Israeli PM Olmert to resign after September party vote
JERUSALEM —
Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, dogged by corruption probes, said on Wednesday he will step down mid-September in a surprise move that casts a long shadow over Middle East peacemaking efforts.
“After the election of my successor I will step down to allow a government to be formed rapidly,” Olmert said after declaring he would not run in September’s election for leadership of his centrist Kadima party.
His announcement marks the apex of a political storm unleashed when police launched a probe in May over suspicions he had accepted vast sums of money from U.S. financier Morris Talansky to fund elections campaigns and a lavish lifestyle in the 13 years before he became premier in 2006.
“I have made mistakes and I regret it,” said the 62-year-old Olmert, who has faced a chorus of calls for his resignation over the corruption allegations.
“I will quit my duties in an honorable, just and responsible manner, as I have acted throughout my mandate,” he said in a televised announcement from his official residence in Jerusalem. “I will then prove my innocence.”
He stressed he will “happily accept the outcome” of the Kadima primary, which the Israeli media said would be held on Sept 17.
A senior Israeli official said Olmert spoke to his friend and key ally U.S. President George W Bush, who helped relaunch the talks with the Palestinians in November, before making his decision public.
“We are going to look forward to working with all responsible Israeli leaders in the government, whether it is this government or future governments,” U.S. State Department spokesman Sean McCormack said.
Defense Minister Ehud Barak, whose Labour party is Kadima’s key partner in the government coalition welcomed Olmert’s announcement. “Prime Minister Ehud Olmert’s decision was appropriate and correct,” an aide quoted Barak as saying.
Last month Barak pushed Olmert to schedule an unprecedented party primary by threatening to support a bill to dissolve parliament.
Once the prime minister steps down, President Shimon Peres should designate the MP best placed to form a parliamentary majority. Under Israeli law, the designated MP would have up to 42 days to form a government, during which time Olmert would head a transitional administration.
Olmert has admitted he had accepted money from Talansky but has denied any wrongdoing.
State Prosecutor Moshe Lador said last week he would decide whether to indict Olmert over the Talansky affair “very soon.”
Talansky said in his May testimony he had given Olmert cash-stuffed envelopes on multiple occasions to cover expenses for his stays in the United States and pay for his election campaigns as Jerusalem mayor and Likud MP.
In a fierce cross-examination this month Olmert’s lawyers uncovered several contradictions in Talansky’s testimony but the 75-year-old Jewish-American financier insisted his overall story was accurate.
The latest investigation led to a chorus of calls for the resignation of Olmert, who is currently facing a total of six corruption probes.
Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni is widely viewed as a front-runner in the party election, but Transport Minister Shaul Mofaz and Public Security Minister Avi Dichter are also expected to compete.
Olmert’s departure could further affect already slow-moving US-backed peace talks with the Palestinians relaunched in November with the goal of resolving the decades-old conflict by the end of the year.
Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas’s spokesman insisted the Palestinians would continue to work with Israel regardless of who succeeds Olmert.
“This is an internal Israeli matter,” Nabil Abu Rudeina said by telephone from Tunis. “What matters to the Palestinian Authority is that there is an Israeli head of state that adheres to the peace process.”
Olmert’s departure could also derail indirect talks with neighboring Syria relaunched in May under Turkish mediation after an eight-year freeze.
Olmert took over as prime minister from Ariel Sharon in January 2006 after his mentor fell into a deep coma. He then led Kadima to victory in parliamentary elections in March that year.
His government was plunged into turmoil that summer when Israel fought Lebanon’s Hezbollah militia to a bloody 34-day stalemate widely viewed as a failure in Israel.
The war led to mounting calls for Olmert to resign, but the premier endured even when his approval ratings hit single-digit record lows.
Wire reports






Order by Time Order by Popularity
58 Comments
Login to comment
0
LIBERTAS
Why wait? Go now!
0
sabiwabi
I can't say that I'll miss him, but I hope to see him in The Hague (ICC), the sooner the better.
0
bebert
Stole money from a holocaust fund, how amusing is that.
0
WilliB
This has to be good news to anyone with any concern for Israel`s existance. GOOD RIDDANCE!
0
Helter_Skelter
Yeah, he should be tried for not completing the job in Lebanon. Israel needs a strong leader, not a wuss like Olmert.
0
adaydream
Yep, he got his check, too. < :-)
0
SushiSake3
Breakdown of ME peace talks - Another huge achievement for President Bush to add to his legacy....
Go Bush!!!! You're going to go out with one heckkuva legacy!
0
kinniku
I doubt there are many that will miss him. However, he has not done anything that warrants a trip to the Hague, as much as you claim otherwise. The criteria for someone being tried in the Hague is quite clear and as horrible a PM as Olmert has been, he does not fit in the criteria.
0
sabiwabi
kinniku, I would have been very surprised for you to say otherwise. Again, your input is greatly appreciated!
0
kinniku
sabiwabi,
Again, thank you too. However, I would be curious to know how you specifically feel Mr. Olmert fits into the criteria for a trial at the Hague. I assume you have some specific reasons for feeling this way. It certainly wouldn't be just because the man is the prime minister of Israel, right? After all, that alone certainly would not be within the criteria (which is very specific).
0
kinniku
bebert,
Where does it say that? According to the article and other reports, the money was taken from campaign funds.
0
sabiwabi
No, of course it isn't. But if you truly are not aware of the crimes against humanity this man is responsible for, I suggest you look into it. They are quite horrible and obvious crimes, I'm sure you're aware of them and you're just pretending to ignore them, right?
0
netvistafire
Olmert is a war criminal. He should be sent to the Hague for mass murder of innocent civilians, invading a soverign nation and ethnic cleansing.
0
kinniku
sabiwabi,
You did not answer the question. My question to you was under what specific criteria could Mr. Olmert be charged in the Hague? Either you have a specific answer or you don't. It seems you don't.
0
kinniku
netvistafire,
Again, the criteria is very specific for a trial at the Hague. When exactly did Mr. Olmert mass murder innocent people? Where specifically did you see ethnic cleansing?
Was Mr. Olmert completely wrong for entering a war with Hezbollah and dragging Lebanon in with it? Yes, he was. Is this equal to a crime against humanity that can be tried at the Hague? Please convince me.
0
sabiwabi
Oh my!
0
netvistafire
Ethnic cleansing, home demolitions, land seizure, racism, murder and terror is what Israel and Olmert stands for. I wonder if Olmert has a concience and if Israel supporters too have a concience. Officially refered to as 'transfer' by Israel, it is the systematic process of expelling Palestinians from so-called Greater Israel across the river Jordan. Because, in Israel's words there already exists a Palestinian state: 'Jordan is Palestine'. This has always been Israel's official policies. It started in 1948 and the project is still on going.
0
kinniku
Thank you for your valuable input!
However, I would think it rather ironic for someone who claims that Hitler did not treat the "Jews" to badly (Your words, remember. Oh my!) to be up in arms about Olmert and yet not have managed to think things through enough to kindly back up your statement with some specifics about how Mr. Olmert (the man) fits the criteria for being put on trial in the Hague. You really do seem to be short on information and specifics lately. However, you do seem to make up for it in terms of empty suppositions.
Personally, I do not like Olmert, never have. I think I was a horrible PM and I think Israel is the worse off for him, not to mention the Lebanese and Palestinians. That does not, and I repeat myself here, mean that he neccessarily fits the critirea for a trial at the Hague. Unless you can manage to specifically speak to this, it tells me that, yet again, you are talking typing anything that comes to mind and that it does not neccessarily have true links to reality.
0
kinniku
netvistafire (or should I call you "nom du jour"?),
You have not addressed Olmert specifically. If you were to say the man deserves to have been thrown out of office years ago, I would agree. If you were to say he was and is a terrible prime minister, in fact, the worst Israel and many countries for that matter have every seen, I would agree. However, you seem to be asserting that Olmert is responsible for everything that has happened since 1948, which in your mind is completely Israel's fault to begin with. Again, I will politely ask you before you change names again and the conversation ends; What are the specifics to Olmert the man himself that lead you to believe he fits the criteria to be on trial at the Hague?
0
kinniku
Obviously, I meant I think he was a horrible PM. I am not a prime minister ;-)
0
netvistafire
The massacre carried out by Israel of Palestinian families in Beit Hanoun should be more than of a reason for why Olmert should be charged for crimes in Hague. The Hague has btw. declared the aparthed wall illeagal so Olmert has already broken international law by continuing with the building of the illeagal wall.
0
Helter_Skelter
kinniku,
Since sabiwabi won't give you specific reasons why Olmert should be tried in the Hague for crimes against humanity, I will. Here are a few:
Endangering the lives of Israelis by allowing them to be bombarded by Qassam rockets from Gaza on a nearly daily basis while providing no serious response to terrorist groups like Hamas and Islamic Jihad who launch them.
Endangering the lives of Israelis by allowing thousands of rockets to be launched from Lebanon and then ending the war prematurely against the terrorist group Hezbollah before they were eradicated from the southern region of the country.
Endangering the lives of Israelis by confusing peace with hudna, believing in land for peace, and thinking that the Muslim Arabs seek anything other than to ethnically cleanse the ME of Jews.
Endangering the lives of Israelis by allowing the terrorist-exporting regime of Iran to continue developing its nuclear weapons program, which is an existential threat to your country, while demonstrating little urgency in preventing a potential nuclear holocaust.
I could go on. Sabiwabi, let me know if you'd like me to post more reasons for you.
0
kinniku
netvistafire,
This article is about Olmert, so that is the only part of your post I will discuss. The rest of your post does not meet this criteria and so I have no need to address it. I will say that your view of history is interesting. I hadn't realized Sharon "stepped down". Maybe "stepped down" is a new word for "coma"? Anyway, why don't you explain how the tragic killing of 19 Palestinians, for which Israel apologized, meets the criteria for the Hague? I am not defending Olmert. Helter Skelter has given quite a few very good reasons why Olmert has been a terrible prime minister. However, I don't remember South Africa apologizing for apartheid. Israel and Olmert personally did apologize for those killing immediately after the fact and expressed regret.
The fact is you still have not given specifics to support your case.
0
kinniku
Helter Skelter,
Thank you for your response. You have certainly pointed out some of the many reasons why Olmert has been horrible from the very beginning. However, I disagree with some of your points. I do believe peace between the Israelis and Palestinians is possible. The problem with Olmert is that he has done everything half-cocked and he has essentially been ineffective. The man had no base to begin with and went immediately down hill from there.
He will not be missed.
0
JackBerstein
kinniku, Please make an honest effort to inform yourself before asking others to prove the obvious. Olmert deserves to be tried at the Hague. To not understand why is to be out of touch with ME issues.
0
Helter_Skelter
kinniku,
If the Israeli/Palestinian conflict were unique, I'd have more hope. But this really should be called the Infidel/Muslim conflict, and it's not unique. It's being played out all over the world and has been going on for centuries. I too would like peace but I'm not going to be fooled into believing a Palestinian state or giving up land or signing peace treaties with Muslim Arabs is going to bring it. Only superior strength and resolution will possibly bring peace, not capitulation and appeasement. Oh yeah, "nom du jour" :-D
0
sabiwabi
No, the Palestinian Christians were also kicked out of their land by the Zionists, and continue to be mistreated today. The Muslims are not the problem.
0
kinniku
JackBerstein,
Thank you for that fact-filled post. However, don't you think it is reasonable to ask others for information? Is that also not an honest effort to inform myself? While you were typing you could have noted what specifically you feel qualifies Olmert for a trial at the Hague. However, I see you don't seem to have informed yourself enough to provide that answer.
0
kinniku
Helter Skelter,
One thing is for sure, there are not many circles that Olmert can find popularity in. Right here we have a huge range of ideas, including some fantastic jumps in logic. However, we all agree Olmert should go. That really does say something.
As far as peace between the Palestinians and Israelis, I think the biggest stumbling blocks are the extremists on both sides. It really is a shame Arafat couldn't bring himself to keep talking to Barak and made a deal for peace before he died. Although he wore a kaffieh, he was not a religious extremist. I never thought Olmert was the man to bring peace to Israelis and Palestinians. Hopefully his replacement can do a better job and hopefully he will have a serious negotiating partner on the Palestinian side.
0
kinniku
sabiwabi,
No, they are not. However, Hamas' positions up to now have certainly not created an atmosphere where the peace process would be allowed to start, nevermind move forward.
While you were typing it would have been nice for you to spend a moment and inform us specifically of which criteria you feel Olmert fits into that you think qualifies him for trial at the Hague. Get back to us what you have had a chance to collect your thoughts.
0
Helter_Skelter
Kinniku,
With all respect, yes they are. Again, the Muslim conflict with Israel is the same conflict with India is the same with....etc. Even if you argue this is only a small group of radicalized Muslims, it's a Muslim phenomenon nonetheless. War against the Infidel is an integral part of the Koran. I get no pleasure making statements like this but for you believe that Muslims are not the problem is ignoring events that are occurring not only in Israel, but around the world.
Where are you going to find a negotiating partner when Hamas, who's charter calls for the destruction of the Israel, is voted into power by a majority of Palestinians?
Sabiwabi,
There's no more striking example of an exodus of Christians than from the Palestinian town of Bethlehem. This town used to have a majority of Christians but they are now only a small minority, despite its religious significance. It's unfortunate the exodus of Jews and Christians from Muslim lands is so under-reported.
0
netvistafire
I am suprised you haven't heard the news or perhaps you are pretending not to have?Sharon was forced to step down as a Defense Minister after the invasion of 1982. An official Israeli commission of inquiry -- chaired by Yitzhak Kahan, president of Israel's Supreme Court -- investigated the massacre, and in February 1983 publicly released its findings. The Kahan Commission found that Ariel Sharon, among other Israelis, had responsibility for the massacre,
** Anyway, why don't you explain how the tragic killing of 19 Palestinians, for which Israel apologized, meets the criteria for the Hague? **
If he did apologize then he has admited that he is responsible for a crime. You do not need to be a lawyer to figure that much. Besides under the Fourth Geneva Convention Palestinians are protected people and Israel as an occupier has leagal responsibility to abide scrupulously by its legal obligations and its responsibilities under the Fourth Geneva Convention to the Protection of Palestinians. Palestinian rights are sacred under international law. Olmert is breaking international law and even if he apologized for the massaacre he still is breaking international law. The Fourth Geneva Convention applies to the West Bank, Gaza and Jerusalem.
I would distance myself from any sort of oppression and racial segregation and not be a supporter of one.
0
netvistafire
You could not be further away from the truth. Christian Palestinians and Muslim Palestinians are being equally discriminated and Israel has ruined both the Muslim and Christian cultures of Palestine. Both religious leaders be it Christians or Muslims do not support the Zionist entity. Before the creation of Israel there was no conflict between Christians and Muslims and Jews for that matter in Palestine. The exodus of Palestinians is due to Israel making life as miserable as possible for the Palestinians so that they will have no choice but to leave. Israel, after all, is a country that is based on mass murder, mass theft and mass mendacity, characters that most people wouldn’t find particularly appealing.
0
rajakumar
I think Livni will be PM. Good ,fast changes in Israel, is good.
0
netvistafire
Hamas always wants a cese fire and a calm besides Hamas stance is according to UN resolutions and international law. Israel retreats to 1967 borders and Palestine makes a state of West Bank, East Jerusalem and Gaza. It is not Hamas who are breaking the laws it is Israel. Hamas will not judge people’s religions and ideologies unlike Israel and they seek friendship on the basis of mutual respect and mutual interests. Hamas doesn’t actually consider Jews as enemies. Jews who support justice and true peace and who stand against oppression and occupation are Hamas’ partners for a better future for both Jews and Muslims.
0
kinniku
rajakumar,
She certainly would be much better than Olmert. That is for sure!
0
kinniku
I support a two state solution that provides for both a Palestinian and Israeli state. Not for a few years as Hamas seems to indicate, but forever.
0
kinniku
Helter_Skelter,
Well, the present situation which has been made much worse by Olmert's lack of true leadership has tipped the power scale squarely in Hamas' hands. However, Palestinians traditionally do not have a history of religious fanaticism. I think Hamas won over the people of Gaza because of the charity work in the area and not because of a sudden religious change in the Palestinian population. However, I would agree there has been a dangerous shift in recent years that will make making and keeping a negotiating partner extremely difficult now. As I said, it is a shame Arafat did not take the chance he was given with Barak. Things would be a lot different and better for the Palestinians and Israelis if he did.
Olmert was never strong enough to make any sort of deal anyway.
0
kinniku
netvistafire,
I chose to ignore him because his name is not Olmert. Can't you understand this is off-topic?
Again, what part of the convention did Olmert break? When? Where?
The court at the Hague did note in 2004 that the wall was contrary to international law (the court's words, not mine). However, it did not rule that this was a war crime. It also did not rule that Olmert was responsible for it.
For example? Specifics? When? Where? Who?
Hamas and other factions in Gaza have been lobbing rockets into Israel. That is not abiding by international law. If Hamas would like liberty and freedom, they should recognize Israel's right to exist and show a serious willingness to negotiate. Recently, I have seen some moves in this direction on the part of Hamas. They arrested some militants responsible for attacks on Israel recently. These are good developments. Hopefully, the next prime minister in Israel can make use of this positive direction to make a lasting peace for all concerned.
0
kinniku
This is incorrect. There were riots and killings amongst these groups against each other before Israel was established.
0
netvistafire
I see. You "chose" to ingore a massacre in that scale and came with your cute remark about "coma"
We already talked about this earlier in the thread. Then you said but he apologized then I said it still is a crime. Will you choose to ignore this just as you chose to ignore Sharon?
Palestine is under seige. Lift the criminal seige and give liberty, freedom and stop the oppression of the Palestinians. Israel has been targeted by 65 UN resolutions. Palestinians 0. It is not the Palestinians who are breaking international law.
If it is not the leader of a country who is reponsible for the illegal apartheid wall then who is? The workers? Doubtful. If you break a law then it becomes a crime. By breaking international law it becomes a crime even if it is committed by Israel.
0
USAPatriot
Helter Skelter
Great post, very interesting information there. People should understand the Muslims attitudes to Israel before supporting them.
Olmert may not be perfect, but he is definitley one of the good guys.
0
kinniku
No, in your now-removed remarks, you referred to Sharon stepping down in a sentence about Gaza. You did not write what he stepped down from. So, assuming at the time (incorrectly it seems) that you were on topic about Olmert, I thought you were talking about when Olmert took over. Where are not talking about 1982, never have been. This article is not about 1982.
Again, Sharon in 1982 has nothing to do with this discussion. We are supposed to be talking about Olmert. Israel and Olmert claim what happened was an accident. Do you have specific reason to believe that this incident was not an accident and that the apologies by Olmert and the govenment of Israel are somehow false? If not, you cannot proof the crime you are claiming that Olmert should be tried for in the Hague.
Do you feel Palestine was under less or more 'seige' 20 years ago? Were there armed, officially recognized Palestinian military, police and government officials 20 years ago? Since the early 90's Palestinians have been given back (of course it is not enough, nor is it quick enough) land and they have also been officially armed. Israel even withdrew from Gaza. However, you are mistaken. The Palestinians have also broken international laws. Digging tunnels into Egypt and shooting rockets are also against international laws.
Unless you are a member of the Hague (doubtful) it might be better to use the Hague's judgements in your statements. Your personal feelings do not affect international law not matter how much you claim otherwise. The court at the Hague did note in 2004 that the wall was contrary to international law (the court's words, not mine). However, it did not rule that this was a war crime. It also did not rule that Olmert was responsible for it. This is what the Hague said. If you have a problem with it, take it up with the Hague, not with me.
0
Helter_Skelter
netvistafire,
Hamas is an internationally recognized Islamic terrorist group, best known for its use of suicide bombers, and who's charter seeks the destruction of Israel. That's really all we need to know about Hamas.
0
LIBERTAS
Considering Olmert started a war of aggression, that by itself makes him a war criminal. But, he has a long tradition of genocide to uphold. http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/palestinians.html?q=palestinians.html
0
USAPatriot
LIBERTAS; Hey, Israel is on the side of the good guys. He`s had to make hard decisions to protect his people from constant attacks by the evil doers. Hopefully a strong candidate similar to Sharon can take his place.
0
sabiwabi
I assume you are referring to the riots between the Jews and non-Jews immediately before Israel was recognized during the large influx of European Jews. You are splitting hairs again.
What he/she probably meant was that the Christians and Muslims and Jews all got along fine for centuries before the Zionists set out to take over the land.
0
kinniku
sabiwabi,
You assumed incorrectly. What I wrote is correct not only just before Israel was created but for quite some time beforehand. You often claim to have all the true, yet I am constantly amazed by you lack of specific knowledge of events. Do you need me to point you in the direction of proof again? By the way, I see you have time to comment on this, but still have no time to back up you assertion that Olmert has specifically met criteria to be tried at the Hague. Why is it that you never seem to be able to provide specific proof? It seems you really don't believe what you write.
0
kinniku
LIBERTAS,
Sorry, you are incorrect. What started the horrible war in Lebanon was Hezbollah thinking Israel would not be willing to fight on two fronts, both Gaza and Lebanon. So, Hezbollah gambled with the lives of Lebanese citizens and decided to kill and capture Israeli soldiers. They did this even while being able to see how the results of a similar capture was reigning havok on Gaza.
0
sabiwabi
Or as George Galloway would say, for you the clock started ticking when those soldiers were taken. The whole thing started much earlier.
0
kinniku
Interesting attempt to change the subject. Hezbollah should not have crossed the border and captured those soldiers. In addition, they should not have been shooting rockets into Israel up to that point either.
Still waiting for your specific criteria. Funny how you have time to write this, but no time to back up your claims. Funny...but, not surprising.
Back to top