« Back To World Top

Results dispute signals more delays in Zimbabwe

Friday 02nd May, 02:35 AM JST

The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.

2 Comments

  • Scrote at 09:32 AM JST - 2nd May

    Both sides agree that Mugabe didn't win, so why is he still president?

  • unscrejects at 09:15 AM JST - 7th May

    Scrote (nice name) : to answer your question, you'd have to go to the real story of Zimbabwe. Mugabe has the upper hand in that he's the original 'victim'. And as I've been saying for almost ten years now, his adversaries challenged him for an issue that was not related to Zimbabwean land but ended up having the land used as a weapon against him. And the election 'winner' inadvertently got himself mixed up with that lot - in fact they launched his political career for the sole purpose of hitting Bob. He's aware of that now and also of the fact that he stands a super chance of being exposed. This is also the problem for the international community. They know the back ground and have very little to say if Mugabe tells them to take a hike - since they sat back while he was attacked ('97). No one has the moral right to call anything on Zimbabwe at the moment.

Register or login to add a comment!