Friday February 17, 2012

IAEA chief hits out at U.S., Israel over Syrian reactor claims

VIENNA —

The U.N. atomic watchdog agency said Friday it would probe U.S. intelligence allegations that Syria was building a secret nuclear reactor with North Korea’s help.

But Syrian ambassador to the United States Imad Moustapha told reporters in Washington that the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) “is already cooperating with Syria. We have excellent relations ... They have never ever complained to us about anything.”

“We are not involved with North Korea in any illegal or internationally banned activities,” he added. “Syria does not have a plan or a project to acquire nuclear technology even for peaceful purposes.”

At the United Nations, Syrian Ambassador Bashar Jaafari concurred: “We have close cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). We are not afraid of this cooperation, on the contrary,” he told reporters.

“Syria has nothing to hide,” he added. “IAEA inspectors should go into Israel instead. The real danger is the Israeli nuclear arsenal.”

There was no immediate reaction from Pyongyang.

Earlier, the IAEA said it received U.S. information claiming that the facility destroyed by Israel in Syria last September was a nuclear reactor, and noted in a statement that it “will investigate the veracity of the information.”

“Syria has an obligation under its safeguards agreement with the IAEA to report the planning and construction of any nuclear facility,” it added.

On Thursday, the United States accused Syria of building a secret nuclear reactor with Pyongyang’s help, charging that the facility had a military purpose until Israel destroyed it in a September raid.

The IAEA chided both Israel and the United States for their handling of the matter.

It criticized Israel for acting on the allegations and bombing the purported reactor in a raid last September without giving IAEA inspectors an opportunity to investigate.

IAEA Director General Mohamed ElBaradei also “deplores the fact” that the information was not immediately passed on to the Vienna-based watchdog “in accordance with the guidelines of the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT),” the statement said.

“Under the NPT, the agency has a responsibility to verify any proliferation allegations in a non-nuclear weapon state party to the NPT,” the statement said.

“In light of the above, the director general views the unilateral military action by Israel as undermining the due process of verification that is at the heart of the non-proliferation regime,” it added.

The evidence comprised photographs taken inside the reactor showing construction of the shield for the reactor core, and control rods and refueling ports on top of the reactor.

Officials said the reactor and the building that housed it were similar in design to the North Korean reactor at Yongbyon, which produces plutonium.

Damascus rejected the allegations as “ridiculous.”

“The construction of this reactor was a dangerous and potentially destabilizing development for the region and the world. The Syrian regime must come clean before the world,” said White House spokeswoman Dana Perino.

“We have good reason to believe that reactor ... was not intended for peaceful purposes.”

A senior U.S. intelligence official said the reactor was destroyed in an Israeli air strike on Sept 6, 2007 as it was nearing completion, although it had not been loaded with uranium fuel.

“Israel felt that this reactor posed such an existential threat that a different approach was required,” the official said.

France demanded Syria come completely clean on its nuclear activities.

“We had contact yesterday with the Americans, at their initiative, and we were able to exchange analyses and information,” said a spokeswoman for the foreign ministry, Pascale Andreani.

“The clandestine construction of a nuclear reactor would be a grave infringement by Syria of its NPT obligations,” she said, adding that “we are also very concerned by the proliferation activities of North Korea.”

The revelations could upset six-country talks aimed at dismantling North Korea’s nuclear program, although chief U.S. nuclear negotiator Christopher Hill said the intelligence suggested there was no “ongoing cooperation” between Pyongyang and Syria.

AFP

  • 0

    Bgood41

    The IAEA should focus of doing their duty and thus staying away from politic. Israel, how problematic may be; has the right to self-defense. There is a possibility, if foretold in advance; El Baradei's office might misuse the timing factor and allowing the Syria to cover up all evidences related to this violation. I do not think El Baradai is honestly performing his job as it should. His delaying tactics favoring Iran is such a clear case of misusing the IAEA office. Please do your assignment, and let the politicians who are paying the bill at the UN play their games. It reminds me about the boxing judges for Ray Jones in the Olympic in S.Korea. Honestly without agenda will better promote world peace, OK.

  • 0

    Zaphod

    Mohammed Al-Baradai is upset he did not get prior information so that he could warn his Syrian co-religionists. What a surprise!

    Remember, this is the guy who ignored and white-washed Iran`s secret nuclear program until a group of dissidents (not he!) came out with it and broke the secret.

    Talking about putting the fox in charge of the henhouse.

  • 0

    redacted

    So North Korea was helping Syria (which refuses to sign int'l chem/bio/nuke disarmament treaties...) build a nuke facility capable of producing weapons grade material and the same IAEA guy who basically gave Iran a free pass in this endeavor denounces Israel's attack upon the rogue regime of Baby Assad?

    Why, it's almost like there is some kind of axis of evil out there, and it's comprised of Stalinist North Korea and totalitarian Mohammedan regimes in the mid East.

  • 0

    DXXJP

    AND WHAT ISREAL BOMBED THE PLACE AFTER GETTING OK'S FROM DUBYA AND CO. I saw the nifty little video with narrarations and graphs, reminiscent of oh 6 years ago. By the way where is the conclusive proof, from what I saw it was CG effects for the outer building and some camera pics of some building from the inside. I didnt see any distinct markings that it was in fact in Syria.

    When did the world decide israel or the US gets to decide who and who cant have a nuclear program. You all must think because the US has one someone responsible is at the button. PULEASE, I would like to see the US destroy a Russian site or even do a fly by on NK. Funny how some places are just off limits for the US and their whims.

  • 0

    Sarge

    "When did the world decide israel or the US gets to decide who and who cant have a nuclear program"

    LOL, why do some posters complain about the actions of those who make it possible for those posters to have the jobs they have? LOL...

  • 0

    DXXJP

    LOL sarge without the US we would all be living like communists. And the US has NEVER made it possible for me to have my job, dream on.

    Moderator: Back on topic please.

  • 0

    Sarge

    "They have never ever complained to us about anything"

    That's why Syria was this close to having a secret nuclear reactor.

    DXXJP - Dream on.

  • 0

    SuperLib

    I didnt see any distinct markings that it was in fact in Syria.

    Well I'm guessing more knowledgeable people than you and me will be reviewing the evidence. I'm also guessing that if the building isn't in Syria then the Syrians might add that to their defense.

    But I'm just speculating about the above.

  • 0

    DXXJP

    Oh yes sarge Im dreaming like you and your secret high level intel YOU DONT HAVE. The Same secret high level intel that got us in Iraq right.

  • 0

    adaydream

    Remember WMD, dual use vehicles.

    Same thing here.

    Photoshop.

  • 0

    SuperLib

    Saying, "I don't like the accuser and I like the accused" isn't evidence.

Login to leave a comment

OR

Follow us

More in World

View all

View all