Pakistani Taliban targeted Danes because of cartoons: officials
ISLAMABAD —
Pakistani officials said Tuesday an attack on the Danish embassy was likely a one-off linked to cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed and will not impact the new government’s talks with the Taliban.
Investigators believe Taliban militants based in a tribal region on the Afghan border were responsible for Monday’s suicide attack, which killed at least six people including a Danish national, a government official said.
Police have found skull fragments at the scene which confirm that the bombing was a suicide attack, a tactic favored by Taliban rebels who have been blamed for a wave of blasts in Pakistan in the past year, officials said.
But the senior government official said on condition of anonymity: “It appears to be a one-off attack which has little relevance to the ongoing negotiations between Taliban and the authorities.”
Pakistani Taliban militants agreed to peace talks with the government after parties allied to U.S.-backed anti-terror ally President Pervez Musharraf were trounced in elections in February.
The United States, NATO and Afghanistan have all expressed doubts over the talks.
“This attack was not born out of the events in the country or the region, rather it was part of global outrage in the Islamic world against publishing blasphemous cartoons,” the official said.
Danish newspapers first published the controversial cartoons in 2005, sparking violent protests in Pakistan and other Muslim countries. Several dailies reprinted the sketches in February this year.
In Copenhagen, Denmark’s foreign minister Per Stig Moeller led a somber memorial to victims of the attack, observing a minute of silence with staff under a Danish red-and-white flag flying at half mast.
“The terror will be conquered. We will not give up,” Moeller was quoted as saying as the ceremony began. He insisted that Denmark was “not without friends. The world is showing us solidarity.”
One Danish citizen of Pakistani origin and two Pakistani employees were among the dead in the blast that badly damaged the embassy and the offices of a U.N.-backed aid agency, officials in Copenhagen said.
Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaida extremist network has made recent calls for attacks on Danish targets because of the cartoons.
A spokesman for Pakistan’s Taliban militants said on Monday that he had no information about the blast. He was not immediately available for comment on Tuesday.
The top Pakistani Taliban commander, Baitullah Mehsud, has denied any links to al-Qaida and accusations by the former government that he orchestrated the assassination of former premier Benazir Bhutto in December.
Security officials said a stolen car with fake diplomatic plates was used in the bombing.
The bomb contained at least 25 kilograms of the same type of explosive used in a suicide bombing at the Federal Investigation Agency’s offices in Lahore in March, which was blamed on the Taliban, they said.
The preparations for the Danish blast were “meticulous, similar to previous attacks by Taliban linked to al-Qaida” and involved a car stolen from the northwestern city of Peshawar, the security official said.
However the attack itself was “poorly executed” and the bomb went off several meters from the gate of the embassy, they said.
Security officials warned however that the attack showed the Taliban network remained intact and exposed the problems that lie ahead “in case of reopening of hostilities between the government and the militants.”
Wire reports








Order by Time Order by Popularity
17 Comments
Login to comment
0
OssanULTRA
They killed people over cartoons. The Japanese Anime industry should make note of this.
0
some14some
While reaching the 'deal' with Pakistani Govt, Taliban has clearly said it will continue to attack 'foreigners' as such cartoon publication is mere excuse.
0
meija
They want to kill anyone who isn't them. Any excuse will do. Race or religion isn't important to them. Just look at Iraq where they target "fellow muslims". They are condemned by the teachings of their own religion as murderers. No "peace talks" with them will succeed unless you offer complete surrender to them, which is unacceptable.
0
skipthesong
Does anyone know that if the guys doing the actual killings have seen the cartoons themselves or if they were just ordered? I am very curious.
0
adaydream
You mean that these chumps are still acting up because of cartoons. They don't want to make friendly.
Maybe another $10Billion would help. < :-)
0
Zaphod
Skipthesong:
There are hardly many subscribers to Danish newspapers in Pakistan, and you won`t see any in the local press. A call at the local mosque to kill the unbelievers should suffice quite nicely.
0
skipthesong
zaphod: that's my point. How can you be angry at something that is said to be discriminatory against you if you have not seen it or heard it yourself?
I know people talk behind my back, but I ain't gonna do anything about until I hear it from the horse's mouth.
This proves more my point where I said the leaders of these Mosques and their leaders need to do a lot more to step up and smooth things out.. I think it is safe to say that when I talk about Muslims and vulgar against their actions, I can blame the leaders.
0
Zaphod
Skipthesong:
Why should they "smooth things out"? They are preaching islam. Calls to hate and kill the unbelievers until they submit are entirely normal for them.
I don`t know why you expect a tiger to behave like a herbivore.
0
SuperLib
If the cartoons hadn't been published, then this attack wouldn't have happened. You can't deny that. Denmark is part of the Global War on Terror so this only proves Denmark's failures. Maybe Denmark should rethink what it's doing to innocents in Afghanistan. Denmark's support of Israel doesn't help. This attack will add to the increase in worldwide terrorism which shows that Denmark is actually part of the cause of the increase.
0
super delegate
Danish knights ok they like undoubtedly took part in teh Crusades. And that means all a there ancestors are guilty.
0
Zaphod
SuperLib:
Undoubtedly. And if Denmark adopted the Shariah, that would be even better. And that recipe works for all these pesky democratic countries. Why don`t don´t we all convert to islam right now and get it over with. Brilliant thinking!
0
presto345
Like Zaphod said: Brilliant reasoning. The fre@ks would have found a different target for a different reason.
0
SuperLib
I didn't say the Danes deserved to be killed, I'm just saying I'm not entirely comfortable with a discussion about the situation without at least some, if not all all, attention given to what the Danes might have done to bring this on themselves.
I mean, obviously I'm against terrorism. That goes without saying.
0
presto345
Come on man. They exercised their hard earned freedom of opinion and press on their own territory with in mind they didn't need to bow to a bigoted middle ages inquisition style of censorship from another fundamentalist, human rights limiting clique far away, but trying to expand their sphere of influence.
0
Jyan_Bon
I am all for "Freedom of Speech/expression", but some kind of insult on others' religion is not considered as a "nice thing to do ".
0
SuperLib
Don't worry, presto. I'm just making a point. I find it odd that since Denmark is the target the JT "progressives" refuse to show their faces (and there arguments) here. You can see how terrorists attacking Denmark gets one reaction (ignored) while the exact same terrorists attacking the US brings volumes of condemnation for America. So, I figured, heh, why not apply their arguments here and see how well it sticks?
Looks pretty silly, doesn't it? Yet there isn't a progressive within miles of this thread, with the exception of daydream condemning the US and the $10 billion dollars in aid we gave Pakistan. Imagine that. :)
0
Madverts
Superlib,
"You can see how terrorists attacking Denmark gets one reaction (ignored) while the exact same terrorists attacking the US brings volumes of condemnation for America. "
Maybe you could explain to me which Danish foreign policies are to blame for the rise of Islamic fundementalism?
Back to top