Republicans turn to foreign policy in debate
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
( 3 )
( 6 )
( 1 )
( 0 )
( 0 )
Order by Time Order by Popularity
15 Comments
Login to comment
0
Faceless1
American foreign policy: Send troops and weapons to our allies, rain bombs on our enemies or otherwise threaten to, no one is neutral, you are either with us or against us, grunt, grunt.
Enemies= those who have oil but won't let us send our companies in to tap it.
Allies=the enemy of our enemy
This applies slightly more to Republicans than Democrats, slightly.
Class dismissed.
1
anglootaku
Foreign Policy: Secure foreign black gold oil, contain China, bash dictator regimes
1
anglootaku
Increase further debts check, brainwash the masses into thinking war is inevitable check
1
anglootaku
Republicans due to win as no coverage of other parties showing just a one sided view of who the public should and will eventually vote for check
1
SushiSake3
"Republicans turn to foreign policy in debate"
lol" Obama blows all of them out of the water in foreign policy.
Amazing, foreign policy used to be a strong GOP talking point, but since Obama took over and took out bad guy after bad guy, the GOP has completely surrendered foreign policy.
This debate will no doubt show what a bunch of total no hopers the GOP has become.
BTW, I’m curious as to what former pizza chain CEO Herman Cain’s view on fighting terrorists is…
-1
SushiSake3
Being a conservative means standing aside as the GOP works hard to strengthen America’s enemies by taking out those enemies’ worst enemies (Iran, Iraq) on the U.S. taxpayers’ dime, weakening America by engaging in massively expensive conflicts without paying for them, and then being too ill-informed to understand why doing the above is so damaging..
Surrender, it’s the conservative way.
0
SushiSake3
Q: Do any of these GOP candidates actually have passports? Have any travelled outside America?
I'm asking, because when I read about their foreign policy ideas and proposals, I get a very clear idea that they have been getting their view of the outside world from Hollywood movies.
0
SuperLib
No need to be flippant.
1
unreconstructed
Do the search. Romney lived in France for a couple years, is fluent in the language. Obama, supposedly graduated from Columbia University but admitted on the campaign trail that he cannot speak a foreign language. Gingrich is widely traveled. Maybe you should look into why he went to Poland and what he saw.
-1
Bebert61
Foreign policy:
Romney, Gingrich: Attack Iran.
Cain, Paul: Don't attack Iran.
The majority opinion of war weary and financially exhausted Americans: Don't attack Iran.
If Paul can't win the nomination, the responsible choice out of the three front runners is Cain.
-1
Laguna
Predicts Romney:
My goodness, Mitt, that is some precognition! Let's be more specific: Elect Mitt, start another war! - and one that will make Iraq look like the cakewalk that was promised!
0
Laguna
Perry later of waterboarding:
This means, I assume, that he also sanctions it as an interrogation method against US troops.
0
Laguna
Cain expounds on the Arab Spring:
"Out of hand" this freedom is! That we would allow these Arabs to roam off the American plantation is intolerable! And:
Yes! Ignore the Arab street and stand behind our "friends"! Aside from al Qaeda, what should these Arab people be concerned about, after all?
-1
SushiSake3
Jokes aside - have the GOP/TP found themselves a serious candidate yet?
Besides Jon Huntsman, all the rest are circus acts.
-1
SushiSake3
These GOP debates - I'm sure they're being sponsored by President Obama and the DNC.....
Back to top