Suspected U.S. missile strikes kill 20 in Pakistan
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
The requested article has expired, and is no longer available. Any related articles, and user comments are shown below.
( 2 )
( 1 )
( 6 )
( 10 )
( 7 )
Order by Time Order by Popularity
14 Comments
Login to comment
0
bushlover
It must be to control the oil!! Yeah that's it!! I can see the oil grab going on right there as soon as they mentioned Amerika. And of course if they suspect that it was those Amerikans then I am convinced that it was but if Amerikans suspect anything about anything then they are outright liars!! This is my left wing dope hazed hypocritical thinking coming into play here so I can tow the line of all the "Blame Amerika" crowd and look like a genius in their eyes. I am loved here.
0
smithinjapan
Well, just hope they don't wonder why there might be an increase in hostility and/or attacks on US troops.
0
bushlover
because they are stealing the oil? Is that right Mr.Smith?
0
rjd_jr
Unbelievable. "Alleged" militants? Wouldn't be surprised to see reports tomorrow that, whoops, it was actually 12 civilians. So sorry.
Who is in charge of this mess? Do they not read the headlines, do they not understand that lobbing missile after missile after missile is counter productive? Are they really that ignorant to engage in military actions that only create more insurgents?
0
skipthesong
In a way, I don't get it. Pakistan accepted a lot of money to fight these people. Now, the givers of this money are not allowed to pursue those who they had paid to be fought...
0
bushlover
[Who is in charge of this mess? Do they not read the headlines, do they not understand that lobbing missile after missile after missile is counter productive? Are they really that ignorant to engage in military actions that only create more insurgents?] yeah don't insurgents know that this will only create more missiles coming their way? Don't these idiots know that bombing civilians and taking out civilian targets will only get them the same? How stupid!!
0
some14some
No, because they have been burning Oil in Indian Ocean for seven years without any success against AQ/Taliban.
0
CavemanLawyer
I think we should allow the Pakistanis to run amok on U.S. soil because we might have al-Quaida operatives in the U.S. still.
Funny how one shoe fits but its mate does not at all!
Do you think it might be possible that the Pakistanis are annoyed with us for not putting Afghanistan together before going on that stupid adventure in Iraq? You think our wasting of resources in Iraq while the Taliban is resurgent in Afghanistan might chafe a bit? --Cirroc
0
CavemanLawyer
It sounds as if you completely forgot about that oil pipeline across Afghanistan. Have not heard about it recently, have you?
http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/trade/2002-09-16-afghanistan-tarif-free_x.htm
0
coulrophobic
A cynic might say it looks more and more like Al Qaeda and The Taliban just want to take up the founders of what we call Pakistan on their word that as a country it would represent a refuge for 'Asian' Muslims unable to live alongside Hindus and eventually the land from which the faithful would see the development of a modern nation committed to a purer form of Islam than is found in the Middle East.
Whose fault is it if the same centuries-old violence and infighting has inevitably arisen among all the Muslims concerned?
0
WilliB
You can be sure that whatever the infidel American missiles hit, will be a building exclusively populated by cute little babies and totally innocent civilians. The Taleban have learnt how to play the gullible Western media from their Hamas and Mizbollah friends.
0
SuperLib
....not a very intelligent comment.
0
bushlover
[You can be sure that whatever the infidel American missiles hit, will be a building exclusively populated by cute little babies and totally innocent civilians.] Don't forget it will kill 5,000,000 of them too. We can't leave out any detail. The leftist "sky is falling" crowd tell us it is so with NO PROOF!! It's funny how one shoe fits but it's mate "NO PROOF" doesn't. I believe that would be an example of what's that word... hypocrisy.
0
CavemanLawyer
You are right. It was a sarcastic comment. --Cirroc
Back to top