If U.S. has new approach, Iran will respond: Ahmadinejad
WASHINGTON —
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said in an interview aired on U.S. television Monday that if the United States adopted a genuinely new approach to his country Tehran would respond in a positive way.
“Today, we see new behavior shown by the United States and the officials of the United States. My question is, is such behavior rooted in a new approach?” the president told NBC in a rare interview with a U.S. broadcaster.
“In other words, mutual respect, cooperation and justice? Or is this approach a continuation in the confrontation with the Iranian people, but in a new guise?” he said from Tehran, speaking through an interpreter.
If U.S. behavior represented a genuine change, “we will be facing a new situation and the response by the Iranian people will be a positive one,” Ahmadinejad said in an excerpt of the interview, conducted in the presidential compound.
Ahmadinejad’s comments, which will be aired in full later Monday, came after the United States took the unprecedented step of sending a top diplomat to meet Iran’s chief negotiator at talks in Geneva over Tehran’s disputed nuclear program.
Ahmadinejad announced Saturday that Iran had boosted the number of uranium-enriching centrifuges to 6,000, in an expansion of its nuclear drive that defies international calls for a freeze.
Iran faces three sets of U.N. Security Council sanctions over its refusal to halt uranium enrichment, which makes nuclear fuel as well as the fissile core of an atomic bomb.
Ahmadinejad reiterated in the interview that Tehran did not intend to build nuclear weapons, according to a partial transcript.
“We are not working to manufacture a bomb. We don’t believe in a nuclear bomb,” he said when asked if Iran sought to be a nuclear power.
History has shown that possessing nuclear weapons did not help other countries with their political goals, he added.
“Nuclear bombs belong to the 20th century. We are living in a new century.”
However, the White House remained skeptical of Ahmadinejad’s conciliatory tone.
“I think we have to approach this with a big grain of salt. President Ahmadinejad said one thing to the Iranian people on Saturday and another thing to an American journalist on Monday,” spokeswoman Dana Perino said.
“So I think that all of us need to consider this with a healthy dose of skepticism.”
World powers, concerned Tehran is pursuing a clandestine nuclear weapons project, have offered to start pre-negotiations during which Tehran would face no further sanctions if it added no more uranium-enriching centrifuges.
Permanent Security Council members—Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States—plus Germany have made Iran an offer, which includes trade incentives and help with a civilian nuclear program in return for suspending enrichment.
Iran was given a two-week deadline to respond that expires on Saturday.
When asked about the proposal from Western powers that offers improved trade terms and other incentives, Ahmadinejad said Iran was a “mighty country” and not at all isolated.
“For the continuation of our lives and for progress, we do not need the services, if I can use the word, of a few countries,” he said.
The United States has warned Tehran of “punitive measures” if it spurns the offer and presses on with enrichment.
Meanwhile on Monday, Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak met in Washington with U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates for talks that an Israeli adviser said would focus on the threat posed by Iran’s nuclear program.
Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman confirmed that the talks took place for about an hour and described them as “part of standard defense consultations.”
Despite Ahmadinejad’s relatively moderate words, the State Department said it was looking out for a clear, official statement of policy ahead of Saturday’s deadline.
“We are waiting what we believe to be a definitive statement from the government of Iran, we are looking for it to come through the traditional channel,” State Department spokesman Gonzalo Gallegos said.
“And then, it will be reviewed and then, we will decide where we will be going from there,” he told reporters.
Wire reports








Order by Time Order by Popularity
13 Comments
Login to comment
0
FairandBalanced
Hey Iran, there wont be any change of policy.
McCain will carry on the fine job started by GW. Iran shall be kept in check, by the knowledge that we can wipe them off the map, and send them back to te stone age. Hahahaha.
It is wonderfull being the good guys, when you are the 1 and only super power.
0
reddragonguy
If Iran made a 30% cut of each barrel of oil's price, sure the Bush administration will visiting Tehran for a new approach!
0
adaydream
We don't get any oil from Iran. Iran only deals with countries that use the euro.
Yeah, John McCain is going to carry on with the same policy as george bush. I can see how george bush's policy toward Iran has been a real success. < :-)
0
Surge
adaydream; McCain will continue the successfull policies of Bush.In other words a fantastic success.
Way to go McCain!!!
0
adaydream
Keep watching FoxNews surge. < :-)
0
Surge
adaydream, hope you`ll watch it too. Great stuff.
0
Helter_Skelter
This isn't a confrontation with the people of Iran. It's a confrontation with the homophobic, misogynist, anti-Semitic, holocaust-denying , terrorism-exporting, fundamentalist Islamic leadership of Iran that threatens to wipe countries off the map while possessing all the tools necessary to make nuclear weapons.
0
Madverts
Skelter,
"homophobic, misogynist, anti-Semitic, holocaust-denying , terrorism-exporting, fundamentalist Islamic leadership of Iran that threatens to wipe countries off the map"
Take a breath buddy, you're sounding like a fundie...
0
skipthesong
I am sure Amadinnerjacket's words will be accepted by American haters, however I would really like to believe the guy. But, then he got me:
"“Nuclear bombs belong to the 20th century. We are living in a new century.”! Well, how about having a country NOT run by religious laws and laws that were created x00 years ago? How about not having a fanatical government circle that places fatwas and still considers stoning a form of punishment? How about reaching out to Sunnis instead of having an 800 year old grudge? And how about giving Holocaust survivors their due place in history and leave that little tiny sand box alone.
0
adaydream
Helter_Skelter - possessing all the tools necessary to make nuclear weapons. Every country that has nuclear power has what is takes to make nukes. Are we going to take out or put sanctions on every country that wants nuclear power or is there a test for who is allowed to have nuclear power.?
http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf01.html
Who is going to be the tester who will decide who can have nuke power? < :-)
0
Surge
US should make it an urgent priority to ensure only we can posess nukes.
Even if it costs us Billions of Dollars, we should pay other countries to rid themselves of nukes, while they also enjoy financial benefits to reshape their societies into the US model.
We are the only country mature enough to have nukes, and the world trusts our judgement. Sorry Iran, you can`t have these weapons, you are unstable.
0
Helter_Skelter
Good point. How about we start with no Islamic nations are allowed to have nuclear technology and go from there.
homophobic, misogynist, anti-Semitic, (breath) holocaust-denying , terrorism-exporting, (breath) fundamentalist Islamic (breath) leadership of Iran that threatens (breath) to wipe countries off the map. Ah yes, good call, much better.
Back to top