Israeli PM, Obama have different views on Palestinian state
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
JAPAN NEWS AND DISCUSSION
-
U.N. observers warn of Syria civil war after massacre
( 7 )
-
Obama on the defensive over spending, debt
( 18 )
-
Egypt's top candidates try to broaden support
( 1 )
-
Queen marks diamond jubilee riding wave of popularity
( 0 )
-
Thousands take part in 'Slut Walks' in Brazil
( 10 )
-
- Business Teaching Positions - Part-time - Kanto Region
- Interac, Tokyo
- Salary: ¥3,000 ~ ¥5,000 / Hour
-
- National Relief/Substitute Teacher - summer start
- Interac, Tokyo
- Salary: ¥275,000 ~ ¥300,000 / Month
-
- 営業パーソン
- 加治金属工業株式会社, Tochigi
- Salary: ¥240,000 ~ ¥350,000 / Month Negotiable
Order by Time Order by Popularity
20 Comments
Login to comment
0
likeitis
Well. Surprise surprise!
0
moderateguy09
Obama , the great appeaser whom is well loved by the Hamas terrorist organisation is a traitor to our great ally Israel.
Wonder how those Obama voters feel now, knowing he does not give full 100% support at all times to our great allies in ther never ending fight against terror.
0
sabiwabi
Ally? With an ally like that, America does not need any enemies.
This video gives a good idea who in the US is pushing for war with Iran: http://www.rys2sense.com/anti-neocons/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=18652
If Obama was truly interested in America's interest, he would back Iran and attempt to disarm Israel.
0
skipthesong
Why should Israel roll over and help create a state with a bunch of people who refused them to create one of their own and still refuses to let them?
If Obama was truly interested in America's interest, he would back Iran and attempt to disarm Israel." At least in Israel you are allowed to be left leaning.
0
WilliB
Gee, what a surprise! Obama wants Israel to accept the suicial conditions that come with the Saudi-sponsored muslim-Arab "peace" plan, while Israel wants a guarantee that its right to exist is guaranteed.
That wasn´t too hard to predict, now.
0
SushiSake3
Every other U.S. president has failed to usher in enduring peace in the ME. moderateguy09 makes it clear he wants Obama to fail.
0
skipthesong
Every other U.S. president has failed to usher in enduring peace in the ME." Why is it up to a US president?
0
teleprompter
Who created Israel? It wasn't the US.
0
sabiwabi
Who financed (and continues to do so) and protects it?
0
LostinNagoya
At least they´re talking. A Palestinian state would bring balance to the region, Arabs would feel less humiliated by the two ¨best-friends¨ and peace would eventually with Arabs raising from their forced poverty.
0
teleprompter
We do, in part. And we finance and protect Mohammedan nations like Egypt as well.
Although, in Israel's case we get plenty back - in the form of medical advances, military hardware, top notch research in a wide variety of fields, and invaluable counter-insurgency advice.
You know, progress.
Americans like that kinda stuff.
0
adaydream
So Israel will agree to the Palestinian state if the US takes out Iran or the US takes the nuclear sites out.
Maybe if Iran is taken out, then Israel will be friends with Palestine, that redicules.
Palestine is a totally separate thing then Iran. But Israel says they won't consider recognizing a Palestine state unless Iran is taken out. That's basically what they are saying.
Ignorant. < :-)
0
Noliving
sabiwabai: Why should the US back Iran? What's in it for the US? If anything I say that if obama was working for the US interests he would disarm both countries. Just so you know Israel has been requesting less and less aid over the years, and like one poster pointed out the US gets a lot of technological and scientific advances in return from Israel. The US gives billions of dollars in aid to countries like egypt and pakistan, in fact for the past several years the US has been giving pakistan just as much aid as it does Israel.
0
Noliving
adaydream: They find Iran to be the more pressing issue then a palestinian state when it comes to the survival of Israel for them.
0
SuperLib
If we don't do it, who will? Europe?
(I almost said that with a straight face.)
0
adaydream
When Israel got their nuclear weapons they raised the bar for countries to protect themselves. I'm sure that Iran feels as safe as Russia did when we first acquired and used an atomic weapon. The world knows what they can do, so when one country gets a nuclear weapon another country feels threatened.
Israel sits there with nuclear weapons and cries because other countries want to equal the odds in case of war.
Israel cries and cries and the world bows down to them like they are something special. They aren't special, they are terrorist. < :-)
0
WilliB
sabiwabi:
And who threatens it so it needs protection? Who calls it a "dirty bacteria" which needs to be "wiped off the map"?
0
WilliB
adaydream:
When Israel got their nuclear weapon, it was surrounded by hostile regimes who want to drive the Jews into the sea. As it still is. Iran faces no such threat. In addition, when Israel got their nuclear weapon, it did so without having ever signed the NPT, and violating it in order to get its nuclear technology. As Iran did, and still does (remember, despite all the centrifuges, enrichment, and NK missiles, Iran still claims all this is for "peaceful purposes").
0
Helter_Skelter
Forced poverty? By whom? The Arabs haven't produce anything for the last five hundred years. Arab countries have always been home to some of the worst poverty in the world, even with their oil wealth. If you're looking for blame, blame the Arabs. It's hard to believe people actually believe if the "Palestinians" (i.e. Muslim Arabs) get a state, it's going to solve their poverty and misery. Try again.
0
Helter_Skelter
sabi, keeping this in context, you also believe it would have been in America's interest to back the Third Reich.
Back to top