.

    USAR

  • 0

    kinniku

    sabiwabi,

    Nobody has ever claimed that the soldiers were not captured or that the soldiers were not killed, and you know that.

    You claimed something about being used as "bait" or "sacrificed" (with absolutely no proof or specifics. Surprise! Surprise!) That makes it look like Hezbollah had nothing to do with what happened. Of course, the opposite is true. You just don't like to talk about that. You enjoy creating fantastic diversions that have nothing to do with the topics at hand.

    Seems the only way you can "win" an argument is to misrepresent the other's posts.

    Huh uh (eyes rolling), where exactly did I "misrepresent" anything? I specifically and rather politely asked you what lies you were talking about. Funnily, you can't manage to be specific. That leads me to believe you don't actually believe what you write. Could you be a nice poster and tell me where the lies or misrepresentations are?

    What does appear to be clear however is that the soldiers were captured inside Lebanon, and that they were probably sent there on purpose to help justify a massacre in Lebanon.

    Hmmm...regardless of your record of misinformation, I will ask you again for specifics.

    One: You say it is "clear" the soldiers were captured in Lebanon. Proof and specifics?

    Two: Two you claim they were sent "on purpose". Proof and specifics?

    If you cannot provide this proof or any specifics, one has to come to the logical conclusion that you know as much about this situation as you do about dangers in certain parts of Iran (of course we know you don't know much about that.)

  • 0

    kinniku

    sabiwabi,

    Sorry for the horrible reality check (BTW, as anyone can read, it was not just a matter of two soldiers):

    Clashes spread to Lebanon as Hezbollah raids Israel JERUSALEM: The Lebanese guerrilla group Hezbollah surprised Israel with a bold daylight assault across the border on Wednesday, leading to fighting in which two Israeli soldiers were captured and at least eight killed, and elevating recent tensions into a serious two-front battle.

    http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/07/13/africa/web.0712mideast.php

  • 0

    kinniku

    So if that was the price to pay for the capture of 2 soldiers, I'd hate to think what price Israel should pay for the capture, kidnapping, and murder of thousands, including many children. But I understand that for people like you, Jewish blood is infinitely more precious than anyone else's.

    Why does everything end up being about "Jews" with you? I have said in this very thread that the Lebanonese War was a waste of innocent life. I have never suggested support for the war in Lebanon. However, Israel was already attacking Gaza as a reprisal for the kidnapping of a soldier there. Hezbollah knew full well what the potential result of their attacks and the kidnapping could be. Even with that in mind they attacked Israel and kidnapped and murdered the soldiers. If they had not done that, there would not have been a war in Lebanon and there would not have been the resulting bloodshed.

    Now that the exchange has been completed Hezbollah is using it to encourage more of the same and Hamas seems to want to join in. It is a shame and a horrible waste of life. Too many innocent people on both sides of this conflict have died needlessly. I can see this, why can't you?

  • 0

    sabiwabi

    However, Israel was already attacking Gaza as a reprisal for the kidnapping of a soldier there.

    Oh, I see, when Israel does something, its always as a reprisal. But when the Palestinians do something in reprisal, for stolen land or kidnapped women and children, that's terrorism.

    As for providing specifics, you always send me to Google when I ask you for specifics, why don't you google for the specifics. You'll find something that contradicts the version you get from your usual sources.

  • 0

    kinniku

    sabiwabi,

    Oh, I see, when Israel does something, its always as a reprisal.

    No, I never wrote that or even implied that. I was merely using the language of the International Herald Tribune article I linked. I am perfectly comfortable using the word 'attack' instead as I have in most of my post above in this thread. However, the word reprisal is often used to describe actions on both sides and even amongst Palestinian factions. So, I am not sure why you are focusing on the word reprisal. The fact remains Israel was attacking Gaza when Hezbollah attacked Israel with rockets and attacked, captured and killed Israeli soldiers. It was an easy guess that another attack on Hezbollah was possible based on what was going on in Gaza. That was and still is my point.

    But when the Palestinians do something in reprisal, for stolen land or kidnapped women and children, that's terrorism.

    In general, I try to stay away from these types of terms. After all, many people that were considered terrorists or rebels in countries such as Japan, the US, Israel and many other countries are now considered heroes by the citizens of their countries. Witness the Saigo Takamori statue in Ueno Park in Tokyo for example. However, as I mentioned earlier, the word reprisal has been used to describe actions on all sides, as have words such as 'attack'.

    As for providing specifics, you always send me to Google when I ask you for specifics, why don't you google for the specifics.

    Well, that is not true. In this very thread I provided you with a link to the International Herald Tribune. In our previous discussion, I provided you with links to Iran's official news agency the Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA). Now, it is your turn to provide some specifics.

    You'll find something that contradicts the version you get from your usual sources.

    Well, we will see if that is true if you ever get around to providing some specifics. As far as my sources, both IRNA and the International Herald Tribune are respected news agencies. What possible problem could you have with them?

  • 0

    kinniku

    sabiwabi,

    I took your advice and Googled "Lebanon War" The first hit was from Wikipedia, which I know you consider an acceptable source as you just used it on another thread yesterday.

    From Wikipedia: The conflict began when Hezbollah militants fired rockets at Israeli border towns as a diversion for an anti-tank missile attack on two armored Humvees patrolling the Israeli side of the border fence.[20] Of the seven Israeli soldiers in the two jeeps, two were wounded, three were killed, and two were captured and taken to Lebanon.[20]

    Now, what were your specifics, again?

Login to leave a comment

OR

Follow us

More in World

View all

View all