N Korea preparing to restart nuclear reactor
PANMUNJOM —
North Korea, accusing Washington of breaking a nuclear disarmament deal, said Friday it is working to restart its atomic reactor and no longer wants U.S. concessions promised under the pact.
“We are making thorough preparations to restore nuclear facilities,” said foreign ministry official Hyon Hak-Bong.
“You may say we have already started work to restore them to their original status,” he told reporters at the border truce village of Panmunjom before the start of talks between the two Koreas on energy aid.
The U.S. State Department confirmed North Korea was moving “closer and closer” to restarting the plutonium-producing plant, and urged the regime to pull back.
“They haven’t got to that point yet (of restarting) and we would urge them not to get to that point,” department spokesman Sean McCormack told reporters.
“They have a choice. They can go down the pathway of having different and better relationship with the world… or they can keep themselves isolated, move the process backward. So we’ll see,” McCormack said in Washington in reaction to the comments.
The foreign ministry in Pyongyang said separately that work has been under way “since some time ago” to restore the reactor in response to the U.S. failure to drop the North from a terrorism blacklist.
“Now that the U.S. true colors are brought to light, the DPRK (North Korea) neither wishes to be delisted as a ‘state sponsor of terrorism’ nor expects such a thing to happen,” a ministry spokesman told the official news agency. “It will go its own way.”
The energy talks went ahead Friday despite the deadlock in a six-nation aid-for-disarmament deal, which appeared to be making progress this summer.
The hardline communist state, which tested an atomic weapon in October 2006, began disabling its ageing reactor and other plants at Yongbyon last November under the pact with South Korea, the U.S., Japan, China and Russia.
But it announced last month it had halted work in protest at Washington’s refusal to drop it from the blacklist, as promised under the deal.
Washington says the North must first accept strict outside verification of a nuclear inventory which Pyongyang handed over in June.
Foreign ministry official Hyon said such demands for what he called “forceful inspections” are not part of the six-party deal.
Similar demands for a “robber-like inspection method” led to war in Iraq, he said in opening remarks at the Panmunjom talks, adding that the U.S. wants “to go anywhere at any time to collect samples and carry out examinations with measuring equipment.”
Hyon said the North had “perfectly and flawlessly” completed 90 percent of disablement work including the extraction of 4,740 spent fuel rods.
In return for disablement, negotiating partners promised the impoverished state one million tons of heavy fuel oil or equivalent energy aid.
Nearly half has so far been delivered and Hwang Joon-Kook, chief of the South Korean delegation, said the rest would be sent.
“We also want to make sure that the six-party process does not go backward,” Hwang said in his own opening remarks.
In Seoul, Foreign Minister Yu Myung-Hwan said it is unclear whether the North intends to turn the nuclear clock back “or whether it is another bargaining move.”
A senior South Korean foreign ministry official said Friday’s talks reached no agreement and the two sides failed to set a date for the next meeting.
He said Seoul’s delegation urged the North to take part in talks on verification methods. “We told them that there will be a problem in (delivering) energy aid if disablement is not done.”
In London, the International Institute for Strategic Studies said Thursday the North could put its nuclear program back on track in less than a year.
Uncertainty over the health of leader Kim Jong-Il means its nuclear stalemate with Washington is likely to continue, it added.
Kim, 66, failed to appear at a Sept 9 anniversary parade. South Korean officials said he underwent brain surgery following a stroke but is recovering well.
Hyon rejected the reports about Kim’s health as malicious.
“That’s sophism by evil people wanting to break up unity between the two Koreas,” he said.









Order by Time Order by Popularity
10 Comments
Login to comment
0
some14some
Resume 6-party autumn session.
0
goodDonkey
. . . and yet another Bush failure.
0
tclh
So be it ,that is why this world needs a team like McCain/Palin.
0
CavemanLawyer
When N.K. has the moral highground compared to my country, it is very sad day.
Can anyone think of a reason to keep N.K. on the terror list? Decades ago they earned their place, but I cannot think of anything lately. Even the United States and Britian have committed acts of terror in more recent memory.
I think the Bush administration just likes to make enemies. I think they enjoy war and conflict.
--Cirroc
0
OssanULTRA
Yes, NKorea hasn't agreed to a verification of hteir declarations. If they weren't lying they'd have no reason to object. NKorea has zero moral highground. And it's got nothing to do with Bush. They've been this way since 1950.
0
rajakumar
6 party talks/deals or other ways, which is better way.
Definitely 6 party deals/talks continuations for promotion of greater friendly ties and economic prosperity in north korea.
0
WilliB
Well, those direct talks that the left was pushing and finally got have backfired royally, haven´t they. So GW Bush finally does what the left wants, if blows up everybody´s face, and now what? Back to square one, after wasting even more ressources on the NK regime. Brilliant.
0
presto345
It's a damn shame millions of peace loving people who just want to go on with their lives need to continue to suffer under this rogue regime. Diplomacy is getting nowhere. Why is it NK objects so strongly to inspections? Because they are sneaky and want to keep some aces up their sleeves. What they are saying is that they can't be trusted.
0
CavemanLawyer
What part of "the U.S. government failed to keep its word" did you not understand???
--Cirroc
0
CavemanLawyer
Of terror? No, I think you must mean things related to nuclear power and weapons.
Not agreeing to verification is not an act of terror. Neither is possession of nuclear power plants. Not even possession of nukes. I can think of no reason to keep N.K. on that list except perhaps a heavy handed attempt at leverage. Or maybe its just spite?
I prefer my terror blacklist to have real terror states on it, not cobbled together with mere political games. I take terrorism seriously and don't want resources wasted on political sports.
--Cirroc
Back to top