Putin assails U.S. over Georgia conflict
MOSCOW —
Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin accused Washington on Thursday of manufacturing the Georgia conflict as tensions mounted with the United States threatening to scrap a nuclear deal in protest at Moscow’s actions.
Russia tested an inter-continental missile before Putin, the powerful former Kremlin leader who now heads the government, said the U.S. administration had a hand in the five-day war between Russian and Georgian forces.
“The fact is that U.S. citizens were indeed in the area in conflict during the hostilities. It should be admitted that they would do so only following direct orders from their leaders,” Putin said in an interview with CNN.
He said he suspected that “someone in the U.S. specially created this conflict” to “create an advantage” for a U.S. presidential candidate.
His remarks drew a swift response from the White House which described them as “patently false.”
Washington said it was considering scrapping a U.S.-Russia civilian nuclear cooperation pact in response to Moscow’s actions in Georgia and its recognition of South Ossetia and Abkhazia as separate states. France said the European Union could impose sanctions on Russia.
The missile test in northern Russia came barely a week after the United States completed an accord with Poland on basing an anti-missile shield in central Europe and as Russia accuses NATO of building up its navy vessels in the Black Sea.
A spokesman for Russia’s strategic nuclear forces said the 6,000-kilometer test of the Topol RS-12M was successful. Russia has been developing the missile in response to US plans to develop its shield.
The announcement came as Russia complained about the number of NATO ships in the Black Sea and said it was taking “measures of precaution.”
Russian television broadcast excerpts of the Putin interview to CNN.
“If my guess is right, then it raises the suspicion that someone in the U.S. specially created this conflict to worsen the situation and create an advantage in the competitive struggle for one of the candidates for the post of president of the United States,” he said.
The tight race to the Nov 4 vote in the United States pits Democrat Barack Obama against Republican John McCain, who has been hawkish in his public response to the Georgia conflict.
A White House spokeswoman said “those claims first and foremost are patently false, but it also sounds like his defense officials who said they believed this to be true are giving him really bad advice.”
Asked whether Washington planned to go through with a recent accord allowing U.S. and Russian companies to form joint ventures in the nuclear sector, the spokeswoman said: “I don’t think there’s anything to announce yet, but I know that that is under discussion.”
The stand-off with the West has deepened since President Dmitry Medvedev’s announcement that Russia recognized South Ossetia and another rebel region, Abkhazia, as independent states.
Georgia’s parliament called for the government to cut diplomatic ties with Moscow over Russia’s “occupation of Georgian territory” in a resolution adopted unanimously in Tbilisi.
Later Thursday, Georgia called for an international investigation into the events that led to its conflict with Russia and allegations of widespread human rights abuses.
“It is time to establish the truth about the crimes committed before and during Russia’s invasion of Georgia,” the foreign ministry in Tbilisi said in a statement.
EU states are considering imposing sanctions on Russia at an emergency summit on the Georgian crisis on Monday, French Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner said.
“Sanctions are being considered, and many other means,” said Kouchner, whose country holds the European Union presidency.
Russia claimed it had secured support from China and four other nations at a summit in Dushanbe, the Tajikistan capital.
A statement released by the six nations at the Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit voiced support for Russia’s “active role” in “assisting in peace and cooperation in the region”.
However, the declaration also called for respect for “territorial integrity” without specifically naming Georgia.
A senior Russian general accused Georgia of redeploying forces near South Ossetia and said foreign powers were helping to rebuild the country’s military capability.
“Georgia continues the redeployment of its forces in the direction of South Ossetia and the restoration of the combat capability of its troops,” the deputy head of Russia’s general staff, Anatoly Nogovitsyn, said in a briefing.
The U.N. Security Council was to hold a formal meeting to discuss the conflict in Georgia on Thursday afternoon, though diplomats said there would be no decision made.
Moscow argues that it recognized Abkhazia and South Ossetia to protect the local inhabitants after Russian forces poured into Georgia earlier this month to repel a Georgian attack on the latter region.
Wire reports








Order by Time Order by Popularity
33 Comments
Login to comment
0
reddragonguy
Russia claimed it had secured support from China and four other nations at a summit in Dushanbe
United....we stand!
0
ColAmerica
And as we all knew Putin has total authority over Russia. They guy has dangerous asperations. Blaming the US is a red herring that will fool noone but the most gullible of liberal folks.
Putin is putting the world in danger, maybe special forces should take him out.
0
Everton2
ColAmerica : You sound like Senator McCain
0
SuperLib
It is a bit shocking to hear Putin talk like he's writing a post on Japan Today...
0
Betzee
Well if he does he will find folks ready to fight his country's aggression right here. Incidentally, when did the fighting keyboarders become a branch of the service?
0
soldave
ColAmerica - Maybe the US should go and liberate Russia. They do have WMD's afterall ;)
0
ColAmerica
soldave- I think the liberation of Russia would be to depose the facist government that surpresses its people.
McCain will make the right choice when he is elected. I think Russia will have backed down by November. Even Putin the thug knows better than to mess witha guy like McCain.
0
ColAmerica
adaydream;
It is ine thing to thinbk something, and another to prove it.
Please show me any proof youhave, that this administration had any part of "alledged" Georgian aggression.
I await your reply with baited breath.
0
adaydream
ColAmerica - I posed a question and I answered my own question.
Do I think that the same administration could be a part of the Georgia agression.
Yes.
This was an opinion. I did not say I had facts. I just said that I believe; that I think that this administration could do it.
So ColAmerica, have a good evening. < :-)
0
sabiwabi
Immediately before the Georgian military attacked S. Ossetia, they were being trained by Americans and Israelis for exactly that kind of attack.
At first, it sounds like quite a wild accusation, but in fact it did boost McCain's rating. And we all know that McCain wants to bomb Iran.
Don't believe anything until it has been officially denied!
0
Alinsky4prez
Like you mr sabiwabi I have to say I'd believe The Kremlin first.
After all, they are closer to Georgia than we are.
0
yosun
I really don't understand why you western (including american & russian) can't tolerate just one day of a peaceful world? just not long ago i began to suppose that cold war times had already gone~
0
sdmsec
Funny. Everywhere I look there's war and ethnic conflict. I haven't gotten the impression it's particular to the west.
0
bebert
Russia has a national interest to protect in Georgia and was defending ethnic Russians from an assault started by Georgia. The same can't be said for the USA when it used force to break Kosovo away from Serbia and sponsored political revolutions in the Ukraine and Georgia.
0
presto345
They don't give a f... about the ethnic Russians. They never in history have, actually, except for political and strategic purposes. For Plunder Putin the best defense of HIS actions is the attack. Again politically and militarily. The aim is clear. Access to the Black Sea and energy life lines.
0
SezWho2
bebert,
Very succinctly said. NATO was anti-Soviet from the get-go and part of the Soviet aggression of the 50s and 60s was to create a secure border. With the fall of the Soviet Union it was rather insane to think that we could try to wean the border republics to the NATO camp and pretend that this was no threat to the Russians.
0
Alinsky4prez
Which "aggression" was that?
0
skipthesong
They don't give a f... about the ethnic Russians." Actually, now its the shoe on the other foot. Heard that Russians were pretty stuck up, just like they were in Cuba according to relatives. Basically had carte blanch and immunity to do what they wanted at will..
Not saying the revenge was worth it, just pointing out.
0
VOR
People will believe anything and Putin knows it. Putin orders Russian troops to destroy Georgian infrastructure and he blames it on one of the American political parties. Why am I not surprised.
Oh those evil Republicans. No need to fear a new day will dawn. Barack America to the rescue.
0
tclh
With this"blame everything on America" attitude, if a Russian cow dies the next day by unknown cause, Mr Putin will no doubt blame GWB as well! how convenient.
0
SezWho2
Alinsky4prez,
I think that the borders of the Soviet Union were fairly well defined by the end of WW2. The aggressions that I am thinking of were the put-down of uprisings in Hungary and Poland in the 50s and its attempts to control the governments of its buffer states on up to Czechoslovakia in the late 60s.
To hear Americans talk at that time, it was as though the Soviets were "threatening our way of life". The Russkies were coming! That was never the case. More close to the truth is that Russia proper did not want to be invaded again. After losing close to 30 million people in the war, that's kind of understandable.
0
Alinsky4prez
The continuity they show to this day is inspiring, isn't it.
0
jeancolmar
I rather doubt that the Georgian aggression against South Ossetia was hatched in Washington. It was way too stupid. But Mikheil Saakashvili, the demento Georgian president, no doubt believed that the West would support him in his murderous assault on a peaceful civilian target. He was right, but he did not count on Russia coming to the rescue.
That the US is using this incident to get at Russia is an act of aggression, as is the placing of missile bases close to Russia's borders. Imagine how the US would react if Russia placed missiles in Canada, Mexico or Cuba. (Remember the so-called Cuba missile crisis?)
Russia has not bothered anyone since the end of the Cold War and one has to wonder why there has been all this intimidation before Mikheil Saakashvili's genocidal attack on South Ossetia. My only guess is that the U.S. war industry wants to increase profits and promotions.
Meanwhile Mikheil Saakashvili has much to answer for. My guess is that the US while openly supporting him is not altogether pleased with him. He has proven himself to be a loose canon, which makes him a potential liability. Saddam comes to mind--a former US friend who really blew it.
Anyway, the so-called Georgian conflict was started by Mikheil Saakashvili and no one else. He has a lot of innocent blood on his hands. But to borrow a phrase from Hitler, who cares about the South Ossetians?
0
SezWho2
Alinsky4prez,
We'll talk again when you can muster something more than one sentence of sarcasm.
It doesn't seem to me that Russia has shown any greater continuity than its arch-enemy has, perhaps less in that it was willing to try to get along with the US. But it seems to me that both Clinton and Bush wanted to rub Russia's face in the offal of Soviet collapse. Post WW1 Germany mightily resented similar treatment.
0
Alinsky4prez
That is as good an explanation as any for their support of the Workers Paradise that brave Robt Mugabe is trying to build.
0
usaexpat
I will say it again Russia has absolutely no credibility on anything given the history of the Soviet Union. During and after WWII they "liberated" a lot of countries to build their empire. I'm sure Stalin and Putin could have a drink together and share their thoughts on Russian expansionism.
0
Hun
If EU and US don't respond appropriately to this agression, Russia will take it as an implicit sign that West is giving carte blanche to terrorize her former satellite states, as long as she keeps pumping oil and gas into pipelines bound to Europe. This kind of appeasement is pathetic and worst form of "oil for blood".
0
LIBERTAS
Here's what happened behind this whole Georgia thing, and Putin is the only one telling it straight: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=9828 Veep Cheney's comment to Georgia,"I promise to send you plenty of other peoples' money and other peoples' children with which to create a real mess I can make a ton of cash off of!"
0
SezWho2
That is as good an example as any of irrelevance to the issue of the Russia and Georgia.
0
reddragonguy
Bush is a lame duck president now...
Back to top