NATO chief says Pakistan terror sanctuaries not acceptable
KABUL —
The NATO chief called Thursday for Pakistan to be more involved in tackling extremist bases on its soil, as Afghanistan was hit by new attacks with at least 34 Taliban bodies found after one battle.
NATO was concerned by a spike in terror attacks but would not enter Pakistan to hunt down militants based there, the alliance’s Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer also told reporters in Kabul.
Scheffer was visiting amid high tension between Afghanistan and Pakistan over the violence, including the bombing of the Indian embassy here this month that Kabul has directly blamed on its neighbor’s intelligence agency.
“I cannot think of anyone who would consider it acceptable that many terrorists from all over the world gather in a certain area and create mischief and havoc there,” Scheffer told reporters, in a reference to militant bases in Pakistan.
“The bottom line is that the present situation cannot be acceptable for anyone,” Scheffer told reporters after talks with President Hamid Karzai.
Afghan and Western officials have long said that the Taliban and al-Qaida have been able to regroup in Pakistan’s semi-autonomous tribal areas after they were expelled from Afghanistan in 2001 in a U.S.-led invasion.
Some accuse Islamabad of not doing enough to tackle them and criticize its efforts to negotiate peace deals.
Karzai reiterated his call for the focus of the international effort against extremism to be focused on militant hideouts across the border.
“The fight against terrorism is not in Afghanistan and we will not be secure and safe unless we address the question of sanctuaries in Pakistan, the terrorist training camps there and the motivation that they are given there.”
Scheffer said Pakistan had to be part of the solution to the problem.
“Our forces in Afghanistan are also the victims of the surge and uptick in violent incidents we have seen recently. But let us practice a regional approach and let us involve all the regional actors here,” he said.
In new violence in Afghanistan Thursday, security forces were ambushed on the main road between Kabul and Kandahar and fought back in an hours-long battle.
“At least 34 enemy dead bodies are at the battlefield but we believe there are many more killed,” defense ministry spokesman Mohammed Zahir Azimi said.
The interior ministry said 70 militants were killed in the fighting in Shah Joy, which is about 200 kilometers from the southern city of Kandahar. Among the dead were two Arabs and four Chechens, it said.
The Afghan army was deployed on the key road this month after a surge in attacks along the route. Taliban have captured several Afghans traveling on the road and killed them, accusing them of working for the government and its allies.
In the central province of Ghazni meanwhile, a joint NATO-Afghan operation to take back Ajristan district had left 15 militants dead, a provincial government spokesman said.
A remote-controlled bomb destroyed a police vehicle in the eastern province of Paktia early Thursday, killing four policemen and wounding two others, said deputy provincial police chief Ghulam Dastageer Azad.
Taliban fighters also ambushed a police vehicle on patrol in the southwestern province of Farah overnight and killed three policemen another police official said.
The hardline Islamic Taliban were in government between 1996 and 2001 when they were driven out in a U.S.-led invasion.
Wire reports








Order by Time Order by Popularity
7 Comments
Login to comment
0
some14some
and Pakistan says foreign troops are not acceptable to them. It appears that for Bush friendship with Mush is far more important than attacking AQ/Taliban terror cells in and around Pakistan.
0
adaydream
So it's not only Barack telling Pakistan they can't have a terrorist haven.
Wonder if we can get our $Billions back? < :-)
0
LIBERTAS
Has anyone ever successfully invaded and held Afghanistan?
0
skipthesong
and Pakistan says foreign troops are not acceptable to them. It appears that for Bush friendship with Mush is far more important than attacking AQ/Taliban terror cells in and around Pakistan." I've said that a million times. But when I say we need to go in and get them, people on this board went off the handle. Now that Barrack is saying it, its welcomed.
Has anyone ever successfully invaded and held Afghanistan?" Invaded, yeah. Held it? why, there is nothing there unless you are a heroine junkie!
0
SezWho2
I don't think the Taliban are--or ever were--our problem, except to the extent that we accused it of providing safe haven for bin Laden and al Qaeda. After driving bin Laden out of areas which were Afghanistan's in name only into areas which are Pakistan's in name only, we have rather steadfastly refused to go after bin Laden. And even though the Taliban are just one of the factions that we are fighting in Afghanistan, we seem to lay all the problems at their doorstep.
Obama seems to have a tendency to view Afghanistan as the "good war". I think he is wrong about that. There wasn't any good war. Miscreants such as the ones who rammed planes into the towers are not a job for armies. They are a job for police and special ops.
0
adaydream
SezWho2 - The Taliban isn't a country. They are the political movement that took control of Afghanistan and with their and bin Laden's support atgtacked the United States.
I'm not one to advocate of wars or fighting, but this was a just retaliation for attacking us, killing our prople and for attacking our way of life.
Iraq was a war of choice. But Afghanistan actually attacked us.
The problem is we forgot about the war in Afghanistan and attacked a sovern country that did absolutely nothing to us except have oil. < :-)
0
SezWho2
adaydream,
I'm afraid I have to disagree with you, but then again, I'm not sure what you are saying. You say that the Taliban are not a country and yet you say that Afghanistan attacked us. I agree with the first but disagree with the second. Not only did Afghanistan not attack us, but the Taliban did not either.
Back to top