NASA moon strikes finds significant water
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
( 2 )
( 2 )
( 3 )
( 21 )
( 11 )
Order by Time Order by Popularity
8 Comments
Login to comment
0
jinjapan
"if" america landed on the moon before, i find it very hard to believe that they didn't look for water then. seems as that would be the top priority .
0
PepinGalarga
there was no water detected in the prior landing areas, mostly rocks...
this find could be significant, as the moon has vas mineral resources other than water, however, i don't foresee any countries taking ownership of certain areas. I imagine that once this is imminent, countries will get together and do something similar to what's being done in Antartica.
The initial development cost will run into the trillions of dollars for sure, since they will have to depend on photovoltaics for the initial energy source. Also, hundreds of tons of machinery need to be transported to there. The Space Elevator makes more sense every day.
0
Pump24
"If" America landed on the moon? Is that what`s taught here in Japanese schools? You watched Capricorn One to many times, jinjapan...
0
eigonosensei
NASA moon strikes finds significant water.... but failed to destroy the reptilian stargate.
0
USNinJapan2
How desperate one must be...
0
nandakandamanda
The moon sounds like a big watermelon. Let's hope the water is not brackish...
0
Badsey
Solar cells: cheap. Getting to the moon: expensive. Moon water: Priceless.
Back to top